Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental efficiency of small-scale tea processors in Kenya: an inverse data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vision 2030, Kenya’s development blueprint for the period 2008–2030, envisions transforming the country into middle-income status where citizens enjoy a high quality of life. The blueprint has three pillars: economic, political and social. The thread that binds the three pillars is the natural environment, which supplies both renewable and non-renewable resources. Unfortunately, development in the other sectors may easily compromise the conditions of the natural environment and put the supply of clean water, food and fiber in jeopardy. For example, processing of agricultural products may increase gains from agriculture and lead to rapid expansion of the sector. If this is not carefully done, it may be characterized by wastage of resources, cutting down of forests to provide fuel and more land for cultivation, disposal of raw wastes into water bodies and over-exploitation of the soils. Using the example of small-scale tea processors in the country, this study sought to understand the environmental efficiency of the small-scale agro-processors. Small-scale tea processors were chosen because they have been implementing environmental efficiency-enhancing techniques in their production, yet no study had endeavored to test whether their initiatives were yielding positive results. The study adopted the innovative inverse data envelopment analysis approach on panel data to generate environmental efficiency scores, in the first step. In the second step, it analyzed the predictors of environmental efficiency using Tobit regression. Overall, the results showed that small-scale tea processors in Kenya were still environmentally inefficient, recording a mean efficiency index of only 49%, despite previous initiatives to improve efficiency. Thus, the processors could reduce 51% of the environmentally detrimental inputs without compromising output. Environmental inefficiency could be attributed to pursuit for higher profits and higher cost of investible funds. This shows that investment in environmental conservation is expensive and eats into the profits of the processors. Therefore, the small-scale processors may lack the incentives, in the short term, to invest in environment-friendly technologies. This may be compounded by the high cost of finance to be invested in such initiatives. Policy implication is that government should intervene in terms of tax concessions for firms that invest in environmental conservation, subsidies on technologies that guarantee environmental efficiency and access to cheaper funds for purchase and maintenance of environment-friendly technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azapagic, A., Bore, J., Cheserek, B., Kamunya, S., & Elbehri, A. (2015). Global warming potential of production and consumption of Kenya tea. Journal of Cleaner Production,112(5), 4031–4040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basnayake, K., & Gunaratne, P. (2002). Estimation of technical efficiency and its determinants in the tea small holding sector in the mid country wet zone of Sri Lanka. Srilankan Journal of Agricultural Economics,4(1), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. T. (2013). Environmental efficiency of ports: A data envelopment analysis approach. Maritime Policy & Management,40(5), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.797119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. T., Zhang, N., Danao, D., & Zhang, N. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy,58(2013), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Song, M., & Xu, L. (2015). Evaluation of environmental efficiency in China using data envelopment analysis. Ecological Indicators,52, 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W. (1999). Operational research/management science—Where it’s been—Where it should be going. Journal of the Operational Research Society,50, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis, a comprehensive test with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunk, A. S. (2002). Product quality, environmental accounting and quality performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,15(5), 719–732. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210448975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 173–178.

  • Hong, N. B., & Yabe, M. (2015a). Resource use efficiency of tea production in Vietnam: Using translog SFA model. Journal of Agricultural Science,7(9), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n9p160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, N. B., & Yabe, M. (2015b). Technical efficiency analysis of tea production in the northern mountainous region of Vietnam. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research,15(1), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., & Kao, J. (2012). Method for assessing corporate environmental performance. Inefficiency countervailed DEA (IC-DEA). The Journal of the Operational Research Society,63(4), 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Wong, Y., & Yang, M. (2014). Proactive environmental management and performance. Management Research Review,37(3), 210–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2012-0196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamande, M. (2010). Technical and environmental efficiency of Kenya’s manufacturing sector: A stochastic frontier analysis. In The thirteen annual conference on Global Economic Analysis, United Nations Conference Centre, Bangkok, Thailand 2010, p. 33.

  • KNBS. (2015). Economic survey. Nairobi: Government of Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, X., Zhao, X., & Cheng, F. (2015). The comparison analysis of total factor productivity and eco-efficiency in China’s cement manufactures. Energy Policy,81, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maity, S. (2017). Agris on-line papers in economics and informatics reform raises efficiency of tea estates in India. Agris On-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics,IX(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2017.090209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owuor, P. O., Kavoi, M. M., Wachira, F. N., & Ogola, S. O. (2007). Sustainability of smallholder tea growing in Kenya. International Journal of Tea Science,6(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. K., & Thijssen, G. J. (2000). Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research,121(2), 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayi, J. B. (2014). Determinants of energy efficiency in black tea processing factories: A case of Kenya Tea Development Agency. Unpublished Thesis, University of Nairobi.

  • Severo, E. A., de Guimarães, J. C. F., & Dorion, E. C. H. (2017). Cleaner production and environmental management as sustainable product innovation antecedents: A survey in Brazilian industries. Journal of Cleaner Production,142, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Wu, J. (2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,16(7), 4465–4469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., Wang, S., & Liu, W. (2014). A two-stage DEA approach for environmental efficiency measurement. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,186(5), 3041–3051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3599-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taulo, J. L., & Sebitosi, A. B. (2016). Material and energy flow analysis of the Malawian tea industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,56, 1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tea Board of Kenya. (2010). Opening emerging markets for Kenyan Tea, Nairobi.

  • Tian, D., Zhao, F., Mu, W., Kanianska, R., & Feng, J. (2016). Environmental efficiency of Chinese open-field grape production: An evaluation using data envelopment analysis and spatial autocorrelation. Sustainability (Switzerland),8(12), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wal, S. (2008). Sustainability issues in the tea sector—A comparative analysis of six leading production countries (pp. 1–110). Amsterdam: SOMO Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, E., Allwood, J., & Gutowski, T. (2016). The role of material efficiency in environmental stewardship. Annual Review of Environment and Resources,41(1), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F., Fang, H., Wu, J., & Ward, D. (2016). Environmental efficiency analysis of listed cement enterprises in China. Sustainability (Switzerland),8(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Embu, P.O. Box 6-60100, Embu, Kenya

    Karambu Kiende Gatimbu & Nancy L. M. Budambula

  2. Taita Taveta University, P.O. Box 635-80300, Voi, Kenya

    Maurice Juma Ogada

Authors
  1. Karambu Kiende Gatimbu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maurice Juma Ogada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nancy L. M. Budambula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karambu Kiende Gatimbu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gatimbu, K.K., Ogada, M.J. & Budambula, N.L.M. Environmental efficiency of small-scale tea processors in Kenya: an inverse data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 3333–3345 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00348-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00348-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation