Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multi-criteria decision analysis for wind power plant location selection based on fuzzy AHP and geographic information systems

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to find the most suitable places for wind power plants by using geographic information systems (GIS) and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). To this purpose, a FAHP–GIS based model was developed with 17 main criteria and 81 sub-criteria relevant to wind power plants. These included a number of important criteria which have been ignored or not used to date in the wind power plant site selection studies in the literature. Weights showing the degree of importance of each criteria were calculated via the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method and integrated to the model. The geographic data for the sample study area were collected and processed via GIS, and a suitability map for wind power plants and restricted regions in the sample study area was generated by overlaying all the weighted maps. As a result of the study, restricted areas, the most suitable areas and less suitable areas for the study area were determined with the help of the suitability map created by introducing the new criteria. With this study, the proposed FAHP-GIS model, which is developed with the proposed new criteria, will provide more accurate results in the wind power plant site selection studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Eroğlu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 5 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for main criteria

5,

Table 6 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for main criteria

6,

Table 7 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for wind potential criteria

7,

Table 8 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for forested lands criteria

8,

Table 9 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for wetlands criteria

9,

Table 10 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for rocky lands criteria

10,

Table 11 The Fuzzy comparison numbers used for Residential criteria

11,

Table 12 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for slope criteria

12,

Table 13 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for distance to roads criteria

13,

Table 14 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for roughness criteria

14,

Table 15 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for distance to grids criteria

15,

Table 16 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for geology criteria

16,

Table 17 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for soil criteria

17,

Table 18 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for landslide criteria

18,

Table 19 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for bird migration paths criteria

19,

Table 20 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for recreation criteria

20,

Table 21 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for flora and fauna criteria

21,

Table 22 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for ice zone criteria

22,

Table 23 Fuzzy comparison numbers used for seismicity criteria

23, and

Table 24 Pairwise comparison numbers used for Table 4

24.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eroğlu, H. Multi-criteria decision analysis for wind power plant location selection based on fuzzy AHP and geographic information systems. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 18278–18310 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01438-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01438-5

Keywords

Navigation