Skip to main content
Log in

Macroeconomic variables and the sovereign risk premia in EMU, non-EMU EU, and developed countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This project studies and models key macroeconomic variables and their impact on sovereign risk premia across select European economies and developed countries. The sample is divided into three groups of countries: those in the European Monetary Union (EMU); the standalone economies outside the EMU but members of the broader European Union (EU); and other developed economies. The main subject of examination across all three groups is the impact of macroeconomic variables on sovereign borrowing costs. EU countries have experienced high financial stress and a rapid rise in the credit default swaps (CDS) spreads during the EMU debt crisis. A nonlinear vector smooth transition autoregressive model is applied to investigate such a regime change in the finance-output link using sovereign CDS and industrial production index. The paper finds that regime-switching takes place rather suddenly in most EMU countries. The study concludes that due to the potential spillover effects in the EU as a whole, the individual country macroeconomic indicators were less reflected in the financial stress and spillover and contagion effects became dominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions on the earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arkady Gevorkyan.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Background of the selected Countries

See Tables 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.

Table 6 Announcements by ECB for Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Table 7 Announcements by Romanian Central Bank (Fig.  7)
Table 8 Announcements by Polish Central Bank (Fig. 8)
Table 9 Announcements by Hungarian Central Bank (Fig. 9)
Table 10 Announcements by Czech Republic Central Bank (Fig. 10)

Appendix 2: Empirical analysis

See Figs. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32.

Fig. 12
figure 12

SACF for returns

Fig. 13
figure 13

SACF for return (continued)

Fig. 14
figure 14

SACF for normalized error

Fig. 15
figure 15

SACF for normalized error

Fig. 16
figure 16

Sample log returns versus GARCH simulated returns

Fig. 17
figure 17

Sample log returns versus GARCH simulated returns

Fig. 18
figure 18

Transition function of Poland and Hungary

Fig. 19
figure 19

Transition function of Czech Republic and Ireland

Fig. 20
figure 20

Transition function of US and Japan

Fig. 21
figure 21

Transition function of Italy and Spain

Fig. 22
figure 22

Transition function of UK and Greece

Fig. 23
figure 23

Impulse Response Poland (high and low regimes)

Fig. 24
figure 24

Impulse Response Hungary (high and low regimes)

Fig. 25
figure 25

Impulse Response the Czech Republic (high and low regimes)

Fig. 26
figure 26

Impulse Response Ireland (high and low regimes)

Fig. 27
figure 27

Impulse Response Italy (high and low regimes)

Fig. 28
figure 28

Impulse Response the United States (high and low regimes)

Fig. 29
figure 29

Impulse Response Japan (high and low regimes)

Fig. 30
figure 30

Impulse Response the UK (high and low regimes)

Fig. 31
figure 31

Impulse Response Greece (high and low regimes)

Fig. 32
figure 32

Impulse Response Spain (high and low regimes)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gevorkyan, A., Semmler, W. Macroeconomic variables and the sovereign risk premia in EMU, non-EMU EU, and developed countries. Empirica 43, 1–35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9286-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-015-9286-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation