Skip to main content
Log in

Petaling failure of pressurized pipelines subjected to the impact load by sphere penetrators

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Petaling failures of pressurized pipelines subjected to impact loads by sphere penetrators are systematically analyzed. In this paper, nonlinear finite element models are established considering geometric nonlinearity and material nonlinearity. Qualitative descriptions of the petaling mode are performed to recognize the failure patterns and phenomena. Extensive parametric studies are conducted to investigate the effects of various dominant parameters on deflection responses. Impact limits are studied to reveal the triggering conditions of rupture and perforation. Furthermore, an analytical model is developed based on the plastic hinge to predict the perforation limit and the residual velocity. The comparisons indicate that the analytical model has a good agreement with numerical results. The results conclude the failure features and impact limits for pressurized pipelines subject to sphere penetrator impacts, which are profound for damage assessment and protection design for pressurized tubular members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majid ZA, Mohsin R, Yaacob Z, Hassan Z (2010) Failure analysis of natural gas pipes. Eng Fail Anal 17:818–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alghamdi AAA (2001) Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview. Thin-Walled Struct 39:189–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Liang Z, Han C, Zhang H (2015) Buckling behaviour analysis of a buried steel pipeline in rock stratum impacted by a rockfall. Eng Fail Anal 58:281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu Z, Amdahl J (2018) A review of structural responses and design of offshore tubular structures subjected to ship impacts. Ocean Eng 154:177–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu XX, Liu JH, Zhang LP, Meng LP (2018) Numerical simulation analysis of petaling formation process of plate penetrated by sharp-nosed missile. Chin J Ship Res 13:10–117

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li Y, Wu WG, Zhang L, Du ZP (2017) Mechanism research of thin plate petaling under local loading based on multiaxial stress damage. Explos Shock Wave 37:554–559

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xue JH, Hoo Fatt MS (2001) Buckle propagation in pipelines with non-uniform thickness. Ocean Eng 28:1383–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Macdonald KA, Cosham A, Alexander CR, Hopkins P (2007) Assessing mechanical damage in offshore pipelines—two case studies. Eng Fail Anal 14:1667–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben-Dor G, Dubinsky A, Elperin T (2005) Ballistic impact: recent advances in analytical modeling of plate penetration dynamics—a review. Appl Mech Rev 58:355–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Børvik T, Forrestal MJ, Hopperstad OS, Warren TL (2009) Perforation of AA5083-H116 aluminium plates with conical-nose steel projectiles—calculations. Int J Impact Eng 36:426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen XW, Li QM (2003) Perforation of a thick plate by rigid projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 28:743–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen XW, Huang XL, Liang GJ (2011) Comparative analysis of perforation models of metallic plates by rigid sharp-nosed projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 38:613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Forrestal MJ, Warren TL (2009) Perforation equations for conical and ogival nose rigid projectiles into aluminum target plates. Int J Impact Eng 36:220–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Piekutowski AJ, Forrestal MJ, Poormon KL, Warren TL (1996) Perforation of aluminum plates with ogive-nose steel rods at normal and oblique impacts. Int J Impact Eng 18:877–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Antoinat L, Kubler R, Barou JL, Viot P (2015) Perforation of aluminium alloy thin plates. Int J Impact Eng 75:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palmer A, Neilson A, Sivadasan S (2006) Pipe perforation by medium-velocity impact. Int J Impact Eng 32:1145–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rusinek A, Rodríguez-Martínez JA, Zaera R, Klepaczko JR (2009) Experimental and numerical study on the perforation process of mild steel sheets subjected to perpendicular impact by hemispherical projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 36:565–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerik BC, Shin HK, Cho SR (2016) A comparative study on damage assessment of tubular members subjected to mass impact. Mar Struct 46:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruggieri C, Ferrari JA (2004) Structural behavior of dented tubular members under lateral loads. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng Trans ASME 126:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou Y, Zhang SH (2021) Rupture and perforation responses of pressurized tubular members subjected to medium-velocity transverse impact loading. Eng Fail Anal 127:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan Y, Matzen VC, Yu L (2002) Correlation of test and FEA results for the nonlinear behavior of straight pipes and elbows. J Press Vessel Technol Trans ASME 124:465–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Balan C, Redekop D (2005) The effect of bi-directional loading on fatigue assessment of pressurized piping elbows with local thinned areas. Int J Press Vessels Pip 82:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Børvik T, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS, Malo KA (1999) Ballistic penetration of steel plates. Int J Impact Eng 22:855–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones N, Birch RS (2010) Low-velocity impact of pressurised pipelines. Int J Impact Eng 37:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nishida M, Tanaka K (2006) Experimental study of perforation and cracking of water-filled aluminum tubes impacted by steel spheres. Int J Impact Eng 32:2000–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Børvik T, Hopperstad OS, Berstad T, Langseth M (2001) Numerical simulation of plugging failure in ballistic penetration. Int J Solids Struct 38:6241–6264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bai Y, Bai Q (2010) Subsea engineering handbook. Gulf Professional Publishing, New York, pp 915–919

    Google Scholar 

  28. DNV-OS-F101 (2010) Submarine pipeline systems. Det Norske Veritas, Norway

  29. Guarracino F, Fraldi M, Giordano A (2008) Analysis of testing methods of pipelines for limit state design. Appl Ocean Res 30:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones N, Birch RS (1996) Influence of internal pressure on the impact behavior of steel pipelines. J Press Vessel Tech Trans ASME 118:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang R, Zhi XD, Fan F (2018) Plastic behavior of circular steel tubes subjected to low-velocity transverse impact. Int J Impact Eng 114:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson GR, Holmquist TJ (1988) Evaluation of cylinder-impact test data for constitutive model constants evaluation of cylinder-Impact test data for constitutive model constants. J Appl Phys 64:3901–3910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Steinberg DJ, Cochran SG, Guinan MW (1980) A constitutive model for metals applicable at high-strain rate. J Appl Phys 51:1498–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21:31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Corbett GG, Reid SR, Al-Hassani STS (1990) Static and dynamic penetration of steel tubes by hemispherically nosed punches. Int J Impact Eng 9:165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bradford L, Dong S, Nicol D, Westmann R (1984) A central crack element in fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 24:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson WC, Martin G (1990) Influence of elastic stress on the growth kinetics of planar thin-film binary diffusion couples. J Appl Phys 68:1252–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Landkof B, Goldsmith W (1985) Petalling of thin, metallic plates during penetration by cylindro-conical projectiles. Int J Solids Struct 21:245–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu SX, Wu WG, Li XB, Kong XS (2010) Petal failure characteristics of a conical projectile penetrating a thin plate at high oblique angle. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Sci) 15:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gupta PK, Gupta NK (2006) Computational and experimental studies of crushing of metallic hemispherical shells. Arch Appl Mech 76:511–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Zhang, S. Petaling failure of pressurized pipelines subjected to the impact load by sphere penetrators. J Eng Math 133, 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-022-10208-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-022-10208-9

Keywords

Navigation