Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the challenges to, and opportunities for, increasing sustainable development (SD) co-benefits delivered by clean development mechanism (CDM) wind power projects in northeastern Brazil and the resulting implications for climate and energy policies. Five methodological phases were met: First, a documentary research was conducted in the main CDM database; second was a literature review, creating the analytical framework and a survey questionnaire needed to assess the SD co-benefits from the projects; third, documentary research was used to enable ex-ante analysis of the SD co-benefits proposed in the CDM Project Design Documents (PDDs); fourth, survey allowed for the analysis of SD co-benefits perceived by project entrepreneurs (ex-post analysis); and finally, a comparison between the ex-ante and ex-post analyses was completed. The results show the importance of carrying out SD co-benefit studies after the implementation of CDM projects in order to learn lessons for new mechanisms of climate governance. The lowest SD co-benefits were water management improvement in the project influence area, soil pollution prevention, health and safety improvements and technology transfer. The greatest opportunities for increasing SD co-benefits come from the environmental licensing process and the strengthening of Corporate Social Responsibility. The greatest challenges are new technology development, stakeholders’ engagement and SD co-benefit audits. We conclude that the improvement of multi-level climate and energy governance plays a key role in increasing SD co-benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Associação Brasileira de Energia Eólica (ABEEolica). (2016). Re: Information about wind farms. [online] Personal message with attached spreadsheet sent to the first author. 28 Jan. 2016.
Associação Brasileira de Energia Eólica (ABEEolica). (2019). 2018 Annual wind power generation report. Recovered in: 05 Nov. 2019, From: http://abeeolica.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Boletim-Anual_2018_Ingl%C3%AAs.pdf.
Aitken, M. (2010). Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy, 38, 6066–6075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.062
Andrade, J. C. S., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2014). The role of the private sector in global climate and energy governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2235-3
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2017). Future carbon fund: Delivering co-benefits for sustainable development. Recovered in: 18 Dec. 2017 From: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/389821/future-carbon-fund.pdf.
Bajoji, S. (2016). Socio-economic and environmental assessment of wind energy projects. Asian Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25540.53129
Baxter, J., Morzaria, R., & Hirsch, R. (2013). A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict. Energy Policy, 61, 931–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.050
Benites-Lazaro, L. L., & Andrade, C. (2019). Clean development mechanism: Key lessons and challenges in mitigating climate change and achieving sustainable development. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-409548-9.11863-9
Benites-Lazaro, L. L., & Mello-Théry, N. A. (2017). CSR as a legitimatizing tool in carbon market: evidence from Latin America’s clean development mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.095
Benites-Lazaro, L. L., & Mello-Théry, N. A. (2019). Empowering communities? Local stakeholders’ participation in the clean development mechanism in Latin America. World Development, 114, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.10.005
Benites-Lazaro, L. L., Gremaud, P. A., & Benites, L. A. (2018). Business responsibility regarding climate change in Latin America: An empirical analysis from clean development mechanism (CDM) project developers. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(2), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.02.011
Borden, R. J. (2017). Psychological dimensions of sustainability: Minding the future from a human-ecological perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 25, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.07.006
Borrelli, I. P. (2016). Territorial sustainability and multifunctional agriculture: a case study. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.046
Brasil (2015). Intended nationally determined contribution—Towards achieving the objective of the United nations framework convention on climate change. Recovered in: 06 Jan. 2019 From: https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/submissions.aspx.
Brown, K. B. (2011). Wind power in northeastern Brazil: lOcal burdens, regional benefits and growing opposition. Climate and Development, 3(4), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2011.628120
Costa-Júnior, A., Pasini, K., & Andrade, C. (2013). Clean development mechanism in Brazil: An instrument for technology transfer and the promotion of cleaner technologies? Journal of Cleaner Production, 46, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.044
Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (EPE). (2019). Balanço Energético Nacional 2019: relatório síntese / ano base 2018. Rio de Janeiro: EPE, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.epe.gov.br/pt/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/balanco-energetico-nacional-2019. (in Portuguese)
Fernández, L., Bogo, J., Lumbreras, J., & Andrade, J. C. S. (2012). Exploring co-benefits of clean development mechanism projects: Lessons learned from Santa Catarina – Brazil. The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, 3, 121–142.
Fernández, L., de la Sota, C., Andrade, J. C., Lumbreras, J., & Mazorra, J. (2014). Social development benefits of hydroelectricity CDM Projects in Brazil. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.909901
Hammer, J., & Pivo, G. (2016). The triple bottom line and sustainable economic development theory and practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242416674808
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015). Energy and climate change: World energy outlook special report. Recovered in: 06 Jan. 2016 From: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2015SpecialReportonEnergyandClimateChange.pdf.
International Energy Agency (IEA). (2018). Renewables 2018: Analysis and forecasts to 2023. Recovered in: 05 Nov. 2019 From: https://www.iea.org/renewables2018/.
International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2019). A new world: Geopolitics of the energy transformation. Recovered in: 05 Nov. 2019 From: https://geopoliticsofrenewables.org/assets/geopolitics/Reports/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Global_commission_renewable_energy_2019.pdf.
Isil, O., & Hernke, M. T. (2017). The triple bottom line: A critical review from a transdisciplinary perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1235–1251. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1982
Jörgensen, K., Jogesh, A., & Mishra, A. (2015). Multi-level climate governance and the role of the subnational level. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12(4), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815x.2015.1096797
Karakosta, C., Marinakis, V., Letsou, P., & Psarras, J. (2013). Does the CDM offer sustainable development benefits or not? International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20(1), 1–8.
Kattumuri, R., & Kruse, T. (2017). Renewable technologies in Karnataka, India: Jobs potential and co-benefits. Climate and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1410085
Lazaro, L. L. B., & Gremaud, A. P. (2017). Contribuição para o desenvolvimento sustentável dos projetos de mecanismo de desenvolvimento limpo na América Latina. O&S - Salvador, 24(80), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-9230803 (in Portuguese).
Lewis, J. I. (2010). The evolving role of carbon finance in promoting renewable energy development in China. Energy Policy, 38, 2875–2886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.020
Ma, Z., Xue, B., Geng, Y., Ren, W., Fujita, T., Zhang, Z., Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Jacques, D. A., & Xi, F. (2013). Co-benefits analysis on climate change and environmental effects of wind-power: A case study from Xinjiang, China. Renewable Energy, 57, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.018
Mathur, V. N., Afionis, S., Paavola, J., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2013). Experiences of host communities with carbon market projects: Towards multi-level climate justice. Climate Policy, 14(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.861728
McDowall, W., Ekins, P., Radošević, S., & Zhang, L. (2013). The development of wind power in China, Europe and the USA: How have policies and innovation system activities co-evolved. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(2), 163–185.
Mori-Clement, Y. (2019). Impacts of CDM projects on sustainable development: Improving living standards across Brazilian municipalities? World Development, 113, 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.014
Munday, M., Bristow, G., & Cowell, R. (2011). Wind farms in rural areas: How far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? Journal of Rural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.08.003
Murata, A., Liang, J., Eto, R., Tokimatsu, K., Okajimad, K., & Uchiyamad, Y. (2016). Environmental co-benefits of the promotion of renewable power generation in China and India through clean development mechanisms. Renewable Energy, 87, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.046
Olsen, K. H. (2007). The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: A review of the literature. Climate Change, 84, 59–73.
Olsen, K. H., Arens, C., & Mersmann, F. (2017). Learning from CDM SD tool experience for Article 6.4 of the Paris agreement. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1277686
Paiva, D. S., Fernández, L. G., Ventura, A. C., Alvarez, G., & Andrade, J. C. S. (2015). Mercado Voluntário de Carbono: análise de co-benefícios de projetos brasileiros. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Rio de Janeiro, 19(1), 45–64. (in Portuguese).
Rehme, J., Nordigården, D., & Chicksand, D. (2015). Public policy and electrical-grid sector innovation. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9(4), 565–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-01-2015-0002
Rezaee, Z. (2016). Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.05.003
Schreurs, M. (2017). Multi-level climate governance in China. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1751
Shaw, C. (2016). The role of rights, risks and responsibilities in the climate justice debate. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 8(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2014-0127
Silva, A. C., Jr., Andrade, J. C. S., Telesforo, A. C., Farias, L., Rocha, A., & Ramos, E. (2011). Políticas públicas, tecnologias mais limpas e desenvolvimento sustentável: um estudo de projetos de MDL em parques eólicos no Brasil. Reuna, 16(2), 103–120. (in Portuguese).
Silva, A. C., Jr., Andrade, J. C. S., Leao, E. B. S., & Wu, D. D. (2013a). Sustainable development and cleaner technology in brazilian energy CDM projects: Consideration of risks. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 19(5), 1338–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2012.729400
Silva, N. F., Rosa, L. P., Freitas, M. A. V., & Pereira, M. G. (2013b). Wind power in Brazil: From the power sector’s expansion crisis model to the favorable environment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 686–697.
Simas, M., & Pacca, S. (2013). Energia eólica, geração de empregos e desenvolvimento sustentável. Estudos Avançados, 27(77), 99–116. (in Portuguese).
Soini, K., & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture-sustainability relation: towards a conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8, 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167
Subbarao, S., & Lloyd, B. (2011). Can the clean development mechanism (CDM) deliver? Energy Policy, 39(3), 1600–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.036
Sun, Q., Xu, B., Wennersten, R., & Brandt, N. (2010). Co-benefits of CDM projects and policy implications. Environmental Economics, 1(2), 78–88.
Tait, L. (2012). The potential for local community benefits from wind farms in South Africa. Thesis (Energy Research Centre). University of Cape Town. Retrieved from http://open.uct.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11427/11991/thesis_ebe_2012_tait_l.pdf?sequence=1.
Tang, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2014). Renewable energy investment in emerging markets: Evaluating improvements to the clean development mechanism. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 2(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.2014.02.0014
Torinelli, V. H., Silva, A. F. A., Jr., & Andrade, J. C. S. (2018). Wind power energy in Brazil: Public financing and future perspectives. Latin American Journal of Management for Sustainable Development, 4(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1504/LAJMSD.2018.091325
UNEP DTU Partnership (2018). CDM pipeline. Recovered in 26 Jun. 2018, From: http://www.cdmpipeline.org/.
United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2012a). Benefits of the clean development mechanism. Recovered in: 01 Nov. 2015, From: https://cdm.unfccc.int/about/dev_ben/ABC_2012.pdf.
United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2012b). Sustainable development co-benefits tool (SD Tool). Recovered in: 11 Jan. 2016, From: https://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/tools/index.html.
United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement, 2015. Recovered in: 03 Jun. 2017, From: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.
United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2018a). CDM sustainable development co-benefits. Recovered in: 01 Sept. 18 From: https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/sdcmicrosite/Pages/SD-Reports.aspx.
United Nations Framework Conventions on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2018b). Achievements of the CDM. Harnessing incentive for climate action, 2001–2018. Recovered in: 05 Sept. 2018 From: https://unfccc.int/documents/181797.
Ventura, A., Farias, L. G. Q., Paiva, D., Alvarez, G., & Andrade, J. C. S. (2015). Carbon market and global climate governance: Limitations and challenges. International Journal Innovation and Sustainable Development, 9(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2015.067347
Xue, B., Ma, Z., Geng, Y., Heck, P., Ren, W., & Tobias, M. (2015). A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.056
Żak, A. (2015). Triple bottom line concept in theory and practice. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2015.387.21
Zhou, Y., Li, Y. P., & Huang, G. H. (2015). Planning sustainable electric-power system with carbon emission abatement through CDM under uncertainty. Applied Energy., 140, 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.057
Funding
This work was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq) [Grant Number 475656/2013-0] and the Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Góes, M.F.B., Andrade, J.C.S., Jabbour, C.J.C. et al. Wind power projects in Brazil: challenges and opportunities increasing co-benefits and implications for climate and energy policies. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 15341–15367 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01300-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01300-8