Skip to main content

Spatial and Temporal Extension of a Novel Hybrid Source Apportionment Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXIII

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

Exposure assessment and development of control strategies are limited by the air pollutants measured and the spatial and temporal resolution of the observations. Air quality modeling can provide more comprehensive estimates of the temporal and spatial variation of pollutant concentrations, however with significant uncertainties. Source apportionment, which can be conducted as part of the air quality modeling, provides estimates of the impacts of sources on the mixtures of pollutants and contains surrogate estimates for pollutants that are not measured. This study details results using a novel spatiotemporal hybrid source apportionment method employed with interpolation techniques to quantify the impact of 33 PM2.5 source categories. The hybrid model, which aims to reduce estimating uncertainties, adjusts original source impact estimates from a chemical transport model at monitoring sites to closely reflect observed ambient concentrations of measured PM2.5 species. Daily source impacts are calculated for the contiguous U.S. Two interpolation methods are used to generate the data needed for spatiotemporal hybrid source apportionment. Hybrid adjustment factors are spatially interpolated using kriging, and daily observations are calculated by temporally interpolating available monitoring data. Methods are evaluated by comparing daily simulated concentrations—generated by reconstruction of source impact results—to observed species concentrations from monitors independent of model development. Results also elucidate U.S. regions with relatively higher impacts from specific sources. Monitoring data in this study originated from the Chemical Speciation Network (CSN), EPA-funded supersites, and the Southeastern Aerosol Research Characterization (SEARCH) Network. Results are to be used in health impact assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Watson JG, Cooper JA, Huntzicker JJ (1984) The effective variance weighting for least-squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model. Atmos Environ 18(7):1347–1355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thurston G et al (2005) Results and implications of the workshop on the source apportionment of PM health effects. Epidemiology 16(5):S134–S135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Darrow LA et al (2011) “Ambient Air pollution and birth weight in full-term infants in Atlanta”, 1994-2004. Environ Health Perspect 119(5):731–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Napelenok SL et al (2006) Decoupled direct 3D sensitivity analysis for particulate matter (DDM-3D/PM). Atmos Environ 40(32):6112–6121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen DA et al (2003) The southeastern aerosol research and characterization study: 1-overview. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53(12):1460–1471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi YJ, Fernando HJS (2008) Implementation of a windblown dust parameterization into MODELS-3/CMAQ: application to episodic PM events in the US/Mexico border. Atmos Environ 42(24):6039–6046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tian D et al (2009) Assessment of biomass burning emissions and their impacts on urban and regional PM2.5: a Georgia case study. Environ Sci Technol 43(2):299–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible in part by USEPA STAR grants R833626, R833866, R834799 and RD83479901 and by NASA project SV6-76007 under grant NNG04GE15G. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the grantee and do not necessarily represent the official views of the USEPA and NASA. Further, neither USEPA nor NASA endorses the purchase of any commercial products or services mentioned in the publication. We also acknowledge the Southern Company for their support and thank Eric Edgerton of ARA, Inc. for access to the SEARCH data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesunica Ivey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ivey, C., Holmes, H., Hu, Y., Mulholland, J.A., Russell, A.G. (2014). Spatial and Temporal Extension of a Novel Hybrid Source Apportionment Model. In: Steyn, D., Mathur, R. (eds) Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XXIII. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04379-1_101

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics