Abstract
Agriculture significantly contributes to emissions of greenhouse gases in the EU. By using a farm-type, supply-side oriented, linear-programming model of the European agriculture, the baseline levels of methane and nitrous oxide emissions are assessed at the regional level in the EU-15. For a range of CO2-equivalent prices, we assess the potential abatement, as well as the resulting optimal mix of emission sources in the total abatement. Furthermore, we show that the spatial variability of the abatement achieved at a given carbon price is large, indicating that abatement cost heterogeneity is a fundamental feature in the design of a mitigation policy. The cost savings permitted by market-based instruments relative to uniform standard are shown to be large.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. M. Antle S. Capalbo S. Mooney E. Elliott K. Paustian (2003) ArticleTitleSpatial Heterogeneity, Contract Design, and the Efficiency of Carbon Sequestration Policies for Agriculture Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 IssueID2 231–250 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00038-4
D. Arrouays J. Balesdent J.-C. Germon P.-A. Jayet J.-F. Soussana P. Stengel (2002) Increasing Carbon Stocks in French Agricultural Soils? Synthesis of an Assessment Report by the French Institute for Agricultural Research on Request of the French Ministry for Ecology and Sustainable Development INRA Paris, France
M. H. Babiker P. Criqui A. D. Ellerman J. M. Reilly L. L. Viguier (2003) ArticleTitleAssessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union Environmental Modeling & Assessment 8 IssueID3 187–197
Bates, J. (2001), ‘Economic evaluation of emission reductions of nitrous oxides and methane in agriculture in the EU’. Final Report AEAT-3773, AEA Technolgies and Environment, Abingdon, UK. Contribution to a Study for DG Environment, European Commission by Ecofys Energy and Environment, AEA Technology Environment and National Technical University of Athens, 99 pp.
S. Cara ParticleDe P.-A. Jayet (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation et Régulation de L’effet de Serre D’origine Agricole L’Actualité Economique 75 IssueID4 597–623
S. Cara ParticleDe P.-A. Jayet (2000) ArticleTitleEmissions of Greenhouse Gases from Agriculture: The Heterogeneity of Abatement Costs in France European Review of Agricultural Economics 27 IssueID3 281–303
European Climate Change Programme (2003), ‘Can We Meet Our Kyoto Targets?’. Second ECCP progress report, European Commission, DG ENV, Brussels, Belgium
European Commission (1998a), ‘Options to Reduce Methane Emissions’. Report AEAT-3773, DG XI, Brussels, Belgium, 255 pp
European Commission (1998b), ‘Options to Reduce Nitrous Oxide Emissions’. Report AEAT-4180, DG XI, Brussels, Belgium, 169 pp
European Commission (2002), ‘Towards an Analytical Capacity in Costing of Abatement Options for Forestry and Agricultural Carbon Sinks’. Final report, DG XI – EuroCare, Bonn, Germany, 51 pp
InstitutionalAuthorNameEuropean Environmental Agency (2004) ‘Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends and Projections in Europe 2003’ European Environmental Agency Copenhagen, Denmark
H. Feng J. Zhao C. L. Kling (2002) ArticleTitleThe Time Path and Implementation of Carbon Sequestration American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 IssueID1 134–149 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8276.00248
A. Freibauer (2003) ArticleTitleRegionalised Inventory of Biogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions from European Agriculture European Journal of Agronomy 19 IssueID2 135–160 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00020-5
K. Hayhoe A. Jain H. Pitcher C. MacCracken M. Gibbs D. Wuebbles R. Harvey D. Kruger (1999) ArticleTitleCosts of Multigreenhouse Gas Reduction Targets for the USA Science 286 905–906 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.286.5441.905
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000), ‘Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry’. Special Report, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland
InstitutionalAuthorNameIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001a) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 881 pp
InstitutionalAuthorNameIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001b) Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) Japan
R. Jarrige (1988) Alimentation des Bovins, Ovins et Caprins INRA Paris, France
R. Lal J. P. Bruce (1999) ArticleTitleThe Potential of World Cropland Soils to Sequester C and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect Environmental Science and Policy 2 IssueID2 177–185
A. S. Manne R. G. Richels (2001) ArticleTitleAn Alternative Approach to Establishing Trade-Offs Among Greenhouse Gases Nature 410 675–677 Occurrence Handle10.1038/35070541
B. A. McCarl U. A. Schneider (2001) ArticleTitleGreenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture and Forestry Science 294 2481–2482 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1064193
R. G. Newell R. N. Stavins (2003) ArticleTitleCost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings of Market-Based Policies Journal of Regulatory Economics 23 IssueID1 43–59 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1021879330491
I. Perez W. Britz (2003) ArticleTitleReduction of Global Warming Emissions in the European Agriculture through a Tradable Permit System. An Analysis with the Regional Agricultural Model CAPRI Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V. Bd. 39 283–290
Perez, I., W. Britz and C. Wieck (2003), ‘Modeling of Passive Environmental Indicators for the European Agriculture: The Role of Marginal Abatement Costs’. Contributed paper, 12th Annual Conference of the EARE, Bilbao, Spain
Perez, I., W. Britz and K. Holm-Müller (2004), ‘The Use of Tradable Permits in the European Agriculture as a Feasible and Cost-Effective Mitigation Strategy’, in GHG Emissions from Agriculture. Mitigation Options and Strategies (Conference Proceedings), pp. 335–336
J. M. Reilly R. G. Prinn J. Harnisch J. Fitzmaurice H. D. Jacoby D. Kicklighter J. Melillo P. Stone A. Sokolov C. Wang (1999) ArticleTitleMulti-Gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol Nature 401 549–555 Occurrence Handle10.1038/44069
W. H. Schlesinger (2000) ArticleTitleCarbon Sequestration in Soils: Some Cautions Amidst Optimism Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 82 IssueID1–3 121–127
U. A. Schneider B. A. McCarl (2003) ArticleTitleEconomic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation Environmental and Resource Economics 24 291–312 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023632309097
L. L. Viguier M. H. Babiker J. M. Reilly (2003) ArticleTitleThe Costs of the Kyoto Protocol in the European Union Energy Policy 31 IssueID5 459–481 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00075-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Cara, S., Houzé, M. & Jayet, PA. Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agriculture in the EU: A Spatial Assessment of Sources and Abatement Costs. Environ Resource Econ 32, 551–583 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-0071-8
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-0071-8
Key words
- agriculture
- climate change
- European Union
- greenhouse gas emissions
- marginal abatement costs
- methane
- nitrous oxide