Abstract
Forest inventory data often consists of measurements taken on field plots as well as values predicted from statistical models, e.g., tree biomass. Many of these models only include fixed-effects parameters either because at the time the models were established, mixed-effects model theory had not yet been thoroughly developed or the use of mixed models was deemed unnecessary or too complex. Over the last two decades, considerable research has been conducted on the use of mixed models in forestry, such that mixed models and their applications are generally well understood. However, most of these assessments have focused on static validation data, and mixed model applications in the context of continuous forest inventories have not been evaluated. In comparison to fixed-effects models, the results of this study showed that mixed models can provide considerable reductions in prediction bias and variance for the population and also for subpopulations therein. However, the random effects resulting from the initial model fit deteriorated rapidly over time, such that some field data is needed to effectively recalibrate the random effects for each inventory cycle. Thus, implementation of mixed models requires ongoing maintenance to reap the benefits of improved predictive behavior. Forest inventory managers must determine if this gain in predictive power outweighs the additional effort needed to employ mixed models in a temporal framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Counties are administrative subdivisions of states having the primary purpose of providing local governance. The study area (Pennsylvania) has 67 counties ranging in area from 337 to 3182 km2 (mean = 1730 km2).
References
Adame, P., del Río, M., & Cañellas, I. (2008). A mixed nonlinear height–diameter model for pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.). Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 88–98.
Bechtold, W. A. (2003). Crown-diameter prediction models for 87 species of stand-grown trees in the eastern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 27, 269–278.
Bechtold, W. A., & Scott, C. T. (2005). The forest inventory and analysis plot design. In W. A. Bechtold, & P. L. Patterson (Eds.). The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program – national sampling design and estimation procedures (pp. 27–42). General Technical Report SRS-80. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Southern Research Station.
Castedo-Dorado, F., Diéguez-Aranda, U., Barrio Anta, M., Sánchez Rodríguez, M., & von Gadow, K. (2006). A generalized height–diameter model including random components for radiata pine plantations in northwestern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 229, 202–213.
Coble, D. W., & Lee, Y.-J. (2011). A mixed-effects height‐diameter model for individual loblolly and slash pine trees in East Texas. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 35, 12–17.
Crecente-Campo, F., Tomé, M., Soares, P., & Diéguez-Aranda, U. (2010). A generalized nonlinear mixed-effects height-diameter model for Eucalyptus globulus L. in northwestern Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 943–952.
de-Miguel, S., Mehtätalo, L., & Durkaya, A. (2014). Developing generalized, calibratable, mixed-effects meta-models for large-scale biomass prediction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44, 648–656.
Feldpausch, T. R., Banin, L., Phillips, O. L., et al. (2011). Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences, 8, 1081–1106.
Gómez-García, E., Diéguez-Aranda, U., Castedo-Dorado, F., & Crecente-Campo, F. (2014). A comparison of model forms for the development of height–diameter relationships in even-aged stands. Forest Science, 60, 560–568.
Gregoire, T. G. (2012). Height-dbh bibliography: 1932 – present. http://environment.yale.edu/content/documents/00001660/Height-DBH.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2015.
Jayaraman, K., & Zakrzewski, W. T. (2001). Practical approaches to calibrating height–diameter relationships for natural sugar maple stands in Ontario. Forest Ecology and Management, 148, 169–177.
Jiang, L., & Li, Y. (2010). Application of nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach in tree height prediction. Journal of Computers, 5, 1575–1581.
Lappi, J. (1997). A longitudinal analysis of height/diameter curves. Forest Science, 43, 555–570.
Mehtätalo, L. (2004). A longitudinal height–diameter model for Norway spruce in Finland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 131–140.
Reams, G. A., Smith, W. D., Hansen, M. H., Bechtold, W. A., Roesch, F. A., & Moisen, G. G. (2005). The forest inventory and analysis sampling frame. In W. A. Bechtold & P. L. Patterson (Eds.). The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program – national sampling design and estimation procedures (pp. 11–26). General Technical Report SRS-80. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Southern Research Station.
Russell, M. B. (2015). Influence of prior distributions and random effects on count regression models: implications for estimating standing dead tree abundance. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 22, 145–160.
Schmidt, M., Kiviste, A., & von Gadow, K. (2011). A spatially explicit height–diameter model for Scots pine in Estonia. European Journal of Forest Research, 130, 303–315.
Temesgen, H., Monleon, V. J., & Hann, D. W. (2008). Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38, 553–565.
Trincado, G., & Burkhart, H. E. (2006). A generalized approach for modeling and localizing stem profile curves. Forest Science, 52, 670–682.
Trincado, G., VanderSchaaf, C. L., & Burkhart, H. E. (2007). Regional mixed-effects height–diameter models for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations. European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 253–262.
U.S. Forest Service. (2007). Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide, volume 1: field data collection procedures for phase 2 plots, version 4.0. http://socrates.lv-hrc.nevada.edu/fia/dab/databandindex.html. Accessed 14 May 2015.
Vargas-Larreta, B., Castedo-Dorado, F., Álvarez-González, J. G., Barrio-Anta, M., & Cruz-Cobos, F. (2009). A generalized height-diameter model with random coefficients for uneven-aged stands in El Salto, Durango (Mexico). Forestry, 82, 445–462.
Vonesh, E. F., & Chinchilli, V. M. (1997). Linear and nonlinear models for the analysis of repeated measurements. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Vonesh, E. F., Chinchilli, V. M., & Pu, K. (1996). Goodness-of-fit in generalized nonlinear mixed-effects models. Biometrics, 52, 572–587.
Westfall, J. A. (2006). Predicting past and future diameter growth for trees in northeastern U.S. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36(6), 1551–1562.
Westfall, J. A. (2015). Spatial-scale considerations for a large area forest inventory regression model. Forestry, 88, 267–274.
Westfall, J. A., & Laustsen, K. M. (2006). A merchantable and total height model for tree species in Maine. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 23, 241–249.
Woodall, C. W., Heath, L. S., Domke, G. M., & Nichols, M. C. (2011). Methods and equations for estimating aboveground volume, biomass, and carbon for trees in the U.S. forest inventory, 2010. General Technical Report NRS-88. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
Zhang, L., & Gove, J. H. (2005). Spatial assessment of model errors from four regression techniques. Forest Science, 51, 334–346.
Zhang, L., & Shi, H. (2004). Local modeling of tree growth by geographically weighted regression. Forest Science, 50, 225–244.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Mahadev Sharma, Felipe Crecente-Campo, John Stanovick, Matt Russell and an anonymous reviewer for providing valuable comments that substantially improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Westfall, J.A. Strategies for the use of mixed-effects models in continuous forest inventories. Environ Monit Assess 188, 245 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5252-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5252-0