Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating the spatiotemporal changes of land use/land cover and its implications for ecosystem services between 1972 and 2015 in Yuvacık

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to determine the spatiotemporal changes of land use/land cover and ecosystem services in a 12,092.1 ha of Yuvacık planning unit (PU), by focusing on carbon storage, soil loss, water production, biodiversity, and forest fire vulnerability. Stand type maps and forest management plans designed in 1972, 2004, and 2015 were used to reveal the changes over 43 years. The results pointed out obvious changes in terms of the occurrence of private and cadastral forests as new types of land use, disappearance of coppice and pure oak stands, and the transformation of 99% of open lands into residential areas. Furthermore, degraded forests decreased considerably and mixed forests rose sharply by 117.2%. The outputs were highly related to the increase by 42% (5194.9 ha) of dense forest and shifting of 2548 ha from thinner development stage to mature stages during the period. With respect to ecosystem services, carbon storage in forest ecosystems went up by 19.3 Gg over 43 years. Moreover, soil loss declined significantly from 1.1 billion tons year−1 to 108,549 tons year−1, and water production decreased considerably from 1.8 billion to 2.7 million m3 year−1. According to the Shannon evenness index, there was an increase by 0.3 and 0.2 successively. Biodiversity parameters such as tree density jumped from 18 to 46 ha−1 in thicker development classes (more than 36 cm dbh) and positive developments in biodiversity chain noticed. Afterward, Yuvacık PU was classed in 2nd class of high wildfire vulnerability due to range of fire sensitivity index (5.22–6.88).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from General Directorate of Forestry, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under permission for the current study, and so are not publicly available. The data, however, are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with the permission of General Directorate of Forestry (GDF).

References

  • Abdullah, M., Yousuf, A., Masrur, A., Adnan, M., Abdullah, A., Quezi, K., & Ashraf, D. (2019). Spatio-temporal patterns of land use/land cover change in the heterogeneous coastal region of Bangladesh between 1990 and 2017. Remote Sensing, 11(7), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abida, F., Mifta, ul. Sh., Harmeet, S., & Pervez, A. (2020). Assessment of spatiotemporal changes in land use/land cover of North Kashmir Himalayas from 1992 to 2018. (p. 1–13). Springer Nature Switzerland AG2020. 

  • ALTERFOR. (2018). Deliverable 1.2 – Alternative forest management models for ten case study areas in Europe, Alternatives models and robust decision-making for future forest management. (p. 72). EU Project No: 676754.

  • ALTERFOR. (2019). Deliverable 3.4 – Synthesis report: New FMMs in a landscape perspective: Innovation needs and gains in ES provisioning, Alternatives models and robust decision-making for future forest management. (p. 83). EU Project No: 676754.

  • Altun, L., Kezik, U., Kara, Ö., & Babur, E. (2016). Potential of water purification of Maçka forest ecosystems in northeastern Turkey. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 17(2), 557–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewket, W. (2002). Land covers dynamics since the 1950s in Chemoga watershed, Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Mountain Research and Development, 22, 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botequim, B., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Marques, S., Ricardo, A., Borges, J. G., Tomé, M., & Oliveira, M. M. (2013). Developing wildfire risk probability models for Eucalyptus globulus stands in Portugal. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6, 217–227.

  • Çakır, G., Ün, C., Başkent, E. Z., Köse, S., Sivrikaya, F., & Keleş, S. (2008). Evaluating urbanization, fragmentation and land use/land cover change pattern in İstanbul city, Turkey from 1971 to 2002. Land Degradation & Development, 663–775.

  • Cayuela, L., Rey Benayas, J. M., & Echeverria, C. (2006). Clearance and fragmentation of tropical montane forests in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico (1975–2000). Forest Ecology and Management, 226, 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., Eamus, D., Fölster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., Lescure, J. P., Nelson, B. W., Ogawa, H., Puig, H., Riera, B., & Yamakura, T. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145, 87–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B. (1996). Abundance, growth, and mortality of very large trees in a Neotropical lowland rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 80, 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezquerro, M., Pardos, M., & Diaz-Balteiro, L. (2016). Operational research techniques used for addressing biodiversity objectives into forest management: an overview. Forests, 7(10), 229.

  • FAO. (2015). Guide for Country Reporting for FRA 2015. The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Working Paper No: 184. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [online]. http://www.fao.org/3/a-au190e.pdf. Accessed 9 January 2020.

  • Franklin, J. F., Spies, T. A., Van, P. R., Carey, A. B., & Thornburgh, D. A. (2002). Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecology and Management, 155, 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., & Van Pelt, R. (2004). Spatial aspects of complexity in old-growth forests. Journal of Forestry, 102, 22–28. Global decline in large old trees.

  • Gamfeldt, L., Snall, T., Bagchi, R., Jonsson, M., Gustafsso, L., Kjellander, P., Ruiz-Jaen, M. C., Fröberg, M., Stendahl, J., Philipson, C. D., Mikusinski, G., Andersson, E., Westerlund, B., Andren, H., Moberg, F., Moe, J., & Bengtsson, J. (2013). Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications, 4, 1340. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Zubizarreta-Gerendiain, A., Ricardo, A., Marques, S., Botequim, B., Borges, J. G., Olıveıra, M. M., Tomé, M., & Pereıra, J.M.C. (2012). Modelling wildfire risk in pure and mixed forest stands in Portugal. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung (AFJZ) – German Journal for Forest Research, 183(11/12), 238–248.

  • Gautam, A. P., Webb, E. L., Shivakoti, G. P., & Zoebisch, M. A. (2003). Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 83–96.

  • GDF. (1972). Forest management plans of the Yuvacık planning units. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara. 1–5.

  • GDF. (2004). Forest management plan of the Yuvacık planning unit. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara. 252.

  • GDF. (2009). T.C. Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Forestry Statistics of Turkey Ankara. 94.

  • GDF. (2014a). Forest management and planning department. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara, publication No: 117. 1–21.

  • GDF. (2014b). Forest management guidelines (Principles of Designing Ecosystem Based Multi-objective Forest Management Plans, No: 299). General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara. 199.

  • GDF. (2015). Forest management plan of the Yuvacık planning unit. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara. 275.

  • GDF. (2022). Performance program for 2022. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara. 56.

  • González, J. R., Trasobares, A., Palahí, M., & Pukkala, T. (2007). Predicting tree survival in burned forests in Catalonia (North-East Spain) for strategic forest planning. Annals of Forest Science, 64, 733–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günlü, A., Kadıoğulları, A. I., Keleş, S., & Başkent, E. Z. (2009). Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to deforestation in northeastern Turkey: A case study in Rize. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 127–137.

  • IPCC. (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Program. In H. S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IGES. Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.

  • Kadioğulları, A. İ., Keleş, S., Başkent, E. Z., & Günlü, A. (2008). Spatiotemporal changes in landscape pattern in response to afforestation in northeastern Turkey: A case study of Torul. Scottish Geographical Journal, 259–273.

  • Karahalil, U. (2003). Modeling soil conservation and timber production values using linear programming (a case study in Karanlıkdere planning unit). Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Master Thesis, Trabzon. 84.

  • Karahalil, U. (2009). Preparing forest management plans for forested protected areas (a case study in Köprülü Canyon National Park). Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, PhD Thesis, Trabzon. 186.

  • Karahalil, U., Kadıoğulları, A., Başkent, E. Z., & Köse, S. (2007). Investigating spatial and temporal changes in Ballıbucak planning unit in Köprülü Canyon National Park using GIS. National Geographic Information System Congress, 30 October-2 November, Trabzon, Turkey.

  • Karahalil, U., Kadıoğulları, A. İ, & Bingöl, Ö. (2018a). The effects of continuous cover forestry on the outputs of various forest values in Gölcük planning unit, Landman 2018, Landscape Management: From Data to Decision, International IUFRO Conference, September 17–19. Check Republic.

  • Karahalil, U., Başkent, E. Z., & Bulut, S. (2018b). The effect of land cover changes on forest carbon storage in 40 years. Case study in Turkey. International Journal of Global Warming, 14, 1–16.

  • Keleş, S., & Başkent, E. Z. (2007). Modeling and analyzing timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: A case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 16(3), 473–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keleş, S., Sivrikaya, F., Çakır, G., & Başkent, E. Z. (2008). Spatial and temporal changes in forest cover in Turkey’s Artvin Forest, 1972–2002. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 17(4), 491–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezik, U. (2021). Investigation of total interception for pure spruce and fir ecosystems on ecological, hydrological and meteorological aspects in Eastern Black Sea region, Turkey. Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, PhD thesis, Trabzon. 221.

  • Khan, S. I. (2017). Exploring the spatiotemporal dynamics of gölcük planning unit over 43 years and implications of international conventions to management planning approach. Karadeniz Technical University, Master Thesis. 66.

  • Kılıç, B., & Karahalil, U. (2015). Ağaç Türü, Gelişim Çağı ve Kapalılıkta Meydana Gelen 40 Yıllık Değişimin İncelenmesi: Ovacık Orman İşletme Şefliği Örneği, TUFUAB VIII. Teknik Sempozyumu, Mayıs, Konya, Bildiriler Kitabı, I, 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küçük, Ö., & Sağlam, B. (2004). Orman Yangınları ve Hava Halleri. Gazi Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi. Kastamonu, 4(2), 220–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer, D., Laurance, W. F., & Franklin, J. F. (2012). Global decline in large old trees. Science, 338(6112), 1305–1306.

  • Lutz, J. A., Larson, A. J., Swanson, M. E., & Freund, J. A. (2012). Ecological importance of large-diameter trees in a temperate mixed-conifer forest. PLoS One, 7(5), e36131.

  • Malhi, Y., Wood, D., Baker, T. R., Wright, J., Phillips, O. L., Cochrane, T., Meir, P., Chave, J., Almeida, S., Arroyo, L., Higuchi, N., Killeen, T. J., Laurance, S. G., Laurance, W. F., Lewis, S. L., Monteagudo, A., Neill, D. A., Vargas, P. N., Pitman, N. C. A., … Vinceti, B. (2006). The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old-growth Amazonian forests. Global Change Biology, 12, 1107–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, S., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Borges, J. G., Botequim, B., Oliveira, M. M., Tomé, J., & Tomé, M. (2011). Developing post-fire Eucalyptus globulus Labill stand damage and tree mortality models for enhanced forest planning in Portugal. Silva Fennica, 45, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MD. (2018). Sustainable use of soil and water in agriculture, Special Commission Report, XIth Development Plan (2019–2023), Ankara. 75.

  • Mertol, E., Tuğrul, V., & Halil Barış, Ö. (2018). The analysis of the forest fires in Turkey with statistical quality control method. Universe Scientific Publishing. 1–12.

  • MFW. (2016). Türkiye orman varlığı 2016 (State of Turkish Forests), T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Orman Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları Ankara.

  • Özsoy, G., & Aksoy, E. (2015). Prediction of soil loss differences and sediment accumulation at the Nilufer creek watershed, Turkey, using multiyear satellite data in a GIS. Journal Geocarto İnternational, 30(8), 1–75.

  • Pavon, D., Ventura, M., Ribas, A., Serra, P., Sauri, D., & Breton, F. (2003). Land use change and socio-environmental conflict in the Alt Emporda` county (Catalonia, Spain). Journal of Arid Environments, 543–552.

  • Perhans, K., & Gustafsson, L. (2015). Biodiversity conservation in Swedish forests: Ways forward for a 30-year-old multi-scaled approach. Ambio, 39(2010), 546–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, S. (2017). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, R. S., Kaukinen, D., & Carry, A. P. (2012). Patch analyst and patch grid. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario.

  • Sağlam, B., & Bilgili, E. (2000). Fire occurrence in relation to weather conditions. IUFRO XXI World Congress.

  • Sauti, R. (2019). Investigating the spatiotemporal changes of land use /land cover and ecosystem services in three periods in Yuvacık. Karadeniz Technical University, Master Thesis. 64.

  • Saygın, S. D., Özcan, A. U., Basaran, M., Burhan, O. T., Dolarslan, M., Yılman, F. E., & Erpul, G. (2014). The combined RUSLE/SDR approach integrated with GIS and geostatistics to estimate annual sediment flux rates in the semi-arid catchment, Turkey. Environment and Earth Science, 71, 1605–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2565-y

  • Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623–656.

  • Simeonova, P. N., Brigitte, R., Jürgen, Z., & Brang, P. (2019). Tree species dynamics in Swiss forests as affected by site, stand and management. Stand Dynamics and Silviculture, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcher strasse111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland. 1–16.

  • Sivrikaya, F., Keleş, S., & Çakır, G. (2007). Spatial distribution and temporal change of carbon storage in timber biomass of two different forest management units. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132(1), 429–438.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L., Yuhuan, C., & Aiguo L. (2016). Spatiotemporal dynamic analysis of forest ecosystem services using “big data”: A case study of Anhui province, central-eastern China. School of Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China. 1–11.

  • Tolunay. (2011). Total carbon stocks and carbon accumulation in living tree biomass in forest ecosystems of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 35, 265–279.

  • Upadhyay, T. P., Sankhayan, P. L., & ve Solberg, B. (2005). A review of carbon sequestration dynamics in the Himalayan region as a function of land-use change and forest/soil degradation with special reference to Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment. 449–465.

  • URL-1. (2021). https://www.unccd.int/news-events/turkey-gets-results-combating-soil-erosion. 2th January, 2021.

  • Vacik, H., Borges, J. G., & Garcia-Gonzalo, J. (2015). Decision support for the provision of ecosystem services under climate change: An editorial. Forests, 6(9), 3212–3217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeel, A., Rao, K. S., Maikhuri, R. K., & Saxena, K. G. (2005). Forest management and land use/cover changes in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of Central Himalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 229–242.

  • Yuan, K., Li, F., Yang, H., & Wang, Y. (2019). The influence of land use change on ecosystem service value in Shangzhou District. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1321.1–13.

  • Zeng, Y., Zhong, L., & Wang, L. E. (2018). Spatiotemporal changes in recreation potential of ecosystem services in Sanjiangyuan, China. Journal of Spatial Science, 63, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, H., García-Gonzalo, J., Peltola, H., & Kellomäkı, S. (2010). The effects of forest structure on the risk of wind damage at a landscape level in a boreal forest ecosystem. Annals of Forest Science, 67(1).

  • Zengin, H., Yeşil, A., Asan, Ü., Bettinger, P., Cieszewski, C., & Siry J. P. (2013). Evolution of modern forest management planning in the Republic of Turkey. Journal of Forestry, 111(4), 239–248. 1–10.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to highly thank the General Director of Forestry (GDF) for giving the opportunity to access all the data including cartographic maps and forest management plans, which were used in this study, and all the foresters who have contributed to make these data available for researchers. The authors would also like to thank the proofreading center of Karadeniz Technical University and the anonymous reviewers for their critical comments which have greatly helped us in raising the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission. The main results for the manuscript are from the master thesis of corresponding author Raymond Sauti (2019), finished under the supervision of the second author Uzay Karahalil.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond SAUTI.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

I confirm that all authors of the manuscript have no conflict of interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SAUTI, R., KARAHALİL, U. Investigating the spatiotemporal changes of land use/land cover and its implications for ecosystem services between 1972 and 2015 in Yuvacık. Environ Monit Assess 194, 311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09912-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09912-x

Keywords

Navigation