Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface water treatment plants are major energy consumers in all countries. In recent years, the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels and the growth in demand for energy resulting from the needs of development have prompted optimisation of the use of energy. SWTPs are responsible for the supply of treated water to consumers. Although a significant amount of the total energy produced is consumed by WTPs, the utilisation of this resource is variable, and sufficient amounts of it remain unutilised or wasted in the treatment process. Energy resources supplied to a WTP must be optimally allocated. At present, no mechanism exists to ensure this, and allocation is performed as and when it is needed, with no regulation or control. As a result, much energy is returned unutilised. This results in excess expenditures and affects carbon emissions from the plant because both too much and too little utilisation of energy in running water treatment equipment can result in the generation of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. Unnecessary consumption of energy reduces its availability for other users. Thus, the economy, the environment, and social well-being are affected by the non-optimal utilisation of energy. This problem is common to all parts of the world but is especially acute in developing countries. Lack of intelligent allocation methods compromises the sustainability not only of the plant but also of the dependent population. Here, nature-based optimisation algorithms (OAs) and a modified analytical hierarchy process (mAHP), an objective multi-criteria decision-making method, were utilised to conduct intelligent, automatic allocation of energy among elements of wastewater treatment plants (WTPs). OAs are used to weight elements according to their relative capacity to ensure reliability and restrict risk to plants (resulting in a reliability–risk index); energy is allocated accordingly using mAHP. Tested at a working WTP in India, it minimised energy wastage down to 0.037% of total energy. This is the first attempt to combine mAHP and aggregated output from two OAs to optimise energy use in a WTP (based on the novel reliability–risk index). Our method builds on the concepts of multi-criteria decision making and metaheuristics optimisation algorithms to develop a new procedure for cognitive allocation of energy ensuring optimal performance while minimising the use of energy. Our decision support system can help maximise productivity, and safeguard sustainability, of plants and their stakeholders. However, time-dependent, nonlinear dynamics in continuously operating WTPs should be tested in future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-Elazim, S. M., & Ali, E. S. (2018). Load frequency controller design of a two-area system composing of PV grid and thermal generator via firefly algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications,30(2), 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, N., Othman, M. A., Husain, M., & Misran, M. H. (2014). A review of firefly algorithm. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 9(10), 1732–1736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asl, P. F., Monjezi, M., Hamidi, J. K., & Armaghani, D. J. (2018). Optimization of flyrock and rock fragmentation in the Tajareh limestone mine using metaheuristics method of firefly algorithm. Engineering with Computers,34(2), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertanza, G., Canato, M., & Laera, G. (2018). Towards energy self-sufficiency and integral material recovery in waste water treatment plants: Assessment of upgrading options. Journal of Cleaner Production,170, 1206–1218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castellet-Viciano, L., Hernández-Chover, V., & Hernández-Sancho, F. (2018). Modelling the energy costs of the wastewater treatment process: The influence of the aging factor. Science of the Total Environment,625, 363–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chae, K. J., & Kang, J. (2013). Estimating the energy independence of a municipal wastewater treatment plant incorporating green energy resources. Energy Conversion and Management,75, 664–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, P., Baeyens, E., & Khargonekar, P. P. (2018). Cost causation-based allocations of costs for market integration of renewable energy. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,33(1), 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, C., & Carter, N. T. (2017). Energy-water Nexus: The water sector’s energy use. CRS Report, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43200.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2018

  • D’Inverno, G., Carosi, L., Romano, G., & Guerrini, A. (2018). Water pollution in wastewater treatment plants: An efficiency analysis with undesirable output. European Journal of Operational Research,269(1), 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., Biswas, A., Dasgupta, S., & Abraham, A. (2009). Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: Theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. In Foundations of computational intelligence (Vol. 3, pp. 23–55). Berlin: Springer

  • Deaconu, S. I., Babău, R., Popa, G. N., & Gherman, P. L. (2018, January). Hydroelectric power plant with variable flow on drinking water adduction. In IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering (Vol. 294, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing.

  • Department of Information Engineering and Mathematical Sciences (DIEMS) (2018). University Of Siena,Notes on AHP, http://www.dii.unisi.it/~mocenni/Note_AHP.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2018

  • Dinar, A., Rosegrant, M. W., & Meinzen-Dick, R. S. (1997). Water allocation mechanisms: Principles and examples (No 1779). Washington: World Bank Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faradonbeh, R. S., Armaghani, D. J., Amnieh, H. B., & Mohamad, E. T. (2018). Prediction and minimization of blast-induced flyrock using gene expression programming and firefly algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications,29(6), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process—An exposition. Operations Research,49(4), 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, C., Zang, W., Guo, W., Qian, Z., et al. (2018). Payments for ecosystem services for watershed water resource allocations. Journal of Hydrology,556, 689–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gémar, G., Gómez, T., Molinos-Senante, M., Caballero, R., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2018). Assessing changes in eco-productivity of wastewater treatment plants: The role of costs, pollutant removal efficiency, and greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,69, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goepel, K. D. (2017). Comparison of judgment scales of the analytical hierarchy process: A new approach. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Klaus_Goepel/publication/317672155_Comparison_of_Judgment_Scales_of_the_Analytical_Hierarchy_Process_-_A_New_Approach/links/59662412aca27227d792b610/Comparison-of-Judgment-Scales-of-the-Analytical-Hierarchy-Process-A-New-Approach.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2018.

  • Golden, B. L., Wasil, E. A., & Harker, P. T. (1989). The analytic hierarchy process. Berlin: Applications and Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbig, J., & Rudolph, K. U. (2018). Sustainable water financing and lean cost approaches as essentials for integrated water resources management and water governance: Lessons learnt from the Southern African context. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, ws2018099.

  • Hooper, V., & Lankford, B. (2018). Unintended water allocation. The Oxford Handbook of Water Politics and Policy, 248.

  • Huber, S. (2018). Energy consumption of wastewater treatment plants. http://www.huber.de/solutions/energy-efficiency/general/wastewater-treatment-plants.html. Accessed 24 June 2018.

  • Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert systems with applications, 38(11), 14336–14345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg, D., & Kaplan, T. (2010). Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP. Journal of the Operational Research Society,62, 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, M. (2018). Alternative water governance mechanisms in China: Examination of current practices. In Towards tradable water rights (pp. 69–108). Cham: Springer

  • Jing, M., Jie, Y., Shou-yi, L., & Lu, W. (2018). Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the risk assessment of dangerous small-sized reservoirs. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics,9(1), 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, Q. H., Van Nguyen, T. H., Do, M. D., Le, T. C. H., Nguyen, H. K., & Luu, T. B. (2018). TXT-tool 1.084–3.1: Landslide susceptibility mapping at a regional scale in Vietnam. In Landslide dynamics: ISDR-ICL landslide interactive teaching tools (pp. 161–174). Springer, Cham.

  • Liu, H., Hu, M., & Zhang, X. (2018). Energy costs hosting model: The most suitable business model in the developing stage of energy performance contracting. Journal of Cleaner Production,172, 2553–2566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, S., d’Antoni, B. M., Bongards, M., Chaparro, A., Cronrath, A., Fatone, F., et al. (2016). Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement. Applied Energy,179, 1251–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. L., & Nagel, R. (2018). In search of infrastructure optimization: A formalized, data-centric approach to long-term capital planning and asset management. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation,2018(1), 982–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengelkamp, E., Gärttner, J., Rock, K., Kessler, S., Orsini, L., & Weinhardt, C. (2018). Designing microgrid energy markets: A case study: The Brooklyn Microgrid. Applied Energy,210, 870–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, C. L., & Rheingans, R. D. (2006). Global challenges in water, sanitation and health. Journal of Water and Health,4(S1), 41–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, J., Mishra, S., & Saikia, L. C. (2009). Maiden application of bacterial foraging-based optimization technique in multiarea automatic generation control. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,24(2), 602–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz, S., & Ali, Y. (2018). Factors affecting the performance of water treatment plants in Pakistan. Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 3(3), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomero-González, J. A., & Hernández-Sancho, F. (2018). Improving drinking water treatment without tariff impact: The Spanish case study. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply,18(4), 1357–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panwar, A., Sharma, G., Nasiruddin, I., & Bansal, R. C. (2018). Frequency stabilization of hydro–hydro power system using hybrid bacteria foraging PSO with UPFC and HAE. Electric Power Systems Research,161, 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passino, K. M. (2002). Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 22(3), 52–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racoviceanu, A. I., Karney, B. W., Kennedy, C. A., & Colombo, A. F. (2007). Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions inventory for water treatment systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems,13(4), 261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Roda, I. R., Sànchez-Marrè, M., Comas, J., Baeza, J., Colprim, J., Lafuente, J., et al. (2002). A hybrid supervisory system to support WWTP operation: Implementation and validation. Water Science and Technology,45(4–5), 289–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K., Mandal, K. K., Mandal, A. C., & Patra, S. N. (2018). Analysis of energy management in micro grid—A hybrid BFOA and ANN approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,82, 4296–4308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rufuss, D. D. W., Kumar, V. R., Suganthi, L., Iniyan, S., & Davies, P. A. (2018). Techno-economic analysis of solar stills using integrated fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis. Solar Energy,159, 820–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., & Kansal, A. (2018). Energy and GHG accounting for wastewater infrastructure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,128, 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares, R. B., Memelli, M. S., Roque, R. P., & Gonçalves, R. F. (2017). Comparative analysis of the energy consumption of different wastewater treatment plants. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications,3(6), 79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellman, F. R. (2013). Handbook of water and wastewater treatment plant operations. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stewardson, M. J., & Guarino, F. (2018). Basin-scale environmental water delivery in the Murray-Darling, Australia: A hydrological perspective. Freshwater Biology,63, 969–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, X., & Chengwen, W. (2012). Energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants in China. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tao_Xie11/publication/266146909_Energy_Consumption_in_Wastewater_Treatment_plants_in_China/links/5428ce520cf238c6ea7cde91.pdf.

  • Taseli, B. K. (2018). Point source pollution and climate change impact from sequential batch reactor wastewater treatment plant. Global NEST Journal,20(1), 33–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. K. (2013). Survey of bacterial foraging optimization algorithm Riya.

  • Trapote, A., Albaladejo, A., & Simón, P. (2014). Energy consumption in an urban wastewater treatment plant: The case of Murcia Region (Spain). Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems,31(4), 304–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkata, S. G., Ganesh, V., & Madichetty, S. (2018). Application of bacteria foraging algorithm for modular multilevel converter-based microgrid with effect of wind power. Electrical Engineering,100, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, G., & Brattebø, H. (2011). Energy consumption, costs and environmental impacts for urban water cycle services: Case study of Oslo (Norway). Energy,36(2), 792–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkitapathi, P. R. S., Annamalai, V. K., Singh, J., & Kumar, N. (2018). U.S. Patent Application No. 15/443,098.

  • Wakeel, M., Chen, B., Hayat, T., Alsaedi, A., & Ahmad, B. (2016). Energy consumption for water use cycles in different countries: A review. Applied Energy,178, 868–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Yang, Y., Keller, A. A., Li, X., Feng, S., Dong, Y. N., et al. (2016). Comparative analysis of energy intensity and carbon emissions in wastewater treatment in USA, Germany, China and South Africa. Applied Energy,184, 873–881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G. (2013). Application of adaptive PID controller based on bacterial foraging optimization algorithm. In 25th Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC) (pp. 2353–2356).

  • Yang, X. (2010). Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms (2nd ed.). Frome: Luniver Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamani, M. K. M., Musirin, I., Hassan, H., Shaaya, S. A., Sulaiman, S. I., Ghani, N. A. M., et al. (2018). Active and reactive power scheduling optimization using firefly algorithm to improve voltage stability under load demand variation. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,9(2), 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarghami, E., Azemati, H., Fatourehchi, D., & Karamloo, M. (2018). Customizing well-known sustainability assessment tools for Iranian residential buildings using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Building and Environment,128, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Hydro-informatics Engineering(under Civil Engg Dept.), National Institute of Technology, Agartala, India

    Paulami De & Mrinmoy Majumder

Authors
  1. Paulami De
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mrinmoy Majumder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mrinmoy Majumder.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Description of selected parameters
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De, P., Majumder, M. Allocation of energy in surface water treatment plants for maximum energy conservation. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 3347–3370 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00349-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation