Skip to main content
Log in

Are the effects of fiscal policy really nonlinear? A note

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a panel data model, Giavazzi, Jappelli and Pagano (2000, European Economic Review 44, 1259–1289) recently found evidence that national saving in OECD countries responds nonlinearly to fiscal policy, the nonlinearity being associated with the size and persistence of the fiscal impulse. The existence of this nonlinearity would have important policy implications because it implies that the short-run costs of a fiscal consolidation program are lower the larger and more persistent it is. However, this paper shows that their finding is not robust, one reason being the inadequacy of the slope homogeneity assumption implicit in their panel model and another reason being their reliance on an implausibly large number of episodes of large and persistent fiscal impulses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • van Aarle B, Garretsen H (2003) Keynesian, Non-Keynesian or no effects of fiscal policy changes? The EMU case. J Macroecon 25:213–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Ardagna S (1998) Tales of fiscal adjustment. Econ Policy 27:487–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Perotti R (1995) Fiscal expansions and adjustments in OECD countries. Econ Policy 21:207–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Perotti R (1996) Reducing budget deficits. Swedish Econ Policy Rev 3:113–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez J, Arellano M (1998) The Time Series and Cross-Section Asymptotics of Dynamic Panel Data Estimators. CEMFI Working Paper 9808. Madrid

  • Blanchard OJ (1990) Comment on “Francesco Giavazzi and Marco Pagano, can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary?” In: Blanchard OJ, Fischer S (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen A (1990) Comment on “Francesco Giavazzi and Marco Pagano, can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary?”. In: Blanchard OJ, Fischer S (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Giavazzi F, Jappelli T, Pagano M (2000) Searching for Non-Linear Effects of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from Industrial and Developing Countries. Euro Econ Rev 44:1259–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giavazzi F, Pagano M (1990) Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? In: Blanchard OJ, Fischer S (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Giavazzi F, Pagano M (1996) Non-Keynesian effects of fiscal policy changes: international evidence and the Swedish experience. Swedish Econ Policy Rev 3:67–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque NU, Pesaran MH, Sharma S (2000) Neglected heterogeneity and dynamics in cross-country savings regressions. In: Krishnakumar J, Ronchetti E (eds) Panel data econometrics: future directions. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylen F, Everaert G (2000) Success and Failure of Fiscal Consolidation in the OECD: A Multivariate Analysis. Publ Choice 105:103–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeppner F, Wesche K (2000) ‘Non-Linear Effects of Fiscal Policy in Germany: A Markov-Switching Approach’. Bonn Econ Discussion Paper 9/2000. University of Bonn

  • Hogan V (2004) Expansionary fiscal contractions? evidence from panel data. Scand J Econ 106:647–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamps C (2001) Fiscal Consolidation in Europe: Pre- and Post-Maastricht. Kiel Working Paper 1028. Institute for World Economics, Kiel

  • Neumann T (2001) Expansionary fiscal consolidations: evidence from time-varying coefficient VARs for Germany. Appl Econ Quart 47:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–708

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1996) The experience with fiscal consolidation in OECD countries. Econ Outlook 59:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004a) Economic outlook 75. June. Paris

  • OECD (2004b) Annual National Accounts—Volume 1, 1970-2002 (2003 prov.) – Main Aggregates, Vol. 2004 release 04. Paris

  • Perotti R (1999) Fiscal policy in good times and bad. Quart J Econ 114:1399–1436

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarantis N, Stewart C (2001) Saving behaviour in OECD countries: evidence from panel cointegration tests. Manchester School 69:22–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland A (1997) Fiscal crises and aggregate demand: can high public debt reverse the effect of fiscal policy? J Publ Econ 65:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was written while I was an Economist in the Business Cycles Department of the Kiel Institute for World Economics. I would like to thank three anonymous referees, my former colleagues at the Kiel Institute and seminar participants at the 2001 EEA and IIPF annual meetings as well as Jörg Döpke, M. Lee Greene and Roberto Perotti for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper (Kamps 2001). This views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the Kiel Institute or the European Central Bank.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Kamps.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamps, C. Are the effects of fiscal policy really nonlinear? A note. Empirica 33, 113–125 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-006-9010-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-006-9010-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation