Abstract
Computer-aided (in silico) prediction has shown good potential to support the environmental risk assessment (ERA) of pharmaceutical emerging contaminants (PECs), allowing low-cost, animal-free, high-throughput screening of multiple potential risks posed by a wide variety of pharmaceuticals in the environment based on insufficient toxicity data. This review provided recent insights regarding the application of in silico approaches in prediction for environmental risks of PECs. Based on the review of 20 included articles from 8 countries published since 2018, we found that the researchers’ interest and concern in this research topic were sharply aroused since 2021. Recently, in silico approaches have been widely used for the prediction of bioaccumulation and biodegradability, lethal endpoints, developmental toxicity, mutagenicity, other eco-toxicological effects such as ototoxicity and hematological toxicity, and human health hazards of exposure to PECs. Particular attention has been given to the simultaneous discernment of multiple environmental risks and health effects of PECs based on mechanistic data of pharmaceuticals using advanced bioinformatic methods such as transcriptomic analysis and network pharmacology prediction. In silico software platforms and databases used in the included studies were diversified, and there is currently no standardized and accepted in silico model for ERA of PECs. Date suggested that in silico prediction of the environmental risks posed by PECs is still in its infancy. Considerable critical challenges need to be addressed, including consideration of environmental exposure concentration for PECs, interactions among mixtures of PECs and other contaminants coexisting in environments, and development of in silico models specific to ERA of PECs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Anand, U., Adelodun, B., Cabreros, C., Kumar, P., Suresh, S., Dey, A., Ballesteros, F., Jr., & Bontempi, E. (2022). Occurrence, transformation, bioaccumulation, risk and analysis of pharmaceutical and personal care products from wastewater: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 20(6), 3883–3904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01498-7
Ankley, G. T., Berninger, J. P., Maloney, E. M., Olker, J. H., Schaupp, C. M., Villeneuve, D. L., & Lalone, C. A. (2022). Linking mechanistic effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products to ecologically relevant outcomes: A decade of progress. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5416
Atzei, A., Jense, I., Zwart, E. P., Legradi, J., Venhuis, B. J., Van Der Ven, L. T. M., Heusinkveld, H. J., & Hessel, E. V. S. (2021). Developmental neurotoxicity of environmentally relevant pharmaceuticals and mixtures thereof in a zebrafish embryo behavioural test. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136717
Badry, A., Treu, G., Gkotsis, G., Nika, M. C., Alygizakis, N., Thomaidis, N. S., Voigt, C. C., & Krone, O. (2022). Ecological and spatial variations of legacy and emerging contaminants in white-tailed sea eagles from Germany: Implications for prioritisation and future risk management. Environment International, 158, 106934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106934
Cunha, D. L., Mendes, M. P., & Marques, M. (2019). Environmental risk assessment of psychoactive drugs in the aquatic environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3556-z
De Vaugelade, S., Nicol, E., Vujovic, S., Bourcier, S., Pirnay, S., & Bouchonnet, S. (2017). UV-vis degradation of alpha-tocopherol in a model system and in a cosmetic emulsion-Structural elucidation of photoproducts and toxicological consequences. Journal of Chromatography. A, 1517, 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.08.015
Della-Flora, A., Wilde, M. L., Pinto, I. D. F., Lima, E. C., & Sirtori, C. (2020). Degradation of the anticancer drug flutamide by solar photo-Fenton treatment at near-neutral pH: Identification of transformation products and in silico (Q)SAR risk assessment. Environmental Research, 183, 109223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109223
Fonseca, V. F., Duarte, I. A., Duarte, B., Freitas, A., Pouca, A. S. V., Barbosa, J., Gillanders, B. M., & Reis-Santos, P. (2021). Environmental risk assessment and bioaccumulation of pharmaceuticals in a large urbanized estuary. Science of the Total Environment, 783, 147021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147021
Garcia-Martin, J. A., Chavarria, M., De Lorenzo, V., & Pazos, F. (2020). Concomitant prediction of environmental fate and toxicity of chemical compounds. Biology Methods and Protocols, 5(1), bpaa025. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpaa025
Gouveia, T. I. A., Alves, A., & Santos, M. S. F. (2019). New insights on cytostatic drug risk assessment in aquatic environments based on measured concentrations in surface waters. Environment International, 133(Pt B), 105236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105236
Guedes-Alonso, R., Montesdeoca-Esponda, S., Pacheco-Juarez, J., Sosa-Ferrera, Z., & Santana-Rodriguez, J. J. (2020). A survey of the presence of pharmaceutical residues in wastewaters. Evaluation of their removal using conventional and natural treatment procedures. Molecules, 25(7), 1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25071639
Guo, J., Liao, M., He, B., Liu, J., Hu, X., Yan, D., & Wang, J. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on household disinfectant consumption behaviors and related environmental concerns: A questionnaire-based survey in China. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(5), 106168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106168
Han, Y., Ma, Y., Chen, B., Zhang, J., & Hu, C. (2022). Hazard assessment of beta-lactams: Integrating in silico and QSTR approaches with in vivo zebrafish embryo toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 229, 113106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113106
Han, Y., Ma, Y., Yao, S., Zhang, J., & Hu, C. (2021). In vivo and in silico evaluations of survival and cardiac developmental toxicity of quinolone antibiotics in zebrafish embryos (Danio rerio). Environmental Pollution, 277, 116779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116779
He, B. S., Wang, J., Liu, J., & Hu, X. M. (2017). Eco-pharmacovigilance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Necessity and opportunities. Chemosphere, 181, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.084
Holm, G., Snape, J. R., Murray-Smith, R., Talbot, J., Taylor, D., & Sorme, P. (2013). Implementing ecopharmacovigilance in practice: Challenges and potential opportunities. Drug Safety, 36(7), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0049-3
Hu, L. X., Olaitan, O. J., Li, Z., Yang, Y. Y., Chimezie, A., Adepoju-Bello, A. A., Ying, G. G., & Chen, C. E. (2021). What is in Nigerian waters? Target and non-target screening analysis for organic chemicals. Chemosphere, 284, 131546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131546
Hua, Y., Shi, Y., Cui, X., & Li, X. (2021). In silico prediction of chemical-induced hematotoxicity with machine learning and deep learning methods. Molecular Diversity, 25(3), 1585–1596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-021-10255-x
Huang, X., Tang, F., Hua, Y., & Li, X. (2021). In silico prediction of drug-induced ototoxicity using machine learning and deep learning methods. Chemical Biology & Drug Design, 98(2), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.13894
Jiao, B., Zhu, Y., Xu, J., Dong, F., Wu, X., Liu, X., & Zheng, Y. (2022). Identification and ecotoxicity prediction of pyrisoxazole transformation products formed in soil and water using an effective HRMS workflow. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 424(Pt A), 127223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127223
Jose, J., Sandra Pinto, J., Kotian, B., Mathew Thomas, A., & Narayana Charyulu, R. (2020). Comparison of the regulatory outline of ecopharmacovigilance of pharmaceuticals in Europe, USA. Japan and Australia. Sci Total Environ, 709, 134815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134815
Kar, S., Roy, K., & Leszczynski, J. (2018). Impact of pharmaceuticals on the environment: Risk assessment using QSAR modeling approach. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1800, 395–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_19
Koltsakidou, A., Antonopoulou, M., Epsilonvgenidou, E., Konstantinou, I., & Lambropoulou, D. (2019). A comparative study on the photo-catalytic degradation of cytarabine anticancer drug under Fe(3+/)H(2)O(2), Fe(3+/)S(2)O(8)(2-), and [Fe(C(2)O(4))(3)](3-)/H(2)O(2) processes. Kinetics, identification, and in silico toxicity assessment of generated transformation products. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 26(8), 7772–7784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-4019-2
Kumar, R., Khan, F. U., Sharma, A., Siddiqui, M. H., Aziz, I. B., Kamal, M. A., Ashraf, G. M., Alghamdi, B. S., & Uddin, M. S. (2021). A deep neural network-based approach for prediction of mutagenicity of compounds. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(34), 47641–47650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14028-9
Kumar, S., Deepika, D., & Kumar, V. (2022). Pharmacophore modeling using machine learning for screening the blood-brain barrier permeation of xenobiotics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(20), 13471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013471
Kunene, P. N., & Mahlambi, P. N. (2023). Case study on antiretroviral drugs uptake from soil irrigated with contaminated water: Bio-accumulation and bio-translocation to roots, stem, leaves, and fruits. Environmental Pollution, 319, 121004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121004
Li, S., Wen, J., He, B., Wang, J., Hu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Occurrence of caffeine in the freshwater environment: Implications for ecopharmacovigilance. Environmental Pollution, 263(Pt B), 114371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114371
Li, S., He, B., Wang, J., Liu, J., & Hu, X. (2020). Risks of caffeine residues in the environment: Necessity for a targeted ecopharmacovigilance program. Chemosphere, 243, 125343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125343
Liu, X., Zhang, H., Xue, Q., Pan, W., & Zhang, A. (2021). In silico health effect prioritization of environmental chemicals through transcriptomics data exploration from a chemo-centric view. Science of the Total Environment, 762, 143082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143082
Marmon, P., Owen, S. F., & Margiotta-Casaluci, L. (2021). Pharmacology-informed prediction of the risk posed to fish by mixtures of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the environment. Environment International, 146, 106222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106222
Miller, T. H., Bury, N. R., Owen, S. F., Macrae, J. I., & Barron, L. P. (2018). A review of the pharmaceutical exposome in aquatic fauna. Environmental Pollution, 239, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.012
Miller, T. H., Gallidabino, M. D., Macrae, J. I., Owen, S. F., Bury, N. R., & Barron, L. P. (2019). Prediction of bioconcentration factors in fish and invertebrates using machine learning. Science of the Total Environment, 648, 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.122
Molnar, E., Maasz, G., & Pirger, Z. (2021). Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals at a seasonal holiday destination in the largest freshwater shallow lake in Central Europe. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(42), 59233–59243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09747-4
Moradi, M., Golmohammadi, R., Najafi, A., Moosazadeh Moghaddam, M., Fasihi-Ramandi, M., & Mirnejad, R. (2022). A contemporary review on the important role of in silico approaches for managing different aspects of COVID-19 crisis. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 28, 100862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2022.100862
Morales-Paredes, C. A., Rodriguez-Diaz, J. M., & Boluda-Botella, N. (2022). Pharmaceutical compounds used in the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of their presence in water and treatment techniques for their elimination. Science of the Total Environment, 814, 152691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152691
Nendza, M., Kuhne, R., Lombardo, A., Strempel, S., & Schuurmann, G. (2018). PBT assessment under REACH: Screening for low aquatic bioaccumulation with QSAR classifications based on physicochemical properties to replace BCF in vivo testing on fish. Science of the Total Environment, 616-617, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.317
Nieto-Juarez, J. I., Torres-Palma, R. A., Botero-Coy, A. M., & Hernandez, F. (2021). Pharmaceuticals and environmental risk assessment in municipal wastewater treatment plants and rivers from Peru. Environment International, 155, 106674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106674
Nozaki, K., Tanoue, R., Kunisue, T., Tue, N. M., Fujii, S., Sudo, N., Isobe, T., Nakayama, K., Sudaryanto, A., Subramanian, A., Bulbule, K. A., Parthasarathy, P., Tuyen, L. H., Viet, P. H., Kondo, M., Tanabe, S., & Nomiyama, K. (2023). Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in surface water and fish from three Asian countries: Species-specific bioaccumulation and potential ecological risks. Science of the Total Environment, 866, 161258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161258
Ofrydopoulou, A., Evgenidou, E., Nannou, C., Vasquez, M. I., & Lambropoulou, D. (2021). Exploring the phototransformation and assessing the in vitro and in silico toxicity of a mixture of pharmaceuticals susceptible to photolysis. Science of the Total Environment, 756, 144079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144079
Raimondo, S., & Forbes, V. E. (2022). Moving beyond risk quotients: Advancing ecological risk assessment to reflect better, more robust and relevant methods. Ecologies (Basel), 3(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies3020012
Raitano, G., Goi, D., Pieri, V., Passoni, A., Mattiussi, M., Lutman, A., Romeo, I., Manganaro, A., Marzo, M., Porta, N., Baderna, D., Colombo, A., Aneggi, E., Natolino, F., Lodi, M., Bagnati, R., & Benfenati, E. (2018). (Eco)toxicological maps: A new risk assessment method integrating traditional and in silico tools and its application in the Ledra River (Italy). Environment International, 119, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.035
Regnery, J., Riegraf, C., Jacob, S., & Friesen, A. (2022). New insights on in vitro biotransformation of anticoagulant rodenticides in fish. Chemosphere, 294, 133727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133727
Riva, F., Zuccato, E., Davoli, E., Fattore, E., & Castiglioni, S. (2019). Risk assessment of a mixture of emerging contaminants in surface water in a highly urbanized area in Italy. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 361, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.07.099
Saavedra, L. M., & Duchowicz, P. R. (2021). Predicting zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo developmental toxicity through a non-conformational QSAR approach. Science of the Total Environment, 796, 148820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148820
Sanabria, P., Scunderlick, D., Wilde, M. L., Ludtke, D. S., & Sirtori, C. (2021). Solar photo-Fenton treatment of the anti-cancer drug anastrozole in different aqueous matrices at near-neutral pH: Transformation products identification, pathways proposal, and in silico (Q)SAR risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142300
Sharif, A., Ashraf, M., Anjum, A. A., Javeed, A., Altaf, I., Akhtar, M. F., Abbas, M., Akhtar, B., & Saleem, A. (2016). Pharmaceutical wastewater being composite mixture of environmental pollutants may be associated with mutagenicity and genotoxicity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(3), 2813–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5478-3
Sharifi, A., Ahmadi, M., & Ala, A. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence and digital style on industry and energy post-COVID-19 pandemic. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 28(34), 46964–46984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15292-5
Spînu, N., Cronin, M. T. D., Lao, J., Bal-Price, A., Campia, I., Enoch, S. J., Madden, J. C., Mora Lagares, L., Novič, M., Pamies, D., Scholz, S., Villeneuve, D. L., & Worth, A. P. (2022). Probabilistic modelling of developmental neurotoxicity based on a simplified adverse outcome pathway network. Computational Toxicology, 21, 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100206
Thomas, P. C., Bicherel, P., & Bauer, F. J. (2018). How in silico and QSAR approaches can increase confidence in environmental hazard and risk assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 15(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4108
Tung, C. W., Lin, Y. H., & Wang, S. S. (2019). Transfer learning for predicting human skin sensitizers. Archives of Toxicology, 93(4), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-019-02420-x
Wang, J., Li, S., Zhu, Y., Guo, J., Liu, J., & He, B. (2021). Targeted eco-pharmacovigilance as an optimized management strategy for adverse effects of pharmaceuticals in the environment. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 82, 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2020.103565
Wielens Becker, R., Ibanez, M., Cuervo Lumbaque, E., Wilde, M. L., Flores Da Rosa, T., Hernandez, F., & Sirtori, C. (2020). Investigation of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites in Brazilian hospital wastewater by LC-QTOF MS screening combined with a preliminary exposure and in silico risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 699, 134218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134218
Wishart, D. S., Feunang, Y. D., Guo, A. C., Lo, E. J., Marcu, A., Grant, J. R., Sajed, T., Johnson, D., Li, C., Sayeeda, Z., Assempour, N., Iynkkaran, I., Liu, Y., Maciejewski, A., Gale, N., Wilson, A., Chin, L., Cummings, R., Le, D., et al. (2018). DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D1074–D1082. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1037
Xu, M., Yang, H., Liu, G., Tang, Y., & Li, W. (2022). In silico prediction of chemical aquatic toxicity by multiple machine learning and deep learning approaches. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 42(11), 1766–1776. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4354
Zhang, H., Liu, C. T., Mao, J., Shen, C., Xie, R. L., & Mu, B. (2020). Development of novel in silico prediction model for drug-induced ototoxicity by using naive Bayes classifier approach. Toxicology In Vitro, 65, 104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104812
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71974153), Humanities and Social Science Foundation from Hubei Provincial Department of Education (No.22D025) and the Provincial University Students' Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Program in Hubei (No. S202310488166).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.G.: literature search, data analysis, and drafting. J.Z.: literature search, data analysis, and drafting. X.C.: data analysis, drafting and editing. J.W.: conceptualization, supervision, and critical review.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors agree with publishing.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, J., Zhao, J., Chen, X. et al. A review on in silico prediction of the environmental risks posed by pharmaceutical emerging contaminants. Environ Monit Assess 195, 1535 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12159-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12159-9