Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward a holistic environmental impact assessment of marble quarrying and processing: proposal of a novel easy-to-use IPAT-based method

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marble is a natural dimension stone that is widely used in building due to its resistance and esthetic qualities. Unfortunately, some concerns have arisen regarding its production process because quarrying and processing activities demand significant amounts of energy and greatly affect the environment. Further, performing an environmental analysis of a production process such as that of marble requires the consideration of many environmental aspects (e.g., noise, vibrations, dust and waste production, energy consumption). Unfortunately, the current impact accounting tools do not seem to be capable of considering all of the major aspects of the (marble) production process that may affect the environment and thus cannot provide a comprehensive and concise assessment of all environmental aspects associated with the marble production process. Therefore, innovative, easy, and reliable methods for evaluating its environmental impact are necessary, and they must be accessible for the non-technician. The present study intends to provide a contribution in this sense by proposing a reliable and easy-to-use evaluation method to assess the significance of the environmental impacts associated with the marble production process. In addition, an application of the method to an actual marble-producing company is presented to demonstrate its practicability. Because of its relative ease of use, the method presented here can also be used as a “self-assessment” tool for pursuing a virtuous environmental policy because it enables company owners to easily identify the segments of their production chain that most require environmental enhancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbulut, H., & Gurer, C. (2007). Use of aggregates produced from marble quarry waste in asphalt pavements. Building and Environment, 42, 1921–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akinwumi, I. I., & Booth, C. A. (2015). Experimental insights of using waste marble fines to modify the geotechnical properties of a lateritic soil. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 23(2), 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André, A., De Brito, J., Rosa, A., & Pedro, D. (2014). Durability performance of concrete incorporating coarse aggregates from marble industry waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 389–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bribian, I. Z., Capilla, A. V., & Uson, A. A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 46(5), 1133–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brizga, J., Feng, K., & Hubacek, K. (2013). Drivers of CO2 emissions in the former soviet union: a country level IPAT analysis from 1990 to 2010. Energy, 59, 743–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capitano, C., Traverso, M., Rizzo, G., Finkbeiner, M. (2011). Life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to marble products. Proceeding online LCM 2011.28-31th August, Berlin.

  • Capitano, C., Peri, G., & Rizzo, G. (2014). Is the eco-label EU decision for hard coverings really capable of capturing the environmental performances of the marble productive chain? A field verification by means of a life cycle approach. International Journal of LCA, 19(5), 1022–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Careddu, N., & Marras, G. (2015). Marble processing for future uses of CaCO3-microfine dust: a study on wearing out of tools and consumable materials in Stonewor. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review: An International Journal, 36(3), 183–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Careddu, N., & Siotto, G. (2011). Promoting ecological sustainable planning for natural stone quarrying. The case of the Orosei marble producing area in eastern Sardinia. Resources Policy, 36, 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Careddu, N., Siotto, G., Siotto, R., & Tilocca, C. (2013). From landfill to water, land and life: the creation of the Centre for stone materials aimed at secondary processing. Resources Policy, 38(3), 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chertow, M. R. (2001). The IPAT equation and its variants: changing views of technology and environmental impact (review). Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(4), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1972a). The environmental cost of economic growth. In R. G. Ridker (Ed.), Population, resources and the environment (pp. 339–363). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1972b). A bulletin dialogue on “the closing circle”: response. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientistis, 28(5), 17 .42–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Čuček, L., Klemeš, J. J., Varbanov, P. S., & Kravanja, Z. (2015). Significance of environmental footprints for evaluating sustainability and security of development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(8), 2125–2141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cucurachi, S., Heijung, R., & Ohlau, K. (2012). Towards a general framework for including noise impacts in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(4), 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Z., & Xiuli, L. (2013). Urban building energy consumption forecast based on the IPAT theory. Advanced Material Research, 689, 482–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1992). Population, sustainability, and earth’s carrying capacity. Bioscience, 42(10), 761–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, M., Gupta, S. D., Mukhopadhyay, R., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2016). Progress in rubber. Plastics and Recycling Technology, 32(2), 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhiraj, M., Poonam, M., & Suja, G. (2016). Utilization of marble waste powder as a novel adsorbent for removal of fluoride ions from aqueous solution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(1), 932–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, T., Rosa, E.A. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review Summer/Autumn 1.

  • Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009). Establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the community eco-label to hard coverings. Decision 607 of 9th July 2009. EN Official Journal of the European Union, 12 08 2009, L 208/21.

  • European Parliament and The Council (2010). DIRECTIVE 2010/75/EU of The European Parliament and of The Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (Recast). Official Journal of the European Union L 334/17, 17.12.2010.

  • Fabrica, A. (2006). Tesi di Laurea in Ingegneria per l’Ambiente ed il Territorio: “La gestione ambientale nel settore estrattivo: considerazioni relativo al ciclo lavorativo del marmo nel bacino di Custonaci” (in Italian).

  • Fang, K., Heijungs, R., & de Snoo, G. R. (2014). Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecological Indicators, 36, 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Amann, C. (2001). Beyond IPAT and Kuznets curves: globalisation as a vital factor in analysing the environmental impact of socio-economic metabolism. Population and Environment, 23(1), 7–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galetakis, M., & Soultana, A. (2016). A review on the utilization of quarry and ornamental stone industry fine by products in the construction sector. Construction and Building Materials, 102, 769–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, A., Wiedmann, T., Ercin, E., Knoblauch, D., Ewing, B., & Giljum, S. (2012). Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecological Indicators, 16, 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galli, A., Wackernagel, M., Iha, K., & Lazarus, E. (2014). Ecological footprint: implications for biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 173, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazi, A., Skevis, G., & Founti, M. A. (2012). Energy efficiency and environmental assessment of a typical marble quarry and processing plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, 32, 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girod, B., Van Vuuren, D. P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2013). Global climate targets and future consumption level: an evaluation of the required GHG intensity. Environmental Research Letters, 8(1), 1–10. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network. (2009). Ecological footprint standards 2009. Oakland: Global Footprint Network Available at www.footprintstandards.org. Accessed 27 Aug 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Mercado, F., de Haro Lozano, S., Delgado Fernández, I. C., & Simón-Torres, M. (2015). Using marble sludge increases the success of dump deposit restoration under Mediterranean climate. Ecological Engineering, 84, 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, B., Wang, R., Yao, L., Liu, H., & Wang, Z. (2015). Life cycle assessment of ceramic façade material and its comparative analysis with three other common façade materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 86–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanieh, A. A., AbdElall, S., & Hasan, A. (2014). Sustainable development of stone and marble sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 581–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, J. P., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1974). Human population and the global environment. American Scientists, 62, 282–292. http://www.odyssee-mure.eu/publications/br/energy-efficiency-in-buildings.html Accessed 27 August 2016.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IMMCARRARA (Internazionale Marmi e Macchine Carrara S.p.A). (2016). Stone sector 2016—Bilancio e prospettive del commercio internazionale dei prodotti lapidei—Annual Report and Outlook for the International Stone Sector. Edited by: Manuela Gusson. http://www.stat.immcarrara.com/uploads/files/1072it-stone-sector-2016-1.pdf Accessed 27 Aug 2016 (Italian).

  • ISO (International Organization of standardization) (2004). ISO 14001:2004 environmental management systems—requirements with guidance for use.

  • ISO (International Organization of standardization) (2006). ISO 14040: 2006 environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework.

  • ISO (International Organization of standardization) (2013). ISO/TS 14067: 2013 greenhouse gases—carbon footprint of products—requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication.

  • ISO (International Organization of standardization) (2014). ISO 14046: 2014 environmental management—water footprint—principles, requirements and guidelines.

  • Italian Goverment (1993). Legislative decree no. 275 of the 12th July 1993. Riordino in materia di concessione di acque pubbliche. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 182 del 5 agosto 1993 (in Italian).

  • Italian Government (1959). Decree No. 128 of 9th of April 1959. Norme di polizia delle miniere e delle cave. Gazzetta Ufficiale n.87 del 11 aprile—Supplemento Ordinario n. 870 (in Italian).

  • Italian Government (2006). Legislative decree no. 152 of 3rd of April 2006. Norme in materia ambientale. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 88 del 14 aprile—Supplemento Ordinario n. 96 (in Italian).

  • Kloepffer, W. (2008). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. International Journal of LCA, 13(2), 89–95 http://link.springer.com/journal/11367/13/2/page/1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Gennusa, M., Raimondi, C., Rizzo, G., Traverso, M. (2006). Environmental impact of marble mining: the case study of a Sicilian marble quarry. Proceedings of SETAC Europe—13th LCA Case Studies Symposium. Stuttgart, Germany, 7th -8th December.

  • Lee, B., Trcka, M., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2011). Embodied energy of building materials and green building rating systems—a case study for industrial halls. Sustainable Cities and Society, 1(2), 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liguori, V., Rizzo, G., & Traverso, M. (2008). Marble quarrying: an energy and waste intensive activity in the production of building materials. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. doi:10.2495/EEIA080201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J., Manuel, F., Capitano, C., Peri, G., Josa, A., Rieradevall, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2014). Environmental management of granite slab production from an industrial ecology standpoint. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micali, G. (1990). Il comparto dei materiali lapidei di pregio in Sicilia. L’industria mineraria, 6, 13–18 (in Italian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., & Deumling, D. (2004). Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy, 21, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montani, C. (2016). XXVII Report 2016—Marble and stones in the world. Edited by Aldus Casa di Edizioni, Carrara.

  • Nicoletti, G. M., Notarnicola, B., & Tassielli, G. (2002). Comparative life cycle assessment of flooring materials: ceramic versus marble tiles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ODYSSEE and MURE (2015). Energy efficiency trends and policies in the household and tertiary sectors an analysis based on the ODYSSEE and MURE Databases, June 2015.

  • Ozcelik, M. (2016). Environmental pollution and its effect on water sources from marble quarries in western Turkey. Environmental Earth Science, 75, 796. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5627-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozyonar, F., & Karagozoglu, B. (2012). Systematic assessment of electrocoagulation for the treatment of marble processing wastewater. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 9(4), 637–646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peri, G., & Rizzo, G. (2012). The overall classification of residential buildings: possible role of tourist EU Ecolabel award scheme. Building and Environment, 56, 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo, A., Becerra, R., & Tibaquira, G. J. E. (2016). Energetic and carbon footprint analysis in manufacturing process of bamboo boards in Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 563–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talakonukula, R., Ravi, P., & Karunesh Kumar, S. (2013). Life cycle energy analysis of a multifamily residential house: a case study in Indian context. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency, 2013(2), 34–41. doi:10.4236/ojee.2013.21006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tozsin, G., Arol, A. I., Oztas, T., & Kalkan, E. (2014). Using marble wastes as a soil amendment for acidic soil neutralization. Journal of Environmental Management., 133, 374–377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso, M., Rizzo, G., & Finkbeiner, M. (2010). Environmental performance of building materials: life cycle assessment of a typical Sicilian marble. International Journal of LCA, 15(1), 104–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatarama Reddy, B. V. (2009). Sustainable materials for low carbon buildings. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 4(3), 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vjestica, S., Budak, I., Kljajin, M., Vukelic, D., Milanovic, B., Milankovic, D., & Hodolic, J. (2014). Model for analysis of environmental impacts of production processes in flooring industry based on LCA. Tehnički vjesnik, 21(3), 457–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Lewan, L., & Borgström Hansson, C. (1999). Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint. Ambio, 28, 604–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner, P. E., & Ausubel, J. H. (2002). A framework for sustainability science: a renovated IPAT identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 99(12), 7860–7865.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economy, 46(3), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksek, Í. (2015). The evaluation of building materials in terms of energy efficiency. Periodica Polytechnic Civil Engineering, 59(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni, A. (2012). Life cycle sustainability assessment. International Journal of LCA, 17(4), 373–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Energia, Ingegneria dell’Informazione e Modelli Matematici, Scuola Politecnica dell’Università degli Studi di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Building 9, 90128, Palermo, Italy

    Cinzia Capitano, Giorgia Peri, Gianfranco Rizzo & Patrizia Ferrante

Authors
  1. Cinzia Capitano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giorgia Peri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gianfranco Rizzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrizia Ferrante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgia Peri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capitano, C., Peri, G., Rizzo, G. et al. Toward a holistic environmental impact assessment of marble quarrying and processing: proposal of a novel easy-to-use IPAT-based method. Environ Monit Assess 189, 108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5825-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5825-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation