Skip to main content

Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Rule Based System-Integrated Methodology for Urban Land Use Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intelligence Systems in Environmental Management: Theory and Applications

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 113))

Abstract

While the specific constraints may vary over time and by location, urban planners essentially execute the same function, namely to create effective urban areas subject to the constraints of land, resources, finance and time. Thereby, it should be emphasized that planned urban forms cannot be excluded from organic growth processes. Land-use planning is regarded as a branch of urban planning including various disciplines which aims at providing land-use in an efficient and ethical way, thus preventing land-use conflicts. A crucial stage in land-use planning is the suitability analysis, which is the central part of land-use evaluation. Modern planning theories lead to approaches that consider all stakeholders with a variety of discourse values to avoid political and manipulative decisions. In recent years, application of quantitative approaches such as multi-criteria decision making techniques (MCDM) in land suitability procedures has increased. However, it is generally impossible to provide a land-use allocation satisfying each land-use goal simultaneously. Among MCDM techniques, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) , allowing subjective judgments in a consistent way, has the ability of including the criteria of land-use planning in a structured way. In addition, fuzzy rule based systems (FRBS) can be regarded as an appropriate method to capture and represent vague, imprecise and uncertain data in urban land-use planning. In this context, this chapter proposes an AHP-FRBS integrated methodology with the aim of assessing urban land-use suitability. The proposed methodology is applied on a selected area in Turkey. Finally, scenario analysis is performed so as to evaluate different scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akimoto, F. (2009). The birth of “land-use planning” in American urban planning. Planning Perspectives, 24, 457–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos, K., & Vavatsikos, A. (2012). Site suitability analysis for natural systems for wastewater treatment with spatial fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baffour Awuah, K. G., Hammond, F. N., Lamond, J. E., & Booth, C. (2014). Benefits of urban land-use planning in Ghana. Geoforum, 51, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos, G. D., Gaki-Papanastassiou, K., Skilodimou, H. D., Skianis, G. A., & Chousianitis, K. G. (2013). Assessment of rural community and agricultural development using geomorphological–geological factors and GIS in the Trikala prefecture (Central Greece). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27, 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. L., & Muir, B. R. (2011). Environmental and land-use planning approaches of indigenous groups in Canada: An overview. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(4), 421–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botta, A., Lazzerini, B., & Marcelloni, F. (2008). Context adaptation of Mamdani fuzzy rule based systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23, 397–418.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Busscher, T., Tillema, T., & Arts, J. (2013). Revisiting a programmatic planning approach: managing linkages between trans-port and land-use planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(4), 492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cengiz, T., & Akbulak, C. (2009). Application of analytical hierarchy process and geographic information systems in land-use suitability evaluation: A case study of Dümrek village (Çanakkale, Turkey). International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 16(4), 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandio, I. A., Matori, A.-N., Lawal, D. U., & Sabri, S. (2011). GIS-based land suitability analysis using AHP for public parks planning in Larkana city. Modern Applied Science, 5(4), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordon, O., Herrera, F., Hoffmann, F., & Magdalena, L. (2001). Genetic fuzzy systems: Evolutionary tuning and learning of fuzzy knowledge bases. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, F., Lee, C., & Zhang, X. (2001). GIS-based geo-environmental evaluation for urban land-use planning: A case study. Engineering Geology, 61(2001), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, L., Zhao, X., He, H.S., Deng, H., Yu, D., Zhou, L., & Wu, S. (2008). Evaluating land-use suitability of an industrial city in northeast China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(4), 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, Y., Luo, X., Dong, L., Wu, C., Liang, H., & Ren, J. (2016). An empirical study on transit-oriented low-carbon urban land use planning: Exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) on Shanghai, China. Habitat International, 53, 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duhl, L. J., & Sanchez, A. K. (1999). Healthy cities and the city planning process. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, J., Yi, H., & Liu, J. (2016). Urban green space recreational service assessment and management: A conceptual model based on the service generation process. Ecological Economics, 124, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann. (1976). Mapping for urban land-use planning in Southeast Queensland—a first approach. Bulletin of the International Associatiion of Engineering Geology 14, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Q., Liu, Y., Li, M., Mao, K., Li, F., Chen, Z., et al. (2012). Thematic maps for county-level land-use planning in contemporary China. Journal of Maps, 8(2), 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerin, F., Thériault, M., & Musy, A. (2001). Using GIS and outranking multi criteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(2), 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker, E. (2013). Legal requirements for risk and vulnerability assessments in Norwegian land-use planning. Local Environment, 20(4), 474–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaffashi, S., & Yavari, M. (2011). Land-use planning of Minoo Island, Iran, towards sustainable land-use management. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 18(4), 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S., Post, W., Wang, D., Nichols, J., Bandaru, V., & West, T. (2013). Hierarchical marginal land assessment for land-use planning. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keirstead, J., & Shah, N. (2013). The changing role of optimization in urban planning. In A. Chinchuluun, et al. (Eds.), Optimization, simulation, and control. Springer Optimization and Its Applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kergosien, E., Laval, B., Roche, M., & Teisseire, M. (2014). Are opinions expressed in land-use planning documents? International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(4), 739–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili-Damghani, K., Aminzadeh-Goharrizi, B., Rastegar, S., & Aminzadeh-Goharrizi, B. (2014). Solving land-use suitability analysis and planning problem by a hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(12), 2390–2416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa, D., & Privitera, R. (2013). Characterization of non-urbanized areas for land-use planning of agricultural and green infrastructure in urban contexts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, E. H., & Assilian, S. (1975). An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(1), 1–13.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. R., Johnson, M. L., Lilieholm, R. J., & Cronand, C. S. (2014). Development of a stakeholder-driven spatial modeling framework for strategic landscape planning using Bayesian networks across two urban-rural gradients in Maine, USA. Ecological Modelling, 291, 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015). Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, J., Parapar, J., Doallo, R., Rivera, F. F., Santé, I., & Crecente, R. (2013). High performance genetic algorithm for land-use planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 37, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourebrahim, S., Hadipour, M., & Bin Mokhtar, M. (2011). Integration of spatial suitability analysis for land-use planning in coastal areas; Case of Kuala Langat District, Selangor. Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(1), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Requena, I., Blanco, A., & Delgado, M. (2003). A constructive method for building fuzzy rule-based systems. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(2), 217–233.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riza, L. S., Bergmeir, C., Herrera, F., & Benitez, J. M. (2015). Fuzzy rule-based systems for classification and regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 65(6), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, T. J. (2010). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 741–755.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1988). The analytic hierarchy process-planning, priority setting, resource allocation (pp. 2–48). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1999). Basic theory of the analytic hierarchy process: How to make a decision. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exact. Fis. Nat., 93(4), 395–423.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Service Science, 1(1), 83–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L., & Shih, H.-S. (2009). Structures in decision making: On the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 1699, 867–872.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85–91.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 557–570.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sakieh, Y., Salmanmahiny, A., Jafarnezhad, J., Mehri, A., Kamyab, H., & Galdavi, S. (2015). Evaluating the strategy of decentralized urban land-use planning in a developing region. Land Use Policy, 48, 534–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santé-Riveira, I., Crecente-Maseda, R., & Miranda-Barrós, D. (2008). GIS-based planning support system for rural land-use allocation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 63, 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L. Y., Ochoa, J. J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The application of urban sustainability indicators: A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 51(1), 116–132.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Topcu, Y. I. (2004). A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey. Building and Environment, 39, 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, K. M., & Mansourian, A. (2016). evaluation of land suitability for urban land-use planning: Case study Dhaka City. Transactions in GIS, 20(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ustundag, A., Kilinc, M. S., & Cevikcan, E. (2010). Fuzzy rule based system for the economic analysis of RFID investments. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 5300–5306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ustundag, A., Kilinc, M. S., & Cevikcan, E. (2011). A hybrid fuzzy risk evaluation model for real estate investments. Journal of Multi-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 17, 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uy, P. D., & Nakagoshi, N. (2008). Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban greenspace planning in Hanoi, Vietnam. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Shen, Q., & Tang, B. (2015). GIS-Based framework for supporting land use planning in urban renewal: Case study in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3), 05014015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., Chen, Y., Wu, J., & Khan, S. (2011). Cellular automata-based spatial multi-criteria land suitability simulation for irrigated agriculture. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(1), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Chen, G. (2011). Application of improved GIS-based model to evaluate urban construction land suitability. Proceedings of SPIE, 7752, 77521G-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. (2015). An interval fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for sustainable urban land-use planning and land-use policy analysis. Land Use Policy, 42, 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziadat, F. M. (2007). Land suitability classification using different sources of information: Soil maps and predicted soil attributes in Jordan. Geoderma, 140(1–2), 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cigdem Kadaifci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kadaifci, C., Usta, S.K., Cevikcan, E. (2017). Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Rule Based System-Integrated Methodology for Urban Land Use Planning. In: Kahraman, C., Sari, İ. (eds) Intelligence Systems in Environmental Management: Theory and Applications. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 113. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42993-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42993-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42992-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42993-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics