Skip to main content
Log in

A general solution to low-aspect-ratio flat-ship theory

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A common characteristic of the various methods of modern planing analysis has been the assumption that the Froude number is high enough that gravity has negligible effect relative to convection in the fluid pressure. There are some experimental indications that it is not, with differences conjectured to be due to wave lift and drag associated with the divergent gravity-wave system in the surface flow field generated by the boat. Maruo (Schiffstechnik 72 (1967) 57) presents an integral equation for flat low-aspect-ratio planing hulls. Previous authors have attempted to develop a general solution to this integral equation with limited success. A general solution has been developed and the infamous singularity has been eliminated. The lift coefficients computed with the general solution agree with those presented by previous authors and more realistic (elliptical) pressure distributions have been obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Von Karman T (1929) The impact of seaplane floats during landing. NACA TN 321. Academy Press, Washington, DC

  2. Wagner H (1932) Uber stoss-und gleitvorgange an der oberflache von flussigkeiten. Zeitschrift fur Angew Math Mech 12: 193–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tulin MP (1957) The theory of slender surfaces planing at high speeds. Schiffstechnik 21: 125–133

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scottorf WF (1932) Experiments with planing surfaces. NACA TM No. 661

  5. Sambrous A (1938) Planing surface tests at large Froude numbers—airfoil comparison. NACA TM No. 848

  6. Maruo H (1967) High and low-aspect-ratio approximation of planing surfaces. Schiffstechnik 72: 57–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tuck EO (1975) Low-aspect-ratio flat-ship theory. J Hydronaut 9(1): 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole S (1988) A simple example from flat-ship theory. J Fluid Mech 189: 301–310

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Michell J (1897) The wave resistance of a ship. Philos Mag 5(45): 106–123

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (2000) Table of integrals, series, and products, 6th edn. Academic Press, San Diego

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1964) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover Publications, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mathematica Online Integrator (2008) Wolfram Research, Inc. http://integrals.wolfram.com

  13. Xie N et al (2005) A study of three-dimensional planing surface. Ocean Eng 32: 1539–1555

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Taravella BM (2009) A hybrid method for predicting lift and drag of semi-planing/semi-displacement hull forms. Dissertation, University of New Orleans

  15. Press et al (1992) Numerical recipes in FORTRAN 77: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon M. Taravella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taravella, B.M., Vorus, W.S. A general solution to low-aspect-ratio flat-ship theory. J Eng Math 71, 171–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-010-9431-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-010-9431-7

Keywords

Navigation