Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of urban trees in reducing airborne particulate matter by dry deposition in Tehran, Iran

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deposition of atmospheric pollution as particulate matter (PM) has become a serious issue in many urban areas. This study measured and estimated the amount of atmospheric PM deposition onto oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees located in Tehran Megapolis, Iran. PM deposited on the leaves of urban trees during spring and summer was estimated using leaf wash measurements. In addition to direct measurements, the dry deposition velocity and the yearly whole-tree PM deposition were estimated using both field measurements and a theoretical model of deposition flux. We estimated air quality improvement as a result of the trees at respiratory height (1.5 m), tree height (10 m), and boundary layer height (1719 m). Foliar PM deposition during spring and summer was estimated to average 0.05 g/leaf and 41.39 g/tree using direct measurements. The annual PM deposited on the leaves, trunk, and branches of an average urban tree was calculated to be 78.60 g/tree. Trees were estimated to improve air quality at 1.5 m, 10 m, and 1719 m from ground level by 25.8%, 5.8%, and 0.1%, respectively. Hence, oriental plane trees substantially reduce PM at respiratory height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files). Moreover, the raw datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the University of Tehran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Seyed Mahdi Heshmatol Vaezin, Mohammad Moftakhar Juybari, and Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi; Methodology: Seyed Mahdi Heshmatol Vaezin and Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi; Formal analysis: Seyed Mahdi Heshmatol Vaezin and Mohammad Moftakhar Juybari; Investigation: Arash Daei and Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi; Data curation: Arash Daei and Mohammad Moftakhar Juybari; Writing—original draft preparation: Seyed Mahdi Heshmatol Vaezin, Mohammad Moftakhar Juybari, Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi, and Thomas Grant Pypker; Writing—review and editing: Mohammad Moftakhar Juybari, Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi, and Thomas Grant Pypker; Project Administration: Seyed Mahdi Heshmatol Vaezin, Anoushirvan Shirvany, Matthew James Tallis, Satoshi Hirabayashi and Mazaher Moeinaddini. All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Moftakhar Juybari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Paraboloid outer surface area equation (S; m2) was used to calculate the outer or lateral area of tree’s trunk (Vcalc, 2018):

$$S=\pi {b}^{2}+\frac{\pi b}{{6h}^{2}}\left[{\left({b}^{2}+{4h}^{2}\right)}^\frac{3}{2}-{b}^{3}\right]$$
(15)

where b and h are respectively the diameters (m) at the tree collar and the tree height.

Appendix 2

McGowan and Clark (2008) estimated the relationship between height and PM10 concentration in Queensland, Western Australia as below equation:

$$H=4.27e+05\times {e}^{\left(-0.089\times P{M}_{10}\right)}$$
(16)

The above equation was rewritten as follows:

$$P{{M}_{10}}_{\left({H}_{i}\right)}=\frac{Ln\left({H}_{i}\right)-12.96}{0.089}$$
(17)

In the next step, the integral of Eq. 17 was used to calculate the cumulative PM10 values (CPM10) in each height range (Hi) (Eq. 18). This equation was calculated for four height ranges (Hi) including the respiratory height (1.5 m), the average height of the tree (10 m), and the atmospheric boundary layer height (m).

$$CP{M}_{10}={\int }_{0}^{{H}_{i}}\frac{\mathit{ln}\left({H}_{i}\right)-12.96}{0.089}$$
(18)

The average value of PM10 in each height range was obtained by dividing the integral value (Eq. 18) by the corresponding height (Hi). Average PM10 concentration in each height range (Hi) of the study site was calculated (µg m−3) using the PM10 concentration (measured at standard pollution measurement height of 4 m that equal to 130.04 µg m−3) at the study site and the ratio between the average PM10 value in each height range and the PM10 concentration in McGown and Clark (2008).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heshmatol Vaezin, S.M., Juybari, M.M., Daei, A. et al. The effectiveness of urban trees in reducing airborne particulate matter by dry deposition in Tehran, Iran. Environ Monit Assess 193, 842 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09616-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09616-8

Keywords

Navigation