Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of using low-quality irrigation water in vegetable production in Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine perceptions of the farmers and key informants on the use of low-quality irrigation water for vegetable production in urban and peri-urban areas in Morogoro, Tanzania. The methods used to collect data were farmer surveys (n = 60), focus group discussions (n = 4) and key informants interviews (n = 15). The results showed that the respondents had a positive perception on using low-quality irrigation water for vegetable production. The reported benefits include availability of water throughout the year, highest soil and crop nutrients in irrigation water, less costs of buying commercial fertilizers, vegetable production all year round, sustainable income generation from selling vegetables and also jobs creation in the community among farmers and vegetable sellers. Findings from Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test score on farmers perception scales indicate an association between the source of low-quality water used and the respondents’ sex. Accordingly, female farmers had higher positive perception on the benefits of low-quality water compared to male farmers. Higher perception score was also observed among farmers who used polluted river water in irrigation vegetable production compared to farmers who used wastewater. Since low-quality irrigation water is a good strategy of coping with scarcity of freshwater for communities which have no alternative source of irrigation water, the study recommends multi-sectorial agencies across the country to be involved in formulating policies and creating health promotion awareness for safe use of low-quality water for benefit maximization and health risk reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Tiba is the name of the former director of Mzumbe University who assisted in constructing Mzumbe wastewater stabilization ponds; wastewater from these ponds is mostly known by residents as river Tiba.

References

  • Adewumi, J., llemobade, A., & van Zyl, J. (2014). Factors predicting the intention to accept treated wastewater reuse for non-potable uses amongst domestic and non-domestic respondents. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 56(1), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akponikpè, P. B. I., Wima, K., Yacouba, H., & Mermoud, A. (2011). Reuse of domestic wastewater treated in macrophyte ponds to irrigate tomato and eggplant in semi-arid West-Africa: Benefits and risks. Agricultural Water Management, 98(5), 834–840. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, B., Msoffe, P. L. M., Kajuna, F. F., Bunn, D., Muhairwa, A. P., & Cardona, C. J. (2012). Causes of losses in free range local chickens following control of Newcastle disease in three villages in Morogoro, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 24(7), Article #124.

  • Arndt, C., Farmer, W., Strzepek, K., & Thurlow, J. (2012). Climate change, agriculture and food security in Tanzania. Review of Development Economics, 16(3), 378–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker-Reid, F., Harper, G. A., & Hamilton, A. J. (2010). Affluent effluent: Growing vegetables with wastewater in Melbourne, Australia—A wealthy but bone-dry city. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 24(1–2), 79–94. doi:10.1007/s10795-009-9082-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, G., Potter, R. B., & Nortcliff, S. (2011). Water reuse for irrigation in Jordan: Perceptions of water quality among farmers. Agricultural Water Management, 98(5), 847–854. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalkoo, S., Sahay, S., Inam, A., & Iqbal, S. (2014). Application of wastewater irrigation on growth and yield of chilli under nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37(7), 1139–1147. doi:10.1080/01904167.2014.881864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ensink, J. H. J., Mahmood, T., & Dalsgaard, A. (2007). Wastewater-irrigated vegetables: Market handling versus irrigation water quality. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 12(Suppl. 2), 2–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01935.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faruqui, N. I., Scott, C. A., & Raschid-Sally, L. (2004). Confronting the realities of wastewater use in irrigated agriculture: Lessons learned and recommendations. 16. Colombo, Sri Lanka: CAB International.

  • Graefe, S., Schlecht, E., & Buerkert, A. (2008). Opportunities and challenges of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Niamey, Niger. Outlook on Agriculture, 37(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbo, J. R., Malaka, E. M., Odiyo, J. O., & Nare, L. (2010). The health implications of wastewater reuse in vegetable irrigation: a case study from Malamulele, South Africa. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 20(3), 201–211. doi:10.1080/09603120903511093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gweyi-Onyango, J., & Osei-Kwarteng, M. (2011). Safe vegetable production with wastewater in developing countries: Demystifying the negative notions. African Journal of Horticultural Science, 5, 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalogeras, N., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Pennings, J. M. E., Gunnlaugsdóttir, H., Holm, F., Leino, O., et al. (2012). State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Economics and marketing-finance. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50(1), 56–66. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.066.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karanja, N., Njenga, M., Prain, G., Kang’ethe, E., Kironchi, G., Githuku, C., et al. (2010). Assessment of environmental and public health hazards in wastewater used for urban agriculture in Nairobi, Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 12(1), 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keraita, B. (2008). Extent and implications of agricultural reuse of untreated, partly treated and diluted wastewater in developing countries. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources,. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20083058.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keraita, B., Drechsel, P., & Konradsen, F. (2008a). Perceptions of farmers on health risks and risk reduction measures in wastewater-irrigated urban vegetable farming in Ghana. Journal of Risk Research, 11(8), 1047–1061. doi:10.1080/13669870802380825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keraita, B., Drechsel, P., & Konradsen, F. (2008b). Perceptions of farmers on health risks and risk reduction measures in wastewater-irrigated urban vegetable farming in Ghana. Journal of Risk Research, 11(8), 1047–1061. doi:10.1080/13669870802380825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilobe, B. M., Mdegela, R., & Mtambo, M. M. (2013). Acceptability of wastewater resource and its impact on crop production in Tanzania: The case of Dodoma, Morogoro and Mvomero wastewater stabilization ponds. Kivukoni Journal, 1(2), 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, L. G., Phuc, P. D., Hiep, N. T., Samuelsen, H., Jensen, P. K., Dalsgaard, A., et al. (2008). The fear of awful smell: Risk perceptions among farmers in Vietnam using wastewater and human excreta in agriculture. Southern Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 39(2), 341–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerkvist, Carl Johan, Hess, Sebastian, Okello, Julius, Hansson, Helena, & Karanja, Nancy. (2013). Food health risk perceptions among consumers, farmers, and traders of leafy vegetables in Nairobi. Food Policy, 38, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levasseur, V., Kouamé, C., Pasquini, M., & Temple, L. (2007). A review of urban and peri-urban vegetable production in West Africa. In 27th International Horticultural Congress: International Symposium on Horticultural Plants in Urban and Peri-Urban Life; Seoul; South Korea; 13 August 2006 through 19 August 2006 (pp. 245–252). Bamako, Mali.

  • Mann, C. J. (2012). Observational research methods—Cohort studies, cross sectional studies, and case–control studies. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2(1), 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2011.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizyed, N. R. (2013). Challenges to treated wastewater reuse in arid and semi-arid areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 25, 186–195. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, M., Ladhari, R., Reynoso, J., Toro, R., & Sepulveda, C. (2012). An independent assessment of the unidimensionality, reliability, validity and factor structure of the LibQUAL+™ scale. The Service Industries Journal, 32(16), 2585–2605. doi:10.1080/02642069.2011.593167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagara, G., Lam, W.-H., Lee, N. C. H., Othman, F., & Shaaban, M. G. (2014). Comparative SWOT analysis for water solutions in Asia and Africa. Water Resources Management, 29, 125–138. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0831-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndunda, E. N., & Mungatana, E. D. (2013). Farmers’ perception and knowledge of health risks in wastewater irrigation. Creative Commons Attribution, Online (open-access), e70081917. doi:10.7392/Research.70081917.

  • Nimoh, F., Ohene-Yankyera, K., Poku, K., Konradsen, F., & Robert, C. A. (2014). Farmers’ perception on excreta reuse for peri-urban agriculture in southern Ghana. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6(10), 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, J. (2008). Livelihoods, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in Morogoro, Tanzania. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(7), 642–654. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2008.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pangapanga, C., Marijani, B., Tumbo, S., Mapulila, T., & Rwehumbiza, F. (2005). Using the PT model to determine appropriate water management for maize production: A case study of Fulwe village in Morogoro District.

  • Qadir, M., Wichelns, D., & Raschid-Sally, L. (2007). Agricultural use of marginal-quality water: opportunities and challenges (pp. 425–457).

  • Qadir, M., Wichelns, D., Raschid-Sally, L., McCornick, P., Drechsel, P., Bahri, A., & Minhas, P. (2010). The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. Agricultural Water Management, 97(4), 561–568. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, K., Rauch, W., & Gold, A. (2011). Bipolar items for the measurement of personal optimism instead of unipolar items. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(4), 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shayo, N. B., Chove, B. E., Gidamis, A., & Ngoma, O. (2007). The quality of water in small community supplies of Kingolwira village, Morogoro, Tanzania. Tanzania Health Research Bulletin, 9(1), 56–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slegers, M. F. W. (2008). “If only it would rain”: Farmers’ perceptions of rainfall and drought in semi-arid central Tanzania. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(11), 2106–2123. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, G., Fangueiro, D., Duarte, E., & Vasconcelos, E. (2011). Reuse of treated wastewater and sewage sludge for fertilization and irrigation. Water Science and Technology, 64, 871–879. doi:10.2166/wst.2011.658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction, sage university papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, No 07-082. Newburry Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzania National Bureau of Statistics. (2013). United Republic of Tanzania 2012 Population and Housing Census.

  • The Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. (1992). Water quality for agriculture, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29. Rome, Italy.

  • Tijhuis, M. J., de Jong, N., Pohjola, M. V., Gunnlaugsdóttir, H., Hendriksen, M., Hoekstra, J., et al. (2012). State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Food and nutrition. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50(1), 5–25. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ueland, Ø., Gunnlaugsdottir, H., Holm, F., Kalogeras, N., Leino, O., Luteijn, J. M., et al. (2012). State of the art in benefit-risk analysis: Consumer perception. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50(1), 67–76. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UN-HABITAT. (2009). Tanzania: Morogoro profile. Nairobi, Kenya.

  • Wester, J., Timpano, K. R., Çek, D., Lieberman, D., Fieldstone, S. C., & Broad, K. (2015). Psychological and social factors associated with wastewater reuse emotional discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology,. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is part of a Ph.D., funded by Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs through Safe Water for Food (SaWaFo) project. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Departments of Veterinary Medicine and Public Health and Agricultural Education and Extension of Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania and Department of Public Health, Global Health section of University of Copenhagen, Denmark for their technical and administrative support during the entire period of this study. Also, authors acknowledge study participants of Mzumbe–Changarawe area and Fungafunga–Kichangani area for their willingness to participate in this study. Further, the authors also acknowledge four anonymous reviewers and editors for constructive comments which have improved very much the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winfrida Mayilla.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 Items used in the questionnaire to assess perception of using low-quality irrigation water for vegetable production

Appendix 2

See Table 5.

Table 5 Items used in the questionnaire to assess perception on the benefits of low-quality irrigation water for vegetable production

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayilla, W., Keraita, B., Ngowi, H. et al. Perceptions of using low-quality irrigation water in vegetable production in Morogoro, Tanzania. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 165–183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9730-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9730-2

Keywords

Navigation