Abstract
Nitrate pollution from agriculture is an important environmental externality, caused by the excessive use of fertilizers. The internalization of this problem, via a tax on mineral nitrogen, could lead to a second best solution, reducing nitrate emissions. Several authors suggest that a reduction in agricultural support could produce similar results. In this paper, we examine the effects of different levels of a uniformly implemented nitrogen tax in France under two policy scenarios, corresponding to post Agenda 2000 and 2003 Luxembourg reforms of European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy, in order to reveal the synergies and conflicts between the tax and the policy scenarios in terms of nitrate emissions abatement. The analysis is performed at different geographical scales, from the national to the regional and is based on a bioeconomic approach that involves the coupling of the economic model AROPAj with the crop model STICS. Results show that the efficiency of the N-tax varies according to the geographical scale of the analysis and the type of farming. Furthermore, we prove that a uniform implementation may lead to perverse effects that should always be taken into account when introducing second-best instruments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this study, the V2 version of the model is used, which concerns the version developed for the GENEDEC program and is associated with FADN data for 2002 and EU-15.
For more information: http://www.marsop.info/marsop3/.
For more information: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/digital-elevation-model-of-europe.
For more information: http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
For more information: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-landcover.
For rain-fed crops, two irrigation options were considered (full irrigation and rain), while for crops with high water requirements only full irrigation was opted. Hence, 60 curves were created for the former and 30 for the latter.
For the rest of the paper, we will use the terms “nitrate emissions” and “nitrogen losses in the form of nitrates”, or simply “NO3–N losses” interchangeably.
References
Hanley, N. (1990). The economics of nitrate pollution. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 17, 129–151.
Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1971). The use of standards and prices for protection of the environment. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 73(1), 42–54.
Abrams, L. W., & Barr, J. L. (1974). Corrective taxes for pollution control. An application of the environmental pricing ond standards systems to agriculture. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1, 296–318.
Tietenberg, T. H. (1973). Controlling pollution by price and standard systems: a general equilibrium analysis. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 75(2), 193–203.
Griffin, R. C., & Bromley, D. W. (1982). Agricultural runoff as a nonpoint externality: a theoretical development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 547–552.
Shortle, J. S., & Dunn, J. W. (1986). The relative efficiency of agricultural source water pollution control policies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 668–677.
Segerson, K. (1988). Uncertainty and incentives for nonpoint pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(1), 87–98.
Xepapadeas, A. P. (1991). Environmental policy under imperfect information: Incentives and moral hazard. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20(2), 113–126.
Cabe, R., & Herriges, J. A. (1992). The regulation of non-point-source pollution under imperfect and asymmetric information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(2), 134–146.
Shortle, J. S., Horan, R. D., & Abler, D. G. (1998). Research issues in nonpoint pollution control. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), 571–585.
Helfand, G. E., Berck, P., & Maull, T. (2003). The theory of pollution policy. In K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (Eds.), Environmental degradation and institutional responses (handbook of environmental economics, vol. 1) (pp. 249–303). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Claassen, R., & Horan, R. D. (2001). Uniform and non-uniform second-best input taxes. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 1–22.
Helfand, G. E., & House, B. W. (1995). Regulating nonpoint source pollution under heterogeneous conditions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(4), 1024–1032.
Martínez, Y., & Albiac, J. (2006). Nitrate pollution control under soil heterogeneity. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 521–532.
Gallego-Ayala, J., & Gómez-Limón, J. A. (2009). Analysis of policy instruments for control of nitrate pollution in irrigated agriculture in Castilla y León, Spain. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 27(1), 24–40.
Semaan, J., Flichman, G., Scardigno, A., & Steduto, P. (2007). Analysis of nitrate pollution control policies in the irrigated agriculture of Apulia Region (Southern Italy): a bio-economic modelling approach. Agricultural Systems, 94(2), 357–367.
Taylor, M. L., Adams, R. M., & Miller, S. F. (1992). Farm-level response to agricultural effluent control strategies: the case of the Willamette Valley. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 17(1), 173–185.
Wu, J., & Babcock, B. A. (2001). Spatial heterogeneity and the choice of instruments to control nonpoint pollution. Environmental and Resource Economics, 18, 173–192.
Cochard, F., Willinger, M., & Xepapadeas, A. (2005). Efficiency of nonpoint source pollution instruments: an experimental study. Environmental and Resource Economics, 30, 393–422.
Spraggon, J. (2002). Exogeneous targeting instruments as a solution to group moral hazards. Journal of Public Economics, 84, 427–456.
Abler, D. G., & Shortle, J. S. (1992). Environmental and farm commodity policy linkages in the US and the EC. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 19, 197–217.
De Haen, H. (1982). Economic aspects of policies to control nitrate contamination resulting from agricultural production. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 9, 443–465.
Wier, M., Andersen, J. M., Jensen, J. D., & Jensen, T. C. (2002). The EU’s Agenda 2000 reform for the agricultural sector: environmental and economic effects in Denmark. Ecological Economics, 41(2), 345–359.
Schmid, E., Sinabell, F., & Hofreither, M. F. (2007). Phasing out of environmentally harmful subsidies: consequences of the 2003 CAP reform. Ecological Economics, 60(3), 596–604.
Mosnier, C., Ridier, A., Kphaliacos, C., & Carpy-Goulard, F. (2009). Economic and environmental impact of the CAP mid-term review on arable crop farming in South-western France. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1408–1416.
Johnson, S. L., Adams, R. M., & Perry, G. M. (1991). The on-farm costs of reducing groundwater pollution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1063–1073.
>Rougoor, C. W., Van Zeijts, H., Hofreither, M. F., & Bäckman, S. (2001). Experiences with fertilizer taxes in Europe. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(6), 877–887.
Janssen, S., & Van Ittersum, M. K. (2007). Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: a review of bio-economic farm models. Agricultural Systems, 94(3), 622–636.
Larson, D. M., Helfand, G. E., & House, B. W. (1996). Second-best tax policies to reduce nonpoint source pollution. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(4), 1108–1117.
Galko, E., & Jayet, P. A. (2011). Economic and environmental effects of decoupled agricultural support in the EU. Agricultural Economics, 42, 605–618.
Chakir, R., Debove, E., De Cara, S., & Jayet, P. A. (2006). The AROPAj model. Work Package 2, Deliverable 2, GENEDEC Project. http://www.grignon.inra.fr/economiepublique/genedec/publi/deliv/WP2_D2_TR.doc. Accessed 9 August 2010.
De Cara, S., Houzé, M., & Jayet, P. A. (2005). Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture in the EU: a spatial assessment of sources and abatement costs. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 551–583.
De Cara, S., & Jayet, P. A. (2000). Emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture: the heterogeneity of abatement costs in France. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 27(3), 281–303.
Brisson, N., Gary, C., Roche, R., Mary, B., Ripoche, D., Zimmer, D., et al. (2003). An overview of the crop model STICS. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 309–332.
Godard, C., Roger-Estrade, J., Jayet, P. A., Brisson, N., & Le Bas, C. (2008). Use of available information at a European level to construct crop nitrogen response curves for the regions of the EU. Agricultural Systems, 97(1–2), 68–82.
Llewelyn, R. V., & Featherstone, A. M. (1997). A comparison of crop production functions using simulated data for irrigated corn in Western Kansas. Agricultural Systems, 54(4), 521–538.
Frank, M. D., Beattie, B. R., & Embletton, M. E. (1990). A comparison of alternative crop response models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3), 597–603.
Schott, C., Mignolet, C., & Benoît, M. (2009). Agriculture du bassin de la Seine. Programme PIREN-SEINE No.5, Agence de l' eau Seine-Normandie. http://www.sisyphe.upmc.fr/piren/fascicules. Accessed 28 July 2010.
Viennot, P., Ledoux, E., Monget, J. M., Schott, C., Gernier, C., & Beaudoin, N. (2009). La pollution du bassin de la Seine par les nitrates. Programme PIREN-SEINE No.3, Agence de l' eau Seine-Normandie. http://www.sisyphe.upmc.fr/piren/fascicules. Accessed 28 July 2010.
Berntsen, J., Petersen, B. M., Jacobsen, B. H., Olesen, J. E., & Hutchings, N. J. (2003). Evaluating nitrogen taxation scenarios using the dynamic whole farm simulation model FASSET. Agricultural Systems, 76(3), 817–839.
Schou, J. S., Skop, E., & Jensen, J. D. (2000). Integrated agri-environmental modelling: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two nitrogen tax instruments in the Vejle Fjord watershed, Denmark. Journal of Environmental Management, 58(3), 199–212.
Goetz, R. U., Schmid, H., & Lehmann, B. (2006). Determining the economic gains from regulation at the extensive and intensive margins. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(1), 1–30.
Horner, G. L. (1975). Internalizing agricultural nitrogen pollution externalities: a case study. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(1), 33–39.
Acknowledgments
This paper is based on research activities funded by the PIREN-Seine, an interdisciplinary research program dedicated to the study of the environment in the Seine river basin in France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jayet, PA., Petsakos, A. Evaluating the Efficiency of a Uniform N-Input Tax under Different Policy Scenarios at Different Scales. Environ Model Assess 18, 57–72 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-012-9331-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-012-9331-5