Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Household energy consumption: state of the art, research gaps, and future prospects

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Household energy consumption accounts for almost one third of global primary energy demand and significantly affects the environment. As such, it has served as a classic and compelling theme in the literature, with a range of studies having analyzed various aspects of household consumption, including energy conservation, energy poverty, and energy efficiency. Nonetheless, overall trends and frontiers in this research area have not been characterized and are poorly understood. This study aims to assess the current status, evolution, and emerging topics in this area through a bibliometric and network analysis of 1134 extracted publications from 1983 to 2018. This systematic review shows that nearly half the studies on household energy consumption were published in just three journals (namely, Energy Policy; Energy; and Energy Economics) with a focus on three areas (Environmental Sciences and Ecology; Energy and Fuels; Business and Economics). The findings also show that among contributing countries, the USA and China have the closest ties and wield the most academic influence. Furthermore, emerging and pioneering studies on behavioral interventions, energy conservation, and energy poverty and those pertaining to climate and electricity consumption may constitute the research frontier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2009). How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households’ direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 711–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adusah-Poku, F., & Takeuchi, K. (2019). Energy poverty in Ghana: Any progress so far? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, A. S., Hassan, M. Y., Abdullah, M. P., Rahman, H. A., Hussin, F., Abdullah, H., & Saidur, R. (2014). A review on applications of ANN and SVM for building electrical energy consumption forecasting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allcott, H., & Greenstone, M. (2012). Is there an energy efficiency gap? Journal of Economic Perspective, 26(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, J. M., Castiello, C., & Mencar, C. (2018). A Bibliometric analysis of the explainable artificial intelligence research field. In J. Medina, M. Ojeda-Aciego, J. L. Verdegay, D. A. Pelta, I. P. Cabrera, B. Bouchon-Meunier, & R. R. Yager (Eds.), Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Theory and Foundations (pp. 3–15). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amasyali, K., & El-Gohary, N. M. (2018). A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1192–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andor, M. A., & Fels, K. M. (2018). Behavioral economics and energy conservation a systematic review of non-price interventions and their causal effects. Ecological Economics, 148, 178–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attari, S. Z., DeKay, M. L., Davidson, C. I., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010). Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(37), 16054–16059.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Axsen, J., TyreeHageman, J., & Lentz, A. (2012). Lifestyle practices and pro-environmental technology. Ecological Economics, 82, 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., & Fierer, N. (2011). Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. The ISME Journal, 6, 343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens, A. (1986). Total energy consumption by Brazilian households. Energy, 11(6), 607–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, F., & Fuglseth, M. (2018). Life cycle assessment and historic buildings: energy-efficiency refurbishment versus new construction in Norway. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 24(2), 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betto, F., Garengo, P., & Lorenzoni, A. (2020). A new measure of Italian hidden energy poverty. Energy Policy, 138, 111237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj, K., & Gupta, E. (2017). Analyzing the “energy-efficiency gap”: An empirical analysis of air conditioners in the household sector of Delhi. Indian Growth and Development Review, 10(2), 66–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binita, K. C., & Ruth, M. (2017). Estimation and projection of institutional building electricity consumption. Energy and Buildings, 143, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 12–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2012). Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics. Eur. Econ. Rev., 56(5), 931–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownstone, D., & Golob, T. F. (2009). The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrion, D., Lee, W. V., & Hernandez, D. (2018). Residual inequity: Assessing the unintended consequences of New York City’s clean heat transition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(1), 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaño-Rosa, R., Solís-Guzmán, J., Rubio-Bellido, C., & Marrero, M. (2019). Towards a multiple-indicator approach to energy poverty in the European Union: A review. Energy and Buildings, 193, 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandel, S. S., Sharma, A., & Marwaha, B. M. (2016). Review of energy efficiency initiatives and regulations for residential buildings in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1443–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copiello, S. (2017). Building energy efficiency: A research branch made of paradoxes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 1064–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, C. A., & McDonald, L. (1998). Forecasting energy demand in the developing world. Energy Sources, 20(9), 875–889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, S. (2006). The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays, 486, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1998). Rural household energy consumption: the effects of access to electricity—evidence from South Africa. Energy Policy, 26(3), 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106(44), 18452–18456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., & Cronin, B. (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2008). Household energy consumption in the UK: A highly geographically and socio-economically disaggregated model. Energy Policy, 36(8), 3177–3192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2009). The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input-output model. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2066–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: A tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 79–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossati, M., Scalco, V. A., Linczuk, V. C. C., & Lamberts, R. (2016). Building energy efficiency: An overview of the Brazilian residential labeling scheme. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 1216–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire-González, J. (2011). Methods to empirically estimate direct and indirect rebound effect of energy-saving technological changes in households. Ecological Modeling, 223(1), 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs-Flournoy, E. A., Gilmour, M. I., Higuchi, M., Jetter, J., George, I., Copeland, L., et al. (2018). Differential exposure and acute health impacts of inhaled solid-fuel emissions from rudimentary and advanced cookstoves in female CD-1 mice. Environmental Research, 161, 35–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, J. F. (2010). Empirical evidence of direct rebound effect in Catalonia. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2309–2314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granade, H. C., Creyts, J., Derkach, A., Farese, P., Nyquist, S., & Ostrowski, K. (2009). Unlocking energy efficiency in the US economy. New York: McKinsey and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, A., Preval, N., Young, C., Arnold, R., Denne, T., Howden-Chapman, P., & Telfar-Barnard, L. (2016). Does retrofitted insulation reduce household energy use? Theory and Practice. Energy Journal, 37(4), 165–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E., & Brown, M. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3(4), 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, E., & Norland, I. T. (2005). Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: Household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo region. Urban Stud., 42(12), 2145–2166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, M., & Van Vuuren, D. P. (2009). Modeling global residential sector energy demand for heating and air conditioning in the context of climate change. Energy policy, 37(2), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachimowicz, J. M., Hauser, O. P., O’Brien, J. D., Sherman, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2018). The critical role of second-order normative beliefs in predicting energy conservation. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(10), 757–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1994). The energy-efficiency gap: What does it mean? Energy Policy, 22(10), 804–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. L., Goggins, G., Fahy, F., Grealis, E., Vadovics, E., Genus, A., & Rau, H. (2018). Towards a practice-theoretical classification of sustainable energy consumption initiatives: Insights from social scientific energy research in 30 European countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 45, 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., Ma, X., Chen, X., Cheng, Y., Baris, E., & Ezzati, M. (2006). Exposure to indoor air pollution from household energy use in rural China: The interactions of technology, behavior, and knowledge in health risk management. Social Science and Medicine, 62(12), 3161–3176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürisoo, M., Serenje, N., Mwila, F., Lambe, F., & Osborne, M. (2019). Old habits die hard: Using the energy cultures framework to understand drivers of household-level energy transitions in urban Zambia. Energy Research and Social Science, 53, 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurj, A. L., Wen, W. Q., Gao, Y. T., Matthews, C. E., Yang, G., Li, H. L., et al. (2007). Patterns and correlates of physical activity: A cross-sectional study in urban Chinese women. Bmc Public Health, 7, 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, B., Davis, N., Sanguinetti, A., Gamble, K., Kirkby, D., & Stokols, D. (2014). Dimensions of conservation exploring differences among energy behaviors. Environ. Behav., 46(4), 423–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaygusuz, K. (2011). Energy services and energy poverty for sustainable rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(2), 936–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurmi, O. P., Semple, S., Simkhada, P., Smith, W. C. S., & Ayres, J. G. (2010). COPD and chronic bronchitis risk of indoor air pollution from solid fuel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax, 65(3), 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, G. (1992). The energy transition. Energy Policy, 20(2), 116–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., & Yan, E. (2018). Co-mention network of R packages: Scientific impact and clustering structure. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Luck, G. W. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421(6922), 530–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Hou, B. D., Ma, X. W., & Liao, H. (2018). Solid fuel use for cooking and its health effects on the elderly in rural China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(4), 3669–3680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynham, J., Nitta, K., Saijo, T., & Tarui, N. (2016). Why does real-time information reduce energy consumption? Energy Economics, 54, 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, P., Cao, X., Buonocore, J., Cedeno-Laurent, J., Spengler, J., Bernstein, A., & Allen, J. (2018). Energy savings, emission reductions, and health co-benefits of the green building movement. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology, 28(4), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, J., Bardhan, R., & Banerji, P. (2020). Rethinking indoor thermal comfort in the era of rebound and pre-bound effect for the developing world: A systematic review. Indoor Air, 30(3), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui, K., Ochiai, H., & Yamagata, Y. (2014). Feedback on electricity usage for home energy management: A social experiment in a local village of cold region. Applied Energy, 120, 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J.-B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlemiss, L., Ambrosio-Albalá, P., Emmel, N., Gillard, R., Gilbertson, J., Hargreaves, T., et al. (2019). Energy poverty and social relations: A capabilities approach. Energy Research and Social Science, 55, 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, K., Zhang, Z., Wright, J., & Ma, Y. (2010). Decomposing background topics from keywords by principal component pursuit. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, Toronto, ON, Canada, pp. 269–278.

  • Modeste, K. N., Mempouo, B., René, T., Costa, Á. M., Orosa, J. A., Raminosoa, C. R. R., & Mamiharijaona, R. (2015). Resource potential and energy efficiency in the buildings of Cameroon: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mould, R., & Baker, K. J. (2017). Documenting fuel poverty from the householders’ perspective. Energy Research and Social Science, 31, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Muñoz, A. M., & Mirón-Valdivieso, M. D. (2017). Analysis of collaboration and co-citation networks between researchers studying violence involving women. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 22(2), n2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nafade, V., Nash, M., Huddart, S., Pande, T., Gebreselassie, N., Lienhardt, C., & Pai, M. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007–2016. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0199706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2011). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 257–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouedraogo, B. (2006). Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Energy Policy, 34(18), 3787–3795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, J., Long, E., & Hokao, K. (2010). Rebound effect in Chinese household energy efficiency and solution for mitigating it. Energy, 35(12), 5269–5276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri, S., & Jiang, L. (2008). The household energy transition in India and China. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4022–4035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri, S., Mueller, A., Kemmler, A., & Spreng, D. (2004). On measuring energy poverty in Indian households. World Development, 32(12), 2083–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri, S., & Spreng, D. (2011). Measuring and monitoring energy poverty. Energy Policy, 39(12), 7497–7504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. (1999). The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Stanford: Stanford InfoLab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. G. (1996). What is energy efficiency?: Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy, 24(5), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschruft for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, 5, 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003a). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Wiersma, G. (2003). Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, A., Gago, A., Labandeira, X., & Linares, P. (2015). The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector. Energy Economics, 52, S17–S29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2008). Energy, equity and the future of the fuel poor. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4471–4474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Guevara Sánchez, C., Sanz Fernández, A., Núñez Peiró, M., & Gómez Muñoz, G. (2020). Energy poverty in Madrid: Data exploitation at the city and district level. Energy Policy, 144, 111653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanusi, Y. A., & Owoyele, G. S. (2016). Energy poverty and its spatial differences in nigeria: Reversing the trend. Energy Procedia, 93, 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell, S., & Dimitropoulos, J. (2008). The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 636–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., & Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1356–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadelmann, M., & Schubert, R. (2018). How do different designs of energy labels influence purchases of household appliances? A field study in Switzerland. Ecological Economics, 144, 112–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L. (2008). Promoting household energy conservation. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4449–4453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach, G., Zanocco, C., Flora, J., Rajagopal, R., & Boudet, H. S. (2020). Exploring household energy rules and activities during peak demand to better determine potential responsiveness to time-of-use pricing. Energy Policy, 144, 111608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, J., Barton, B., Carrington, G., Doering, A., Ford, R., Hopkins, D., et al. (2015). The energy cultures framework: Exploring the role of norms, practices and material culture in shaping energy behaviour in New Zealand. Energy Research and Social Science, 7, 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhakara, B. (2004). Economic and social dimensions of household energy use: A case study of India. In E. Ortega & S. Ulgiati (Eds.), Proceedings of IV Biennial International Workshop “Advances in Energy Studies” (pp. 469–477). Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil. June 16–19, 2004.

  • Tani, M., Papaluca, O., & Sasso, P. (2018). The system thinking perspective in the open-innovation research: A systematic review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, H., Simcock, N., Bouzarovski, S., & Petrova, S. (2019). Energy poverty and indoor cooling: An overlooked issue in Europe. Energy and Buildings, 196, 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tigala, S., Sharma, A. R., & Sachdeva, K. (2018). Health risk assessment due to biomass smoke exposure in Indian indoor environment: An empirical approach using lung deposition model. Science of the Total Environment, 640, 935–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Han, B., & Lu, M. (2016). Measurement of energy rebound effect in households: Evidence from residential electricity consumption in Beijing, China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 852–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. L., & Matthews, H. S. (2008). Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecological Economics, 66(2–3), 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H., Simoes, A. F., La Rovere, E. L., Alam, M., Rahman, A., & Mwakasonda, S. (2011). Access and affordability of electricity in developing countries. World Development, 39(6), 1037–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, C., Shelef, O., & Gertler, P. J. (2012). How will energy demand develop in the developing world? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 17747.

  • Wolske, K. S., Gillingham, K. T., & Schultz, P. W. (2020). Peer influence on household energy behaviours. Nature Energy, 5(3), 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Zheng, X., & Wei, C. (2017). Measurement of inequality using household energy consumption data in rural China. Nature Energy, 2(10), 795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., & Chen, C.-F. (2019). Energy efficiency and energy justice for U.S. low-income households: An analysis of multifaceted challenges and potential. Energy Policy, 128, 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X. Y., Gonzalez, J. E., Shen, S. H., Miao, S. G., & Dou, J. X. (2018). Impacts of urbanization and air pollution on building energy demands—Beijing case study. Applied Energy, 225, 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W. Y., & Cao, X. S. (2018). Examining the effects of the neighborhood built environment on CO2 emissions from different residential trip purposes: A case study in Guangzhou, China. Cities, 81, 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahabi, S. A. H., Miranda-Moreno, L., Patterson, Z., Barla, P., & Harding, C. (2012). Transportation greenhouse gas emissions and its relationship with urban form, transit accessibility and emerging green technologies: A Montreal case study. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 966–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. L., Luo, L. Z., & Skitmore, M. (2015). Household carbon emission research: An analytical review of measurement, influencing factors and mitigation prospects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 873–883.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhen, W., Qin, Q. D., Zhong, Z. Q., Li, L., & Wei, Y. M. (2018). Uncovering household indirect energy-saving responsibility from a sectoral perspective: An empirical analysis of Guangdong, China. Energy Economics, 72, 451–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, K., & Yang, S. (2016). Understanding household energy consumption behavior: The contribution of energy big data analytics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 810–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z. H., Wang, C. D., Sun, X. H., Gao, F., Feng, W., & Zillante, G. (2018). Heating energy saving potential from building envelope design and operation optimization in residential buildings: A case study in northern China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, H., Brambley, M. R., & Morgan, R. P. (1983). Household energy consumption in the People’s Republic of China. Energy, 8(10), 763–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71622014, 41771564) and the National Statistical Research Program (2019LD09).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chu Wei.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Organization

Abb

Country

Organization

Abb

Country

Chinese Academy of Sciences

CAS

China

Australian National University

ANU

Australia

Beijing Institute of Technology

BIT

China

University of Melbourne

UOM

Australia

Beijing Normal University

BNU

China

Griffith University

GU

Australia

City University of Hong Kong

CityU

China

Monash University

U.Monash

Australia

Chongqing University

CQU

China

University of Western Australia

UWA

Australia

Lanzhou University

LZU

China

National Institute for Environmental Studies

NIES

Japan

Shandong University

SDU

China

Hiroshima University

HU

Japan

Zhejiang University

ZJU

China

Kyushu University

KU

Japan

University of Science and Technology of China

USTC

China

University of Tokyo

U.Tokyo

Japan

china university of mining and technology

CUMT

China

University of Cambridge

Cantab

UK

North China Electric Power University

NCEPU

China

University of Leeds

U.Leeds

UK

Shanghai Jiaotong University

SJTU

China

University of British Columbia

UBC

UK

Peking University

U.Peking

China

Leiden University

LEI

Netherlands

Tsinghua University

U.Tsinghua

China

Maastricht University

UM

Netherlands

Xiamen University

XMU

China

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

SFIT

Switzerland

Uiversity of California,Berkey

LBNL

USA

Università della Svizzera italiana

SUI

Switzerland

Harvard University

U.harvard

USA

University of Bonn

U.Bonn

Germany

University of Illinois

UIUC

USA

University of Oslo

U.Oslo

Norway

University of Maryland

UMD

USA

University of Lisbon

U.Lisbon

Portugal

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

IIASA

National University of Singapore

NUS

Singapore

Appendix 2

Literature

Author

Year

Journal

Topics

Air pollution: clean up our skies

J Schmale, etc

2014

Nature

Air pollution

Extreme air pollution from residential solid fuel burning

C Lin, etc

2018

Nature

Behaviour: Seeing heat saves energy

L Steg

2016

Nature Energy

Behavior/Intervention

Household behaviour crowds out support for climate change policy when sufficient progress is perceived

SH Werfel

2017

Nature Climate Change

Energy use behaviour: A window of opportunity

D Roy

2017

Nature Energy

Solar PV adoption: Incentives and behaviour

J Richler

2017

Nature

Energy Saving behaviour: Negative spillover to policy

KT Raimi

2017

Nature Climate Change

Efficacy of interventions targeting household air pollution from residential wood stoves

TJ Ward, etc

2017

Nature

Feel the nudge

N Dean

2018

Nature Energy

Renewable energy policy: Enumerating costs reduces support

D Evensen

2017

Nature Energy

Household electricity access a trivial contributor to CO2emissions growth in India

S Pachauri

2014

Nature Climate Change

Electricity

Factors affecting household satisfaction with electricity supply in rural India

M Aklin, etc

2016

Nature Energy

Electricity reliability: Willingness to pay in Nigeria

A Rubino

2017

Nature Energy

Exploring the impact of network tariffs on household electricity expenditures using load profiles and socio-economic characteristics

V Azarova, etc

2018

Nature Energy

Inaccurate consumer perceptions of monetary savings in a demand-side response programme predict programme acceptance

LV White, ND Sintov

2018

Nature Energy

Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns

BK Sovacool, etc

2016

Nature Energy

Energy poverty/justice/ equality

An index of inequality in China

D Guan

2017

Nature Energy

Energy poverty: Electrification and well-being

KR Sharma,etc

2016

Nature Energy

Measurement of inequality using household energy consumption data in rural China

S Wu, etc

2017

Nature Energy

Young, transient and cold

J Richler

2017

Nature Energy

Rethink fuel poverty as a complex problem

KJ Baker, etc

2018

Nature Energy

A penny for your preferences

F Khan

2017

Nature Energy

Fuelwood

The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels

R Bailis, etc

2015

Nature Climate Change

Impacts of global warming on residential heating and cooling degree-days in the United States

Y Petri, etc

2015

Scientific reports

Heating

Quantifying the economic impact of changes in energy demand for space heating and cooling systems under varying climatic scenarios

T Hasegawa, etc

2016

Palgrave Communications

Residential heating: What it takes to go green

E De Ranieri

2016

Nature Energy

The significance of relationships

K Burningham

2017

Nature Energy

The role of social norms/culture

Behavioral Science: Culture and climate action

L Zaval

2016

Nature Climate Change

The critical role of second-order normative beliefs in predicting energy conservation

JM Jachimowicz

2018

Nature Human Behavior

Public perceptions of demand-side management and a smarter energy future

A Spence

2015

Nature Climate Change

Energy demand

Residential energy demand: Consumption unzipped

N Dean

2016

Nature Energy

Making savings count

F Khan

2018

Nature Energy

Others

Quantifying the rural residential energy transition in China from 1992 to 2012 through a representative national survey

S Tao, etc

2018

Nature Energy

Healthy privilege

F Khan

2018

Nature Energy

Unequal household carbon footprints in China

D Wiedenhofer, etc

2017

Nature Climate Change

Energy efficiency to reduce residential electricity and natural gas use under climate change

JL Reyna, etc

2017

Nature Communications

Improving poverty and inequality modeling in climate research

ND Rao, etc

2017

Nature Climate Change

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, X., Wei, C. Household energy consumption: state of the art, research gaps, and future prospects. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 12479–12504 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01179-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01179-x

Keywords

Navigation