Skip to main content
Log in

Sediment Diagenesis Module for CE-QUAL-W2 Part 2: Numerical Formulation

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pit lakes are used worldwide as part of closure schemes for mining operations. Pit lakes have also been proposed in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Canada where bitumen is close enough to the surface to be recovered using conventional surface mining and chemical extraction procedures. Many of the pit lakes are designed to cap tailings with a substantial water layer. The pore water in tailings will contain various amounts of labile and refractory organic compounds, nutrients, trace metals, and ion concentrations that, ultimately, will be released to the water cap as the tailings consolidate. In addition to advective release of constituents from the tailings pore water, chemical reactions, more specifically, diagenetic processes, within the tailings will result in changes to the redox state, speciation, and phase of several chemicals. A module that quantifies diagenetic processes has been developed for the 2-dimensional hydrodynamic and water quality model, CE-QUAL-W2. The module includes processes such as biogenic gas production (build up and release of methane, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia); physical release of bubbles through the water column; unconsolidated sediment re-suspension during bubble ebullition; and dynamic oxygen consumption at the sediment–water interface and in the water column from bubbles. This paper presents the numerical framework used to develop the diagenesis module and the chemical basis for the algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Algar, C. K., & Boudreau, B. P. (2009). Transient growth of an isolated bubble in muddy, fine-grained sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 73(9), 2581–2591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boudreau, B. P. (1997). Diagenetic models and their implementation. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 414 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Boudreau, B. P., Algar, C., Johnson, B. D., Croudace, I., Reed, A., Furukawa, Y., Dorgan, K. M., Jumars, P. A., Grader, A. S., & Gardiner, B. S. (2005). Bubble growth and rise in soft sediments. Geology, 33(6), 517–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boudreau, B. P., Gardiner, B. S., & Johnson, B. D. (2001). Rate of growth of isolated bubbles in sediments with a diagenetic source of methane. Limnology and Oceanography, 46(3), 616–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boudreau, B. P., Gardiner, B. S., & Johnson, B. D. (2001). Errata to rate of growth of isolated bubbles in sediments with a diagenetic source of methane. Limnology and Oceanography, 46(6), 1578.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchak, E. M., & Edinger, J.E. (1984). Generalized, longitudinal-vertical hydrodynamics and transport: development, programming and applications. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Contract No. DACW39-84-M-1636. Prepared by J. E. Edinger Associates, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087–3226. Document No. 84-18-R. June.

  7. Cole, T. M., & Buchak, E. M. (1995). CE-QUAL-W2: a two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, Version 2.0 (Instruction Report EL-95-1). Vicksburg: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cole, T.M., & Wells, S.A. (2008). CE-QUAL-W2: a two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, version 3.6. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC 20314-1000.

  9. DiToro, D. M. (2001). Sediment flux modeling. New York: Wiley-Interscience. 656pp.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fedorak, P. M., Coy, D. L., Salloum, M. J., & Dudas, M. J. (2002). Methanogenic potential of tailings samples from oil sands extraction plants. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 48, 21–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Foght, J. M., Fedorak, P. M., & Westlake, D. W. S. (1985). Microbial content and metabolic activities in Syncrude tailings pond. AOSTRA Journal of Research, 1, 139–146.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardiner, B. S., Boudreau, B. P., & Johnson, B. D. (2003). Growth of disk-shaped bubbles in sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67, 1485–1494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haveroen, M. E., MacKinnon, M. D., & Fedorak, P. M. (2005). Polyacrylamide added as a nitrogen source stimulates methanogenesis in consortia from various wastewaters. Water Research, 39(14), 3333–3341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holowenko, F.M. (2000). Methanogenesis and fine tailings waste from oil sands extraction: a microcosm-based laboratory examination. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Alberta. Edmonton, Ab. 203pp.

  15. Holowenko, F. M., MacKinnon, M. D., & Fedorak, P. M. (2000). Methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria in oil sands fine tailings waste. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 46(10), 927–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Holowenko, F. M., MacKinnon, M. D., & Fedorak, P. M. (2001). Naphthenic acids and surrogate naphthenic acids in methanogenic microcosms. Water Research, 35, 2595–2606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hosokawa, S., & Tomiyama, A. (2010). Effects of bubbles on turbulent flows in vertical channels. Tampa: 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow. ICMF 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, B. D., Boudreau, B. P., Gardiner, B. S., & Maass, R. (2002). Mechanical response of sediments to bubble growth. Marine Geology, 187, 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein, S. (2006). Sediment porewater exchange and solute release during ebullition. Maritime Chemistry, 102, 60–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martens, C. S., & Klump, J. V. (1980). Biogeochemical cycling in an organic-rich coastal marine basin-I. Methane sediment-water exchange processes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 44, 471–490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mikula, R.J., Kasperski, K.L., Burns, R.D., & MacKinnon, M.D. (1996). Nature and fate of oil sands fine tailings. In: Schramm, L.L., Suspensions: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. American Chemical Society.

  22. Siddique, T., Fedorak, P. M., MacKinnon, M. D., & Foght, J. M. (2007). Metabolism of BTEX and naphtha compounds to methane in oil sands tailings. Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 2350–2356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Siddique, T., Fedorak, P. M., & Foght, J. M. (2006). Biodegradation of short-chain n-alkanes in oil sands tailing under methanogenic conditions. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 5459–5464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siddique, T., Gupta, R., Fedorak, P. M., MacKinnon, M. D., & Foght, J. M. (2008). A first approximation model to predict methane generation from an oil sands tailings settling Basin. Chemosphere, 72, 1573–1580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Siddique, T., Penner, T., Semple, K., & Foght, J. M. (2011). Anaerobic biodegradation of longer-chain n-alkanes coupled to methane production in oil sands tailings. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 5892–5899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sobolewski, A. (1992). The microbial characteristics of oil sands tailings sludge. Calgary: Consultant’s report submitted to AOSTRA.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Suthaker, N.N. (1995). Geotechnics of oil sand fine tailings. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

  28. van Kesteren, W., & van Kessel, T. (2002). Gas bubble nucleation and growth in cohesive sediments. In J. C. Winterwerp & K. Kranenburg (Eds.), Fine sediment dynamics in the marine environment. Proc Marine Science 5 (pp. 329–341). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. van Kesteren, W., & van Kessel, T. (2002). Gas production and transport in artificial sludge depots. Waste Management, 22, 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vandenberg, J. A., Prakash, S., & Buchak, E. (2014). Sediment diagenesis module for CE-QUAL-W2. Part 1: conceptual formulation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment. doi:10.1007/s10666-014-9428-0.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wheeler, S. J. (1988). A conceptual model for soils containing large gas bubbles. Geotechnical, 38, 389–397.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yuan, Q. Z., Valsaraj, K. T., Reible, D. D., & Willson, C. S. (2007). A laboratory study of sediment and contaminant release during gas ebullition. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 57, 1103–1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yuan, Q. Z., Valsaraj, K. T., & Reible, D. D. (2009). A model for contaminant and sediment transport via gas ebullition through a sediment cap. Environmental Engineering Science, 26(9), 1381–1931.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zheng, L. & Yapa, P.D. (2000). Buoyant velocity of spherical and non-spherical bubbles/ droplets. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 852–855.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This model development was funded by the Cumulative Environmental Management Association (CEMA), which is a multi-stakeholder group that is tasked with studying cumulative effects in Alberta’s oil sand region and making recommendations for regulatory agencies. The authors wish to thank CEMA and its members for funding this study. In addition, the authors wish to thank CEMA’s End Pit Lake Task Group and the three external reviewers for providing insightful reviews of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry A. Vandenberg.

Additional information

This is a two-part paper, along with Sediment Diagenesis Module for CE-QUAL-W2. Part 1: Conceptual Formulation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prakash, S., Vandenberg, J.A. & Buchak, E.M. Sediment Diagenesis Module for CE-QUAL-W2 Part 2: Numerical Formulation. Environ Model Assess 20, 249–258 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9459-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9459-1

Keywords

Navigation