Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural resource management relies on identifying the ecological constraints, assessing land suitability, and considering the socio-economic demands in the region. However, in many developing countries, natural resources are extensively overused in favor of economic growth. This is due to the fact that conservation and natural constraints are not always taken into consideration during the planning phase, especially when the decision-making process is mainly influenced by political or economical views. To avoid these subjective plannings, environmental planners are encouraged to consider quantitative planning approaches that can integrate environmental, social, economic, and political matters through a non-bias procedure. The present study, therefore, examines the application of three multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM), namely, analytic hierarchical process (AHP), fuzzy analytic hierarchical process (fuzzy AHP), and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), for the assessment of land suitability afforestation. Siahpoosh Watershed, in Iran, is used as a case study to compare three MCDM methods. To achieve this, a set of land suitability criteria (i.e., slope, elevation, aspect, soil texture, soil depth, drainage, erosion, temperature, rainfall, and vegetation type and cover) was defined and weighted using the AHP and fuzzy AHP methods. TOPSIS was then used to prioritize and rank the suitability of different sections of the study area for afforestation. The study demonstrates that the fuzzy AHP method combined with TOPSIS generates more reliable outcomes than the AHP method. The results could be useful for making more informed decisions about afforestation in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  • Alavi, I., & Alinejad-Rokny, H. (2011). Comparison of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods for plant species selection (case study: Reclamation plan of sungun Copper Mine; Iran). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1104–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemi, A., Eslami, A., & Shataee Joibari, S. (2014). Investigation on development potential of endangered species of Taxus baccata at Golestan province, based on GIS technology (case study: Pooneh Aram reserve). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 21(4), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.22092/IJFPR.2014.5141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir Amadi, A., & Mozaffari, H. (2012). Analysis of appropriate zones for ecotourism development in Zanjan province using GIS. Geographical Researches Quarterly Journal, 27(3), 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiraslani, F., & Dragovich, D. (2011). Combating desertification in Iran over the last 50 years: An overview of changing approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiri, M. J., Jalali, S. G., Salman Mahini, A., Hossaini, S. M., & Azari Dehkordi, F. (2009). Ecological potential evaluation of Dohezar and Sehezar watersheds in north of Iran using GIS. Environmetal Studies, 50(35), 33–44. https://doi.net/20.1001.1.10258620.1388.35.51.7.9. Accessed 3 June 2022.

  • Babaei, S. (2006). Environmental evaluation for forest land classification by using of GIS (case study in Kazem-rood watershed north of Iran). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12(1), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Quan, Q., Zhang, K., & Wei, J. (2021). Spatiotemporal characteristics and attribution of dry/wet conditions in the Weihe River Basin within a typical monsoon transition zone of East Asia over the recent 547 years. Environmental Modelling & Software, 143, 105116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, T. C. (2002). Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 20(11), 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700200227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dengiz, O., Gol, C., Sariolu, F. E., & Edi, S. (2010). Parametric approach to land evaluation for forest plantation: A methodological study using GIS model. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(12), 1482–1496. https://doi.org/10.5072/ZENODO.36366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doggart, N., Morgan-Brown, T., Lyimo, E., Mbilinyi, B., Meshack, C. K., Sallu, S. M., & Spracklen, D. V. (2020). Agriculture is the main driver of deforestation in Tanzania. Environmental Research Letters, 15(3), 034028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6b35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazlollahi Mohammadi, M., Soleimani, A., Ezati, S., & Sepahvand, A. (2014). Selection of the most suitable species in order to forestation in southern Zagros forests using AHP & TOPSIS techniques. Ecology of Iranian Forest, 2(4), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh, A., Bagherzadeh, A., & Keshavarzi, A. (2020). Model application in evaluating land suitability for OAK and PINE forest plantations in northeast of Iran. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 4(3), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2019.1633217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R., Luther, J. E., Devillers, R., & Eddy, B. (2010). An approach to GIS-based multiple criteria decision analysis that integrates exploration and evaluation phases: Case study in a forest-dominated landscape. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(12), 2102–2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajjarian, M., Hosseinzadeh, O., & Khalledi, F. (2016). Using combined MADM approach for Hyrcanian forests management. Environmental Sciences, 14(3), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamzeh, S., Mokarram, M., & Alavipanah, S. K. (2014). Combination of fuzzy and AHP methods to assess land suitability for barley: Case study of semi arid lands in the southwest of Iran. Desert, 19(2), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.22059/jdesert.2014.52346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, S. F., Hojjati, S. M., Jalilvand, H., & Hosseini Nasr, S. M. (2014). Assessment of successfulness of tree plantations based on multiple criteria in north of Iran. ECOPERSIA, 2(1), 485–497. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23222700.2014.2.1.7.4. Accessed 3 June 2022.

  • He, G., Liu, X., & Cui, Z. (2021). Achieving global food security by focusing on nitrogen efficiency potentials and local production. Global Food Security, 29, 100536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinzadeh, J. (2007). Evaluation of ecological potential of 48 Glendrood basin (Pimood series - Kadir Sar) using GIS (p. 50). Master Thesis in Forestry, Islamic Azad University, Chalous Branch, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resource.

  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications: A state-of-the-art survey (p. 186259). Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9

  • Kaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1991). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and application. Van Nostrand Reinhold. https://doi.org/10.2307/2008199

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiasari, S. M., Sagheb-Talebi, K., Rahmani, R., Adeli, E., Jafari, B., & Jafarzadeh, H. (2010). Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of plantations and natural forest at Darabkola, east of Mazandaran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 18(3), 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. F. (2010). An application of fuzzy AHP for evaluating course website quality. Computers & Education, 54(4), 877–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., He, X., Chan, F. T., & Wang, Z. (2022a). An extended multi-criteria group decision-making method with psychological factors and bidirectional influence relation for emergency medical supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 202, 117414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Zhang, J., Niu, B., Liu, L., & He, X. (2022b). A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making approach with intuitionistic fuzzy sets to design reverse supply chains for COVID-19 medical waste recycling channels. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 108228.

  • Liu, Y., Zhang, K., Li, Z., Liu, Z., Wang, J., & Huang, P. (2020). A hybrid runoff generation modelling framework based on spatial combination of three runoff generation schemes for semi-humid and semi-arid watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loi, N. K., & Tuan, V. M. (2008). Integration of GIS and AHP techniques for land use suitability analysis in Di Linch district – Upstream Dong Nai watershed – Vietnam Fortrop II Internatioanl Conference Tropical Forestry Change in a Changing World (pp. 17–20). Kasetsart University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mafi-Gholami, D., Jaafari, A., Zenner, E. K., Kamari, A. N., & Bui, D. T. (2020). Vulnerability of coastal communities to climate change: Thirty-year trend analysis and prospective prediction for the coastal regions of the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Science of the Total Environment, 741, 140305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mafi-Gholami, D., Zenner, E. K., Jaafari, A., Bakhtyari, H. R. R., & Bui, D. T. (2019). Multi-hazards vulnerability assessment of southern coasts of Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 252, 109628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majnoniyan, H. (2000). Iran’s protected areas. Foundations and measures to protect the park and regions (p. 216). Environmental Protection Agency, Tehran.

  • Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley and Sons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski, J. (2004). GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning, 62, 3–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, M. I., & Bhat, M. S. (2015). Sustainability of tourism development in Kashmir—Is paradise lost? Tourism Management Perspectives, 16, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, M. F., Najafi, A., & Ahmadlo, F. (2015). Using the analytical network process (ANP) based on BOCR model to select the most suitable region for forestation with almond species. Nusantara Bioscience, 7(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n070210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, Z., & Limaei, S. M. (2018). Multiple criteria decision-making approaches for forest sustainability (case study: Iranian Caspian Forests). Forest Research, Forestry Research and Engineering International Journal, 2(2): 114–120. https://doi.org/10.15406/freij.2018.02.00035

  • Moradzadeh, F., & Babaei kafaki, S., & Mataji. A. (2011). Assessing the ecological potential of afforestation using geographic information system (GIS) (case study: Dadabad region in Lorestan province). Journal Renewable Natural Resources Research, 2(4), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ownegh, M., Ghanghermeh, A., & Abedi, G. (2006). Land use management plan for southeastern coasts of the Caspian Sea: (Introduction a numerical model for ecological potential assessment and land use planning). Agricultural Natural Resource Sciences, 13(15), 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patawaran, N., Darsono, T.A., Wayangkau, I., & Mangngenre, S. (2019). Determining the location of rubber plantation locations in Merauke district based on AHP Topsis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 343, The 1st International Conference of Interdisciplinary Research on Green Environmental Approach for Sustainable Development (ICROEST) 2019 3–4 August 2019, Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton, Indonesia.

  • Paul, R., & Banerjee, K. (2021). Deforestation and forest fragmentation in the highlands of Eastern Ghats, India. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(3), 1127–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phua, M. H., & Minowa, M. (2005). A GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach to forest conservation planning at a landscape scale: A case study in the Kinabalu Area, Sabah. Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(2–4), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piran, H., Maleknia, R., Akbari, H., Soosani, J., & Karami, O. (2013). Site selection for local forest park using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system (case study: Badreh County). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 6(7), 930–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quan, Q., Liang, W., Yan, D., & Lei, J. (2022). Influences of joint action of natural and social factors on atmospheric process of hydrological cycle in Inner Mongolia. China. Urban Climate, 41, 101043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahdari, V., Sofyanian, A. R., Pourmanafi, S., & Maleki, S. (2019). Assessment of land forestry capability using multi criteria evaluation and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method. Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research, 17(1), 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi, V., Porkhabaz, H. R., Aghdar, H., & Mohammad, & Yari, F. (2015). Comparison of fuzzy AHP Buckley model and ANP in forestry capacity assessment (case study: Behbahan suburb). Iranian of Journal Applield Ecology, 4(13), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijae.4.13.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahimizadeh, N., Babai Kafaki, S., & Mataji, A. (2012). Determine the appropriate species for afforesting according to ecological capability of southern rage Alborz using GIS (Darakeh-Velenjak Shemiran Watershed). Journal of Science and Technology of Natural Resources, 7(1), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, M., & Jamshidi Zanjani, A. (2017). Landfill site selection using combination of fuzzy logic and multi criteria decision making method (Case Study: Arak Iran). Modares Civil Engineering Journal, 17(2), 120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. Planning Priority Setting Resource Allocation (pp. 287). New York, McGraw-Hill, Suffolk.

  • Sabir, M., Ali, Y., Khan, I., & Salman, A. (2020). Plants species selection for afforestation: A case study of the billion tree tsunami project of Pakistan. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2020

  • Shamseh, M. (2010). Evaluation of ecological potential for afforestation using GIS geographical information system in Qaleh Gol watershed and Khorramabad city (pp. 78). Master Thesis in Forestry Faculty of Natural Resources University of Guilan.

  • Szulecka, J., & Zalazar, E. M. (2017). Forest plantations in Paraguay: Historical developments and a critical diagnosis in a SWOT-AHP framework. Land Use Policy, 60(1), 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ülengin, B., Ülengin, F., & Güvenç, Ü. (2001). A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: The case of Istanbul. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(2), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00047-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatani, L., Hosseini, S. M., Raeini Sarjaz, M., Alavi, S. J., Shamsi, S. S., & Zohd Ghodsi, M. J. (2019). Effect of tree species on albedo in Iranian temperate forests: Comparing conifers and broadleaf trees in two seasons. Journal of Solar Energy Research, 4(3), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.22059/jser.2019.289156.1128

  • Xie, W., Nie, W., Saffari, P., Robledo, L. F., Descote, P. Y., & Jian, W. (2021). Landslide hazard assessment based on Bayesian optimization–Support vector machine in Nanping City. China. Natural Hazards, 109(1), 931–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zare, R., Babaei, K. S., & Mataji, A. R. (2011). Suggestion the appropriate species for afforestation in south hillside of Alborz mountain by using GIS (case study: Dareh Vesieh Watershed). Renewable Natural Resources Research, 2(1), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., Ali, A., Antonarakis, A., Moghaddam, M., Saatchi, S., Tabatabaeenejad, A., ... & Moorcroft, P. (2019a). The sensitivity of North American terrestrial carbon fluxes to spatial and temporal variation in soil moisture: An analysis using radar-derived estimates of root-zone soil moisture. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 124(11), 3208 3231.

  • Zhang, K., Wang, S., Bao, H., & Zhao, X. (2019b). Characteristics and influencing factors of rainfall-induced landslide and debris flow hazards in Shaanxi province, China. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 19(1), 93–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Xia, H., Pan, L., Song, H., Niu, W., Wang, R., ... & Qin, Y. (2021). Drought monitoring over Yellow River basin from 2003–2019 using reconstructed MODIS land surface temperature in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing, 13(18), 3748.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors of the paper have actively contributed to the scientific study reported in the paper and to the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farahnaz Rashidi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashidi, F., Sharifian, S. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment. Environ Monit Assess 194, 657 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10259-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10259-6

Keywords

Navigation