Skip to main content
Log in

Testing a tridimensional model of sustainable behavior: self-care, caring for others, and caring for the planet

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the dimensions of sustainable behavior, with a particular focus on the aspects of self-care, caring for others, and caring for the environment. Its aim was to test the assumption that sustainable behavior not only encompasses pro-social and pro-environmental actions, as the current research acknowledges, but also behaviors that are directed toward self-preservation and care. A subscale of self-care specifically developed for this research was added to a series of previously validated instruments assessing altruistic, equitable, pro-ecological, and frugal behaviors to examine the personal, social, and physical environmental aspects of sustainable behavior. Responses from a sample of 290 participants confirmed the three-dimensional structure of sustainable behavior. Results suggest sustainability, understood as a chain of interdependences between the individual, society, and nature, begins with self-care and continues with caring for others, and with caring for the biosphere, which, in turn, affords for a more sustainable environment for the individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anđić, D., & Vorkapić, S. T. (2014). Interdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development in higher education a case study from Croatia. In K. Thomas & H. E. Muga (Eds.), Handbook of research on pedagogical innovations for sustainable development (pp. 67–115). Hershey PA: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, R., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2013). Happiness and sustainable behavior. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Van Broek, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2017). Individual differences in values determine the relative effectiveness of biospheric, economic and combined appeals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carfora, V., Caso, D., Sparks, P., & Conner, M. (2017). Moderating effects of pro-environmental self-identity on pro-environmental intentions and behaviour: A multi-behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmi, N., & Arnon, S. (2014). The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society and Natural Resources, 27(12), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.928393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie, D. (2004). How to stop worrying and start living. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONAPO (2010). Metodología de estimación del índice de marginación urbana. Retrieved from: http://www.conapo.gob.mx/work/models/CONAPO/Resource/862/4/images/06_C_AGEB.pdf.

  • Christopher, J. C., Christopher, S. E., Dunnagan, T., & Schure, M. (2006). Teaching self-care through mindfulness practices: The application of yoga, meditation, and qigong to counselor training. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46(4), 494–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: towards a new human interdependence paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40, 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507308786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Frías, M., & García, C. (2010). Introduction to the psychological dimensions of sustainability. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Ortiz-Valdez, A. (2015). On the Relationship between character strengths and sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47, 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514530718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo, V. (2012). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fopka-Kowalczyk, M., & Krajnik, M. (2019). Expectations and self-care of family members in palliative care. The analysis of needs and workshop plan. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, 2(29), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes-George, K. (2016). Between preservation and exploitation. Transnational advocacy networks and conservation in developing countries. London: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstman, B. (2014). Basic biostatistics (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, M. (2000). Care as a goal of democratic education. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/713679392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grise-Owens, E., Miller, J., Escobar-Ratliff, L., & George, N. (2018). Teaching note: Teaching self-care and wellness as a professional practice skill: A curricular case example. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(1), 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (2001). As três ecologias. Campinas. São Paulo, 1–56. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:As+tr?s+ecologias#0

  • Hansmann, B. L. (1997). Con los pies en el suelo. Forma del cuerpo y visión del mundo [With your feet on your ground. Body shape and worldview]. Barcelona: Icaria Milenrama.

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Bingley UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Moshagen, M., & Heydasch, T. (2013). Tracing the path from personality: via cooperativeness—to conservation. European Journal of Personality, 27, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz, R., Frickmann, H., & Krüger, A. (2019). Climate change and infectious diseases. In M. Palocz-Andresen, D. Szalay, A. Gosztom, L. Sípos, & T. Taligás (Eds.), International climate protection (pp. 269–276). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K., & Kristjánsson, K. (2017). Sustainability, virtue ethics, and the virtue of harmony with nature. Environmental Education Research, 23, 1205–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juárez-Nájera, M., Rivera-Martínez, J. G., & Hafkamp, W. A. (2010). An explorative socio-psychological model for determining sustainable behavior: Pilot study in German and Mexican universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 686–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Byrka, K. (2011). Environmentalism as a trait: Gauging people’s prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.516830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific 766 composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(767), 1531–1544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205103771800013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & Piccolo, J. J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloro-Bidart, T., & Semenko, K. (2017). Toward a feminist ethic of self-care for environmental educators. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1249324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lulfs, R., & Hahn, R. (2014). Sustainable behavior in the business sphere: A comprehensive overview of the explanatory power of psychological models. Organization and Environment, 27(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614522631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumber, M., Richardson, R., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., Oliveira, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15623–15628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neaman, A., Otto, S., & Vinokur, E. (2018). Toward an integrated approach to environmental and prosocial education. Sustainability, 10(3), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J. M., & Schultz, P. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior and environmental action. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 626–652). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orem, D. E. (1993). Modelo de Orem: Conceptos de enfermería en la práctica [Orem’s model: Concepts of nursing in practice]. Barcelona: Masson Salvat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, N. (2018). Sustaining spirit. Self-care for social justice. Berkeley, CA: Reclamation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegel, B., Moser, D., Buck, H., Dickson, V., Dunbar, S., et al. (2017). Self-Care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke. A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(9), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ro, M., Brauer, M., Kuntz, K., Shukla, R., & Bensch, I. (2017). Making Cool Choices for sustainability: Testing the effectiveness of a game-based approach to promoting pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruger, J. P. (2004). Health and social justice. The Lancet, 364(9439), 1075–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sudo, K., Kobayashi, J., Noda, S., Fukuda, Y., & Takahashi, K. (2018). Japan’s healthcare policy for the elderly through the concepts of self-help (Ji-jo), mutual aid (Go-jo), social solidarity care (Kyo-jo), and governmental care (Ko-jo). Bioscience trends, 12(1), 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Durón-Ramos, M. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: A measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5(2), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobón, O. (2015). El Autocuidado, una Habilidad para Vivir [Self-care, a skill for living]. Hacia la Promocion de la Salud, 8(1), 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). Cooperation and competition. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 296–300). Washington, DC, New York: American Psychological Association & Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetich, J., & Nelson, M. (2010). Sustainability: Virtuous or vulgar? BioScience, 60, 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.7.9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2007). Thinking as natural: Another look at human exemptionalism. Human Ecology Review, 14(2), 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, E. H., Hersh, M. A., & Gibson, C. M. (2012). Ethics, self-care and well-being for psychologists: Reenvisioning the stress-distress continuum. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(5), 487–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J., Haas, E., & McGown, E. (2010). Coyote’s guide to connecting with nature. Shelton, WA: OWLink Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. S., Wood, C. L., Kilpatrick, A. M., Lafferty, K. D., Nunn, C. L., & Vincent, J. R. (2017). Conservation, biodiversity and infectious disease: Scientific evidence and policy implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 20160124. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2011). Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19761–19766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor Corral-Verdugo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corral-Verdugo, V., Pato, C. & Torres-Soto, N. Testing a tridimensional model of sustainable behavior: self-care, caring for others, and caring for the planet. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 12867–12882 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01189-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01189-9

Keywords

Navigation