Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a Local-Scale Spatially Refined Multimedia Fate Model (LSRMFM) for Urban-Scale Risk Assessment: Model Formulation, GIS-Based Preprocessing, and Case Study

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A local-scale spatially refined multimedia fate model (LSRMFM) was developed to evaluate in detail the multimedia transport of organic compounds at a spatial level. The model was derived using a combination of an advection–dispersion–reaction partial differential equation, a steady-state multimedia fugacity model, and a geographical information system. The model was applied to predicting four major volatile organic compounds that are produced as emissions (benzene, toluene, xylene, and styrene) in an urban and industrial area (the 50 × 50-km area was divided into 0.5 × 0.5-km segments) in Korea. To test the accuracy of the model, the LSRMFM was used to predict the extent of dispersion and the data compared with actual measured concentrations and the results of a generic multimedia fate model (GMFM). The results indicated that the method developed herein is appropriate for predicting long-term multimedia pollution. However, the comparison study also illustrated that the developed model has some limitations (e.g., steady-state assumption) in terms of explaining all the observed concentrations, and additional verification and study (e.g., validation using a large observed data set, integration with a more accurate runoff model) would be desirable. In comparing LSRMFM and GMFM, discrepancies between the LSRMFM and GMFM outputs were found, as the result of geographical effects, even though the environmental parameters were identical. The geographical variation for LSRMFM output indicated the existence of considerable local human and ecological risks, whereas the GMFM output indicated less average risk. These results demonstrate that the model has the potential for improving the management of pollutant levels under these refined spatial conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mackay, D. (1979). Finding fugacity feasible. Environmental Science & Technology, 13(10), 1219–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mackay, D., & Diamond, M. (1989). Application of the QWASI (quantitative water air sediment interaction) fugacity model to the dynamics of organic and inorganic chemicals in lakes. Chemosphere, 18(7/8), 1343–1365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mackay, D., & Paterson. (1991). Evaluating the multimedia fate of organic chemicals: A level III fugacity model. Environmental Science & Technology, 25(3), 427–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van de Meent, D. (1993). SimpleBOX: A generic multi-media fate evaluation model. RIVM report no. 6727200001. The Netherlands: Bilthoven.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devillers, J., & Bintein, S. (1995). CHEMFRANCE: A regional level III fugacity model applied to France. Chemosphere, 30(3), 457–476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackay, D., Di Guardo, A., Paterson, S., & Cowan, C. E. (1996). Evaluating the environmental fate of a variety of types of chemicals using the EQC model. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 15(9), 1627–1637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fenner, K., Scheringer, M., & Hungerbuhler, K. (2000). Persistence of parent compounds and transformation products in a level IV multimedia model. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(17), 3809–3817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cousins, I. T., & Mackay, D. (2001). Strategies for including vegetation compartments in multimedia models. Chemosphere, 44(4), 643–654.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tao, S., Yang, Y., Cao, H. Y., Liu, W. X., Coveney, R. M., Xu, F. L., et al. (2006). Modeling the dynamic changes in concentrations of g-hexachlorocyclohexane (g-HCH) in Tianjin region from 1953 to 2020. Environmental Pollution, 139(1), 183–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Priemer, D. A., & Diamond, M. L. (2002). Application of the multimedia urban model to compare the fate of SOCs in an urban and forested watershed. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(5), 1004–1013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollander, A., Baijens, I., Ragas, A., Huijbregts, M., & van de Meent, D. (2007). Validation of predicted exponential concentration profiles of chemicals in soils. Environmental Pollution, 147(3), 757–763.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Suzuki, N., Murasawa, K., Sakurai, T., Nansai, K., Matsuhashi, K., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004). Geo-referenced multimedia environmental fate model (G-CIEMS): Model formulation and comparison to the generic model and monitoring approaches. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(21), 5682–5693.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wania, F. (1996). Spatial variability in compartmental fate modelling. linking fugacity models and GIS. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 3(1), 39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woodfine, D., Macleod, M., & Mackay, D. (2002). A regionally segmented national scale multimedia contaminant fate model for Canada with GIS data input and display. Environmental Pollution, 119(3), 341–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, Q., Crittenden, J. C., Sonnard, D., & Mihelcic, J. R. (2003). Development and evaluation of an environmental multimedia fate model CHEMGL for the great lakes region. Chemosphere, 50(10), 1377–1397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prevedouros, K., MacLeod, M., Jones, K. C., & Sweetman, A. J. (2004). Modelling the fate of persistent organic pollutants in Europe: Parameterisation of a gridded distribution model. Environmental Pollution, 128(1), 251–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, Y., Gao, Q., & Yang, X. (2007). Dynamic modeling of chemical fate and transport in multimedia environments at watershed scale—I: Theoretical considerations and model implementation. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(1), 44–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fann, N., Hubbell, B. (2008) Performing local-scale health impact assessments with near-field air quality modeling. 7th annual CMAS conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6–8

  19. Chapra, S. C. (1997). Surface water-quality modeling (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Merks, R. M. H., Hoekstra, A. G., & Sloot, P. M. A. (2002). The moment propagation method for advection-diffusion in the lattice Boltzmann method: Validation and Péclet number limits. Journal of Computational Physics, 183(2), 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackay, D. (2001). Multimedia environmental fate model: The fugacity approach (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: Lewis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Trapp, S., & Matthies, M. (1998). Chemodynamics and environmental modeling: An introduction (Firstth ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, J. H., Kim, M.-S., Kwak, B. K., Yoo, H. S., Shin, C. B., & Yi, J. (2006). Development of national scale environmental & geographical information system for supporting exposure assessment. Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineering, 28(10), 1082–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, J. H., Kwak, B. K., Shin, C. B., Park, H.-S., Choi, K., Lee, S. M., et al. (2009). Speed-up of the disaggregation of emission inventories and increased resolution of disaggregated maps using landuse data. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 26(6), 1620–1629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, J. H., Kwak, B. K., Park, H.-S., Kim, N. G., Choi, K., & Yi, J. (2010). A GIS-based national emission inventory of major VOCs and risk assessment modeling: Part I—methodology and spatial pattern of emissions. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 27(1), 129–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (1998). Atmospheric chemistry and physics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Geyer, W. R., & Signell, R. P. (1992). A reassessment of the role of tidal dispersion in estuaries. Estuaries, 15(2), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jenson, S. K., & Domingue, J. O. (1988). Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54(11), 1593–1600.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maidment, D. R. (2002). ARC hydro—GIS for water resources (1st ed.). Redlands: ESRI.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zawar-Reza, P., Kingham, S., & Pearce, J. (2005). Evaluation of a year-ling dispersion modeling of PM10 using the mesoscale model TAPM for Christchurch, New Zealand. The Science of the Total Environment, 349(1–3), 249–259.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McCay, D. P. F., Whittier, N., Ward, M., Santos, C. (2006) Spill hazard evaluation for chemicals shipped in bulk using modeling, Environ. Modelling and Software, 21(2), 156–169.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huijbregts, M. A. J., Thissen, U., Guinee, Jager, T., Kalf, D., van de Meent, D., et al. (2000). Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: Calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. Chemosphere, 41(4), 541–573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the ECO-Technopia-21 Project of the Ministry of Environment in Korea for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jongheop Yi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.H., Kwak, B.K., Shin, C.B. et al. Development of a Local-Scale Spatially Refined Multimedia Fate Model (LSRMFM) for Urban-Scale Risk Assessment: Model Formulation, GIS-Based Preprocessing, and Case Study. Environ Model Assess 16, 265–281 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9250-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-011-9250-x

Keywords

Navigation