Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mapping the knowledge development and trend of household energy consumption

  • Review
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Household energy consumption has been one of the most critical factors to climate change. We conducted bibliometric research on household energy consumption by using CiteSpace and HistCite. The Web of Science was used to identify and visualize the evolution of paper citation diagram, the collaboration network, the cocitation network and emerging trends by mapping the knowledge domain of 2984 academic publications between 2011 and 2018 related to household energy consumption. The results showed that the number of academic articles published in the field of household energy consumption and carbon emissions was on the rise, but the number of highly cited articles decreased. The most productive authors and institutions in this subject are in Australia, the USA, China, Britain and Germany. Much of the research has focused on electricity consumption and heat supply, while there have been few studies on other subdomains in the area of energy consumption. The impact of greenhouse gases produced by energy consumption on the environment was the focus of this study. Here, we present an in-depth analysis of household energy consumption and carbon emission research to better understand global trends and hot topics in this field which have emerged over the last few years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin, L. (1990). Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(411), 160.

  • Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9–10), 1082–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, B. W. (2005). The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: A practical guide. Energy Policy, 33(7), 867–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S. , Gilg, A. W. , & Ford, N. . (2005). The household examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1425–1444.

  • Brand, C., Goodman, A., Rutter, H., Song, Y., & Ogilvie, D. (2013). Associations of individual, household and environmental characteristics with carbon dioxide emissions from motorised passenger travel. Applied Energy, 104, 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2012). Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics. European Economic Review, 56(5), 931–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., Druckman, A., Firth, S. K., & Jackson, T. (2013). Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy, 55, 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. Q., Guo, S., Shao, L., Li, J. S., & Chen, Z. M. (2013). Three-scale input–output modeling for urban economy: Carbon emission by Beijing 2007. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 18(9), 2493–2506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Z., Wang, H., Xiong, W., Zhu, D., & Cheng, L. (2021). Public–private partnership as a driver of sustainable development: Toward a conceptual framework of sustainability-oriented PPP. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 1043–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J., & Caldeira, K. (2010). Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12), 5687–5692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2008). Household energy consumption in the UK: A highly geographically and socio-economically disaggregated model. Energy Policy, 36(8), 3177–3192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2009). The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2066–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, A., Chitnis, M., Sorrell, S., & Jackson, T. (2011). Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3572–3581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., Yin, J., & Wu, B. (2018). Climate change and tourism: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(1), 108–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., & Sharif, A. (2010). The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—A survey of the experimental evidence. Energy, 35(4), 1598–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Z., Zou, L., & Wei,Y. (2011). The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China. Energy, 36(1), 656–670.

  • Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gram-Hanssen, K. (2013). Efficient technologies or user behaviour, which is the more important when reducing households’ energy consumption? Energy Efficiency, 6(3), 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Z. H., Sun, Q., & Wennersten, R. (2013). Impact of urban residences on energy consumption and carbon emissions: An investigation in Nanjing, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 7, 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2010). Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6111–6119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, X., & Wei, C. (2021). Household energy consumption: State of the art, research gaps and future prospects. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01179-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Z., Wang, M., Cheng Z., & Yang Z. (2020). Impact of marginal and intergenerational effects on carbon emissions from household energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273(10), 123022.

  • Huang, L., Kelly, S., Lv, K., & Giurco, D. (2019). A systematic review of empirical methods for modelling sectoral carbon emissions in China. Journal of cleaner production, 219, 1382–1401.

  • Jakob, M., & Marschinski, R. (2013). Interpreting trade-related CO 2 emission transfers. Nature Climate Change, 3(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Kammen, D. M. (2014). Spatial distribution of US household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2), 895–902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lauretis, S. D., Ghersi, F., & Cayla, J. M. (2017). Energy consumption and activity patterns: an analysis extended to total time and energy use for french households. Applied Energy, 206(11), 634–648.

  • Kavousian, A., Rajagopal, R., & Fischer, M. (2013). Determinants of residential electricity consumption: Using smart meter data to examine the effect of climate, building characteristics, appliance stock, and occupants’ behavior. Energy, 55(6), 184–194.

  • Lee, S., & Lee, B. (2014). The influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the US household sector. Energy Policy, 68, 534–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Sweeney, J. (2012). Modelling the impact of urban form on household energy demand and related CO2 emissions in the Greater Dublin Region. Energy Policy, 46, 359–369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Gao, C., & Lu, Y. (2017). The impact of urbanization on GHG emissions in China: The role of population density. Journal of Cleaner Production, 157, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malla, S. (2013). Household energy consumption patterns and its environmental implications: Assessment of energy access and poverty in Nepal. Energy Policy, 61, 990–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, F., Duffy, A., & Conlon, M. (2012). Characterising domestic electricity consumption patterns by dwelling and occupant socio-economic variables: An Irish case study. Energy and Buildings, 48, 240–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsenian-Rad, A. H., & Leon-Garcia, A. (2010). Optimal residential load control with price prediction in real-time electricity pricing environments. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 1(2), 120–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsenian-Rad, A. H., Wong, V. W., Jatskevich, J., Schober, R., & Leon-Garcia, A. (2010). Autonomous demand-side management based on game-theoretic energy consumption scheduling for the future smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 1(3), 320–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özcan, K. M., Gülay, E., & Üçdoğruk, Ş. (2013). Economic and demographic determinants of household energy use in Turkey. Energy Policy, 60, 550–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Fuss, S., Jackson, R. B., Korsbakken, J. I., & Nakicenovic, N. (2017). Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change, 7(2), 118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pu, B., & Qiu, Y. (2015). A Bibliometric analysis on urbanization research from 1984 to 2013. Open House International, 40(3), 37–43.

  • Qu, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Cang, Y. (2020). Sustainability assessment of urban residential consumption in china megacity. Environment Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00929-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, I., Thomson, M., Infield, D., & Clifford, C. (2010). Domestic electricity use: A high-resolution energy demand model. Energy and Buildings, 42(10), 1878–1887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2012). Human drivers of national greenhouse-gas emissions. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan, G., & Dominic, J. (2014). A Ten-year bibliometric analysis of research trends in three leading ecology journals during 2003–2012. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 2(3), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salari, Mahmoud, Javid, & Roxana, J. (2017). Modeling household energy expenditure in the united states. Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 69(3), 822–832.

  • Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., & Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1356–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, L. G., & Ugursal, V. I. (2009). Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: A review of modeling techniques. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(8), 1819–1835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, X., Chang, M., Lin, C., & Tanikawa, H. (2014). China’s carbon footprint: A regional perspective on the effect of transitions in consumption and production patterns. Applied Energy, 123, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner, P. E. (2004). Agricultural technology and its societal implications. Technology in Society, 26(2–3), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, H., Wang, K., Zhao, X., Chen, F., Li, X., & Pan, L. (2011). Relationship between construction characteristics and carbon emissions from urban household operational energy usage. Energy and Buildings, 43(1), 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). How to reduce household carbon emissions: A review of experience and policy design considerations. Energy Policy, 102, 116–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Luo, L., & Skitmore, M. (2015). Household carbon emission research: An analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 873–883.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Peng, X. (2012). The impacts of population change on carbon emissions in China during 1978–2008. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 36, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is sponsored by the grants of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71734001), the Humanity and Social Science Youth foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 18YJC630019; 18XJC630007), the Key projects of scientific research plan of Department of Education of Shaanxi Province (No.20JT038), the Shaanxi Science and Technology Plan Project (No.2019ZDLSF06-07)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhe Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Z., Wang, M. & Cheng, Z. Mapping the knowledge development and trend of household energy consumption. Environ Dev Sustain 24, 6053–6071 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01727-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01727-z

Keywords

Navigation