Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agriculture in the EU: A Spatial Assessment of Sources and Abatement Costs

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agriculture significantly contributes to emissions of greenhouse gases in the EU. By using a farm-type, supply-side oriented, linear-programming model of the European agriculture, the baseline levels of methane and nitrous oxide emissions are assessed at the regional level in the EU-15. For a range of CO2-equivalent prices, we assess the potential abatement, as well as the resulting optimal mix of emission sources in the total abatement. Furthermore, we show that the spatial variability of the abatement achieved at a given carbon price is large, indicating that abatement cost heterogeneity is a fundamental feature in the design of a mitigation policy. The cost savings permitted by market-based instruments relative to uniform standard are shown to be large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J. M. Antle S. Capalbo S. Mooney E. Elliott K. Paustian (2003) ArticleTitleSpatial Heterogeneity, Contract Design, and the Efficiency of Carbon Sequestration Policies for Agriculture Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 IssueID2 231–250 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00038-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Arrouays J. Balesdent J.-C. Germon P.-A. Jayet J.-F. Soussana P. Stengel (2002) Increasing Carbon Stocks in French Agricultural Soils? Synthesis of an Assessment Report by the French Institute for Agricultural Research on Request of the French Ministry for Ecology and Sustainable Development INRA Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • M. H. Babiker P. Criqui A. D. Ellerman J. M. Reilly L. L. Viguier (2003) ArticleTitleAssessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union Environmental Modeling & Assessment 8 IssueID3 187–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J. (2001), ‘Economic evaluation of emission reductions of nitrous oxides and methane in agriculture in the EU’. Final Report AEAT-3773, AEA Technolgies and Environment, Abingdon, UK. Contribution to a Study for DG Environment, European Commission by Ecofys Energy and Environment, AEA Technology Environment and National Technical University of Athens, 99 pp.

  • S. Cara ParticleDe P.-A. Jayet (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation et Régulation de L’effet de Serre D’origine Agricole L’Actualité Economique 75 IssueID4 597–623

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Cara ParticleDe P.-A. Jayet (2000) ArticleTitleEmissions of Greenhouse Gases from Agriculture: The Heterogeneity of Abatement Costs in France European Review of Agricultural Economics 27 IssueID3 281–303

    Google Scholar 

  • European Climate Change Programme (2003), ‘Can We Meet Our Kyoto Targets?’. Second ECCP progress report, European Commission, DG ENV, Brussels, Belgium

  • European Commission (1998a), ‘Options to Reduce Methane Emissions’. Report AEAT-3773, DG XI, Brussels, Belgium, 255 pp

  • European Commission (1998b), ‘Options to Reduce Nitrous Oxide Emissions’. Report AEAT-4180, DG XI, Brussels, Belgium, 169 pp

  • European Commission (2002), ‘Towards an Analytical Capacity in Costing of Abatement Options for Forestry and Agricultural Carbon Sinks’. Final report, DG XI – EuroCare, Bonn, Germany, 51 pp

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameEuropean Environmental Agency (2004) ‘Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends and Projections in Europe 2003’ European Environmental Agency Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Feng J. Zhao C. L. Kling (2002) ArticleTitleThe Time Path and Implementation of Carbon Sequestration American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 IssueID1 134–149 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8276.00248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Freibauer (2003) ArticleTitleRegionalised Inventory of Biogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions from European Agriculture European Journal of Agronomy 19 IssueID2 135–160 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00020-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Hayhoe A. Jain H. Pitcher C. MacCracken M. Gibbs D. Wuebbles R. Harvey D. Kruger (1999) ArticleTitleCosts of Multigreenhouse Gas Reduction Targets for the USA Science 286 905–906 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.286.5441.905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000), ‘Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry’. Special Report, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001a) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 881 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001b) Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Jarrige (1988) Alimentation des Bovins, Ovins et Caprins INRA Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Lal J. P. Bruce (1999) ArticleTitleThe Potential of World Cropland Soils to Sequester C and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect Environmental Science and Policy 2 IssueID2 177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Manne R. G. Richels (2001) ArticleTitleAn Alternative Approach to Establishing Trade-Offs Among Greenhouse Gases Nature 410 675–677 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35070541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. A. McCarl U. A. Schneider (2001) ArticleTitleGreenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture and Forestry Science 294 2481–2482 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1064193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Newell R. N. Stavins (2003) ArticleTitleCost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings of Market-Based Policies Journal of Regulatory Economics 23 IssueID1 43–59 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021879330491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Perez W. Britz (2003) ArticleTitleReduction of Global Warming Emissions in the European Agriculture through a Tradable Permit System. An Analysis with the Regional Agricultural Model CAPRI Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V. Bd. 39 283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, I., W. Britz and C. Wieck (2003), ‘Modeling of Passive Environmental Indicators for the European Agriculture: The Role of Marginal Abatement Costs’. Contributed paper, 12th Annual Conference of the EARE, Bilbao, Spain

  • Perez, I., W. Britz and K. Holm-Müller (2004), ‘The Use of Tradable Permits in the European Agriculture as a Feasible and Cost-Effective Mitigation Strategy’, in GHG Emissions from Agriculture. Mitigation Options and Strategies (Conference Proceedings), pp. 335–336

  • J. M. Reilly R. G. Prinn J. Harnisch J. Fitzmaurice H. D. Jacoby D. Kicklighter J. Melillo P. Stone A. Sokolov C. Wang (1999) ArticleTitleMulti-Gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol Nature 401 549–555 Occurrence Handle10.1038/44069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. H. Schlesinger (2000) ArticleTitleCarbon Sequestration in Soils: Some Cautions Amidst Optimism Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 82 IssueID1–3 121–127

    Google Scholar 

  • U. A. Schneider B. A. McCarl (2003) ArticleTitleEconomic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation Environmental and Resource Economics 24 291–312 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023632309097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. L. Viguier M. H. Babiker J. M. Reilly (2003) ArticleTitleThe Costs of the Kyoto Protocol in the European Union Energy Policy 31 IssueID5 459–481 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00075-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane De Cara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Cara, S., Houzé, M. & Jayet, PA. Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agriculture in the EU: A Spatial Assessment of Sources and Abatement Costs. Environ Resource Econ 32, 551–583 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-0071-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-0071-8

Key words

JEL classifications

Navigation