Abstract
This paper investigates the dimensions of sustainable behavior, with a particular focus on the aspects of self-care, caring for others, and caring for the environment. Its aim was to test the assumption that sustainable behavior not only encompasses pro-social and pro-environmental actions, as the current research acknowledges, but also behaviors that are directed toward self-preservation and care. A subscale of self-care specifically developed for this research was added to a series of previously validated instruments assessing altruistic, equitable, pro-ecological, and frugal behaviors to examine the personal, social, and physical environmental aspects of sustainable behavior. Responses from a sample of 290 participants confirmed the three-dimensional structure of sustainable behavior. Results suggest sustainability, understood as a chain of interdependences between the individual, society, and nature, begins with self-care and continues with caring for others, and with caring for the biosphere, which, in turn, affords for a more sustainable environment for the individual.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anđić, D., & Vorkapić, S. T. (2014). Interdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development in higher education a case study from Croatia. In K. Thomas & H. E. Muga (Eds.), Handbook of research on pedagogical innovations for sustainable development (pp. 67–115). Hershey PA: IGI Global.
Bechtel, R., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2013). Happiness and sustainable behavior. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
Den Van Broek, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2017). Individual differences in values determine the relative effectiveness of biospheric, economic and combined appeals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.009.
Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.
Carfora, V., Caso, D., Sparks, P., & Conner, M. (2017). Moderating effects of pro-environmental self-identity on pro-environmental intentions and behaviour: A multi-behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.001.
Carmi, N., & Arnon, S. (2014). The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society and Natural Resources, 27(12), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.928393.
Carnegie, D. (2004). How to stop worrying and start living. New York: Simon and Schuster.
CONAPO (2010). Metodología de estimación del índice de marginación urbana. Retrieved from: http://www.conapo.gob.mx/work/models/CONAPO/Resource/862/4/images/06_C_AGEB.pdf.
Christopher, J. C., Christopher, S. E., Dunnagan, T., & Schure, M. (2006). Teaching self-care through mindfulness practices: The application of yoga, meditation, and qigong to counselor training. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 46(4), 494–509.
Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: towards a new human interdependence paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40, 703–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507308786.
Corral-Verdugo, V., Frías, M., & García, C. (2010). Introduction to the psychological dimensions of sustainability. In V. Corral, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia-Fonllem, C., & Ortiz-Valdez, A. (2015). On the Relationship between character strengths and sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47, 877–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514530718.
Corral-Verdugo, V. (2012). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8.
Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001.
De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00181.
Fopka-Kowalczyk, M., & Krajnik, M. (2019). Expectations and self-care of family members in palliative care. The analysis of needs and workshop plan. Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych, 2(29), 91–110.
Fuentes-George, K. (2016). Between preservation and exploitation. Transnational advocacy networks and conservation in developing countries. London: MIT Press.
Gerstman, B. (2014). Basic biostatistics (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566.
Gregory, M. (2000). Care as a goal of democratic education. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/713679392.
Grise-Owens, E., Miller, J., Escobar-Ratliff, L., & George, N. (2018). Teaching note: Teaching self-care and wellness as a professional practice skill: A curricular case example. Journal of Social Work Education, 54(1), 180–186.
Guattari, F. (2001). As três ecologias. Campinas. São Paulo, 1–56. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:As+tr?s+ecologias#0
Hansmann, B. L. (1997). Con los pies en el suelo. Forma del cuerpo y visión del mundo [With your feet on your ground. Body shape and worldview]. Barcelona: Icaria Milenrama.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Bingley UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Moshagen, M., & Heydasch, T. (2013). Tracing the path from personality: via cooperativeness—to conservation. European Journal of Personality, 27, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1856.
Hinz, R., Frickmann, H., & Krüger, A. (2019). Climate change and infectious diseases. In M. Palocz-Andresen, D. Szalay, A. Gosztom, L. Sípos, & T. Taligás (Eds.), International climate protection (pp. 269–276). Cham: Springer.
Jordan, K., & Kristjánsson, K. (2017). Sustainability, virtue ethics, and the virtue of harmony with nature. Environmental Education Research, 23, 1205–1229.
Juárez-Nájera, M., Rivera-Martínez, J. G., & Hafkamp, W. A. (2010). An explorative socio-psychological model for determining sustainable behavior: Pilot study in German and Mexican universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 686–694.
Kaiser, F. G., & Byrka, K. (2011). Environmentalism as a trait: Gauging people’s prosocial personality in terms of environmental engagement. International Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.516830.
Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific 766 composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(767), 1531–1544.
Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205103771800013.
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & Piccolo, J. J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127.
Lloro-Bidart, T., & Semenko, K. (2017). Toward a feminist ethic of self-care for environmental educators. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1249324.
Lulfs, R., & Hahn, R. (2014). Sustainable behavior in the business sphere: A comprehensive overview of the explanatory power of psychological models. Organization and Environment, 27(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614522631.
Lumber, M., Richardson, R., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186.
Moll, J., Krueger, F., Zahn, R., Pardini, M., Oliveira, R., & Grafman, J. (2006). Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15623–15628.
Neaman, A., Otto, S., & Vinokur, E. (2018). Toward an integrated approach to environmental and prosocial education. Sustainability, 10(3), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030583.
Nolan, J. M., & Schultz, P. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior and environmental action. In D. A. Schroeder & W. G. Graziano (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 626–652). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Orem, D. E. (1993). Modelo de Orem: Conceptos de enfermería en la práctica [Orem’s model: Concepts of nursing in practice]. Barcelona: Masson Salvat.
Ortiz, N. (2018). Sustaining spirit. Self-care for social justice. Berkeley, CA: Reclamation Press.
Riegel, B., Moser, D., Buck, H., Dickson, V., Dunbar, S., et al. (2017). Self-Care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke. A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Journal of the American Heart Association, 6(9), 1–27.
Ro, M., Brauer, M., Kuntz, K., Shukla, R., & Bensch, I. (2017). Making Cool Choices for sustainability: Testing the effectiveness of a game-based approach to promoting pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.007.
Ruger, J. P. (2004). Health and social justice. The Lancet, 364(9439), 1075–1080.
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.
Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & P. W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sudo, K., Kobayashi, J., Noda, S., Fukuda, Y., & Takahashi, K. (2018). Japan’s healthcare policy for the elderly through the concepts of self-help (Ji-jo), mutual aid (Go-jo), social solidarity care (Kyo-jo), and governmental care (Ko-jo). Bioscience trends, 12(1), 7–11.
Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Durón-Ramos, M. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: A measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5(2), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711.
Tobón, O. (2015). El Autocuidado, una Habilidad para Vivir [Self-care, a skill for living]. Hacia la Promocion de la Salud, 8(1), 38–50.
Van Lange, P. A. M. (2000). Cooperation and competition. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 296–300). Washington, DC, New York: American Psychological Association & Oxford University Press.
Vucetich, J., & Nelson, M. (2010). Sustainability: Virtuous or vulgar? BioScience, 60, 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.7.9.
Williams, J. (2007). Thinking as natural: Another look at human exemptionalism. Human Ecology Review, 14(2), 130–139.
Wise, E. H., Hersh, M. A., & Gibson, C. M. (2012). Ethics, self-care and well-being for psychologists: Reenvisioning the stress-distress continuum. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(5), 487–494.
Young, J., Haas, E., & McGown, E. (2010). Coyote’s guide to connecting with nature. Shelton, WA: OWLink Media.
Young, H. S., Wood, C. L., Kilpatrick, A. M., Lafferty, K. D., Nunn, C. L., & Vincent, J. R. (2017). Conservation, biodiversity and infectious disease: Scientific evidence and policy implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372, 20160124. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0124.
Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2011). Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19761–19766.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corral-Verdugo, V., Pato, C. & Torres-Soto, N. Testing a tridimensional model of sustainable behavior: self-care, caring for others, and caring for the planet. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 12867–12882 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01189-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01189-9