Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable agricultural practices, farm income and food security among rural households in Africa

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture has been recognized in the literature as one of the important pathways to ensuring food and livelihood security among rural households in Africa. This study used data from the “Intensification of Food Crops Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (Afrint)” project to examine the impact of sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs)—zero tillage, intercropping, residue incorporation and animal manure—on farm income and food security (captured as self-sufficiency in food production—SSF) of rural households in Africa. The multinomial endogenous treatment effect method is applied to control for potential selection bias from observable and unobservable factors. In addition, the multivalued treatment effect model and dose–response functions are used to examine the treatment effects heterogeneity associated with the adoption of SAPs. The study revealed that joint adoption of SAPs increases farm income and food security relative to the adoption of a single practice or non-adoption. Households obtain significantly higher farm income and food security via the adoption of at least three practices relative to households adopting less than three practices. These findings reaffirm the notion that adopting SAPs as a package rather than single practice enables farm households to derive significant welfare benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We are aware of the potential endogeneity of income from off-farm employment. For this reason, observed values of off-farm income activities and their corresponding residuals from the first stage regression were incorporated into the main estimations. The results were, however, not significant and are not presented for purpose of brevity.

    .

  2. TC = [(MP*0.90*0.97) + (SP*0.90*0.97) + (RP*0.65*0.99) + (CP*0.85) with 0.90, 0.90, 0.65 and 0.85 as the milling ratios for millet, sorghum, rice and maize respectively and 0.97, 0.97 and 0.99 as the maize equivalent of millet, sorghum and rice on a milled basis respectively (Jolly & Gadbois 1996).

  3. The results in this table are not discussed due to space limitation.

References

  • Abdallah, A.-H. (2017). Determinants of adoption of soil and water and conservation techniques: Evidence from Northern Ghana. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Management and Informatics, 3(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdallah, A.-H., Abdul-Rahaman, A., & Issahaku, G. (2020). Production and hidden hunger impacts of sustainable agricultural practices: Evidence from rural households in Africa. Agrekon, 59(4), 440–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdul-Rahaman, A., Issahaku, G., & Zereyesus, Y. A. (2021). Improved rice variety adoption and farm production efficiency: Accounting for unobservable selection bias and technology gaps among smallholder farmers in Ghana. Technology in Society, 64, 101471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai, A. (2018). Simon Brand Memorial Address: The challenges and adaptation to climate change by farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Agrekon, 57(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annan, K., & Dryden, S. (2015). Food and the transformation of Africa: Getting smallholders connected. Foreign Affairs, 94(6), 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B., & Hochard, J. P. (2018). The impacts of climate change on the poor in disadvantaged regions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(1), 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H., & Pingali, P. (1988). Technological priorities for farming in Sub-Saharan Africa. The World Bank Research Observer, 3(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., & Gurgand, M. (2007). Selection bias corrections based on the multinomial logit model: Monte Carlo comparisons. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1), 174–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, M. D. (2010). Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability. Journal of Econometrics, 155(2), 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, G., Cyphers, D., & Phipps, T. (1993). Factors influencing the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 22(2), 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, P., & Trivedi, P. K. (2006a). Maximum simulated likelihood estimation of a negative binomial regression model with multinomial endogenous treatment. The Stata Journal, 6(2), 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, P., & Trivedi, P. K. (2006b). Specification and simulated likelihood estimation of a non-normal treatment-outcome model with selection: Application to health care utilization. Econometrics Journal, 9(1), 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Falco, S., & Veronesi, M. (2014). Managing environmental risk in presence of climate change: The role of adaptation in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(4), 553–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, B., & Barrett, C. B. (2017). Agricultural factor markets in Sub-Saharan Africa: An updated view with formal tests for market failure. Food Policy, 67(2), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehiakpor, D. S., Danso-Abbeam, G., & Mubashiru, Y. (2020). Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 101(June), 105142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erenstein, O. (2006). Intensification or extensification ? Factors affecting technology use in peri-urban lowlands along an agro-ecological gradient in West Africa. Agricultural Systems, 90(2), 132–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (1989). Sustainable Development and Natural Resources Management. In Twenty-Fifth Conference, (Paper C 89 ⁄ 2 – Supplement 2), 2–562. FAO, Rome.

  • Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontes, F. P. (2020). Soil and Water Conservation technology adoption and labour allocation: Evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 127(3), 104754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2002). Econometric Analysis. In R. Banister, P. J. Boardman, G. Soto, M. McHale, C. Regan, & M. Reynolds (Eds.). Prentice Hall.

  • Guardabascio, B., & Ventura, M. (2014). Estimating the dose-response function through a generalized linear model approach. The Stata Journal, 14(1), 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issahaku, G., & Abdulai, A. (2019). Can farm households improve food and nutrition security through adoption of climate-smart practices ? Empirical evidence from Northern Ghana. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppz002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, B. K. (2013). Market inefficiencies and the adoption of agricultural technologies in developing countries. In White paper, Agricultural Technology Adoption Initiative. Berkeley.

  • Jolly, C. M., & Gadbois, M. (1996). The effect of animal traction on labour productivity and food self-sufficiency: The case of Mali. Agricultural Systems, 51(4), 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassie, M., Marenya, P., Tessema, Y., Jaleta, M., Zeng, D., Erenstein, O., & Rahut, D. (2018). Measuring farm and market level economic impacts of improved maize production technologies in Ethiopia: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(1), 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassie, M., Teklewold, H., & Jaleta, M. (2015). Understanding the adoption of a portfolio of sustainable intensification practices in eastern and southern Africa. Land Use Policy, 42(1), 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirui, O. K., & Mirzabaev, A. (2015). Drivers of land degradation and adoption of multiple sustainable land management practices. In International Conference of Agricultural Economists (ICAE), Agriculture in the Interconnected World, 1–61. Retrieved 08, Jan 2021 from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/212008/2/Kirui-Driversoflanddegradationandadoptionofmultiplesustainablelandmanagementpractices-1021.pdf

  • Lele, U., Masters, W. A., Kinabo, J., Meenakshi, J. V., Ramaswami, B., Tagwireyi, J., Goswami, S. (2016). Measuring Food and Nutrition Security: An Independent Technical Assessment and User’s Guide for Existing Indicators.

  • Makate, C., Makate, M., & Mango, N. (2017). Sustainable agriculture practices and livelihoods in pro-poor smallholder farming systems in southern Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 9(3), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manda, J., Alene, A. D., Gardebroek, C., Kassie, M., & Tembo, G. (2016). Adoption and impacts of sustainable agricultural practices on maize yields and incomes: Evidence from rural Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(1), 130–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morugán-Coronado, A., Linares, C., Gómez-López, M. D., Faz, Á., & Zornoza, R. (2020). The impact of intercropping, tillage and fertilizer type on soil and crop yield in fruit orchards under Mediterranean conditions: A meta-analysis of field studies. Agricultural Systems, 178, 102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEPAD. (2003). Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme. http://www.nepad.org

  • Pieters, Hannah, Andrea Guariso, & Vandeplas, A. (2013). Conceptual framework for the analysis of the determinants of food and nutrition security (pp. 1–36).

  • Sanz, M. J., Vente, J. de, Chotte, J.-L., Bernoux, M., Kust, G., Ruiz, I., Akhtar-Schuster, M. (2017). Sustainable Land Management contribution to successful land- based climate change adaptation and mitigation. A Report of the Science-Policy Interface. Bonn, Germany.

  • Sardar, A., Kiani, A. K., & Kuslu, Y. (2020). Does adoption of climate: smart agriculture ( CSA ) practices improve farmers ’ crop income ? Assessing the determinants and its impacts in Punjab province, Pakistan. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01049-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summit-Malabo, A. U. (2014). Malabo declaration on accelerated agricultural growth and transformation for shared prosperity and improved livelihoods. African Union, 1, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambo, J. A., & Mockshell, J. (2018). Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household income in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ecological Economics, 151(1), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., & Shiferaw, B. (2013a). Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 597–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., Shiferaw, B., & Köhlin, G. (2013b). Cropping system diversification, conservation tillage and modern seed adoption in Ethiopia: Impacts on household income, agrochemical use and demand for labor. Ecological Economics, 93, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfaye, W., Tirivayi, N., Blalock, G., Bageant, L., Boone, C., Mcbride, L., & Lybbert, T. (2020). Climate-smart innovations and rural poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring impacts and pathways. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A., & Metz, M. (1998). Implications of Economic Policy for Food Security: A Training Manual. Retrieved March 29, 2021, from Training Materials for Agricultural Planning 40 website: http://www.fao.org/3/X3936E/X3936E03.htm#self

  • WFP. (2009). Comprehensive food security & vulnerability analysis (CFSVA). . Republic of Ghana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zero Hunger Challenge. (2016). Partnering for nourishing our people, nurturing our planet, growing prosperity, harvesting peace transforming our food systems to transform our world background. Zero Hunger Challenge, 2(6), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul-Hanan Abdallah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables

Table 5 Determinants of household adoption of SAPs in Africa

5,

Table 6 Test of instrument validity (pooled sample)

6,

Table 7 Test of instrument validity (Eastern Africa)

7,

Table 8 Test of instrument validity (West Africa)

8,

Table 9 Test of instrument validity (Southern Africa)

9,

Table 10 Hausman tests of IIA assumption (Eastern Africa)

10,

Table 11 Hausman tests of IIA assumption (Western Africa)

11,

Table 12 Hausman tests of IIA assumption (Southern Africa)

12 and

Table 13 AIPW estimates of effect adoption m relative to non-adoption l

13.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdallah, AH., Abdul-Rahaman, A. & Issahaku, G. Sustainable agricultural practices, farm income and food security among rural households in Africa. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 17668–17701 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01407-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01407-y

Keywords

Navigation