An assessment of the impact of an illustrative portfolio of policy instruments that address different sustainability concerns in the global energy system in areas of climate change, air pollution and introduction of renewable-energy resources is conducted. The effects of a policy set containing three instruments, implemented either individually or in combination, were examined. The policy instruments under examination in this work include: Cap-and-Trade policies imposing a CO2 emission reduction target on the global energy system, a renewable portfolio standard that forces a minimum share of renewable electricity generation, and the internalisation of external costs of power generation associated with local pollution. Implementation of these policy instruments significantly changes the structure and environmental performance of the energy sector, and particularly the structure of the electric-generation sector. The positive effects are amplified when the policy instruments are simultaneously applied, illustrating the potential for synergies between these energy-policy domains. The analysis has been conducted with the multi-regional, energy-system Global MARKAL Model (GMM), a “bottom-up” partial-equilibrium model that provides a detailed representation of energy technologies and endogenizes technology learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
IEA (International Energy Agency), Towards a Sustainable Energy Future (International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 2001).
L. Schrattenholzer, A. Miketa, K. Riahi, R. Roehrl, B. Zhu, G. Totschnig and M. Strubegger, Achieving a sustainable global energy system, in: ESRI Studies Series on the Environment (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 2004).
EC (European Commission), Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment (Document COM(2002) 276 Final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2002).
IEA (International Energy Agency), Creating Markets for Energy Technologies (International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, 2003).
N. Beg, J.C. Morlot, O. Davidson, Y. Afrane-Okesse, L. Tyani, F. Denton, Y. Sokona, J.P. Thomas, E. Lèbre La Rovere, J.K. Parikh, K. Parikh and A. Rahman, Linkages between climate change and sustainable development, Climate Policy 77 (2002) 1–16.
L. Barreto, Technological Learning in Energy Optimisation Models and Deployment of Emerging Technologies, PhD dissertation No. 14151, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (2001).
L. Barreto and S. Kypreos, Emissions trading and technology deployment in an energy-systems “Bottom-Up” model with technology learning, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158 (2004) 243–261.
P. Rafaj, S. Kypreos and L. Barreto, Flexible carbon mitigation policies: Analysis with a global multi-regional MARKAL model, in: Coupling Climate and Economic Dynamics, eds. A. Haurie and L. Viguier (Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2005).
L.G. Fishbone and H. Abilock, MARKAL, a linear-programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the BNL version, Int. J. Energy Res. 5 (1981) 353–375.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Special Report on Emission Scenarios, A Special Report of the Working Group III of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
K. Riahi and R.A. Roehrl, Greenhouse gas emissions in a dynamics-as-usual scenario of economic and energy development, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63(2–3) (2000) 175–205.
L. Barreto and S. Kypreos, Multi-regional technological learning in the energy-systems MARKAL model, Int. J. Glob Energy Issues 17(3) (2002) 189–213.
R. Loulou, G. Goldstein and K. Noble, Documentation for the MARKAL Family of Models, Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme (ETSAP)/IEA (2004) (http://www.etsap.org/tools.htm).
S. Messner, Endogenised technological learning in an energy systems model, J. Evol. Econ. 7 (1997) 291–313.
A. McDonald and L. Schrattenholzer, Learning rates for energy technologies, Energy Policy 29(4) (2001) 255–261.
R. Loulou and D. Lavigne, MARKAL model with elastic demands: Application to greenhouse gas emission control, in: Operations Research and Environmental Management, eds. C. Carraro and A. Haurie (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 1996) pp. 201–220.
A. Kanudia and R. Loulou, Advanced bottom-up modelling for national and regional energy planning in response to climate change, Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 12(2–3) (1999) 191–216.
UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), The Kyoto Protocol to the Convention on Climate Change, UNFCCC Climate Change Secretariat and UNEP, UNEP/IUC/99/10, Geneva, Switzerland (1999).
EC (European Commission), ExternE – Externalities of Energy, JOULE III Non-Nuclear-Energy Programme, ExternE Final Report (1998) (see also: http://externe.jrc.es).
T.M.L. Wigley, R. Richels and J.A. Edmonds, Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, Nature 379 (1996) 240–243.
O. Blanchard, P. Criqui, A. Kitous and L. Viguier, Combining efficiency with equity: A pragmatic approach, in: Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization, eds. I. Kaul, P. Conceição, K. Le Goulven and R.U. Mendoza (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).
G.J. Schaeffer, M.G. Boots, J.W. Martens and M.H. Voogt, Tradable green certificates: a new market-based incentive scheme for renewable energy: Introduction and analysis, Report ECN-I-99-004, Petten, The Netherlands (1999).
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), World energy assessment: Energy and the challenge of sustainability, United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Energy Council, ed. J. Goldemberg (New York, USA, 2000).
ACROPOLIS (Assessing Climate Response Options: POLIcy Simulations), Final report April 2001–September 2003, Prepared by IER Germany and IPTS-JRC Spain, Contract No: ENK6-CT-2000-00443, Framework Programme V (2003).
GeoHive, Global Statistics, Electronic database of global statistical information maintained by J. van der Heyden (2003) (see also: http://www.geohive.com).
W. Hinrichs, Stoffmengenflüsse und Energiebedarf bei der Gewinnung ausgewählter mineralischer Rohstoffe, Teilstudie Steinkohle, Reihe H, Wirtschaftsgeologie, Berichte zur Rohstoffwirtschaft, Heft SH 4, Geologisches Jahrbuch, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Germany (1999).
J.-C. Hourcade, M. Haduong, A. Gruebler and R.S.J. Tol, INASUD project findings on integrated assessment of climate policies, Integrated Assessment 2(1) (2001) 31–35.
A. Miketa and L. Schrattenholzer, Equity implications of two burden-sharing rules for stabilizing greenhouse-gas concentrations, Energy Policy, in press, Available online 8 October 2004.
P. Rafaj, Analysis of Policies Contributing to Sustainability of the Global Energy System Using the Global Multi-regional Markal Model (GMM), PhD Dissertation No 16122, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland (2005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rafaj, P., Barreto, L. & Kypreos, S. Combining policy instruments for sustainable energy systems: An assessment with the GMM model. Environ Model Assess 11, 277–295 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-005-9037-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-005-9037-z