Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the primary and ready biodegradability of dianilinodithiophosphoric acid

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dianilinodithiophosphoric acid (DDA) is widely used as sulfide mineral flotation collector in China. It is necessary to investigate the biodegradability of DDA to provide the fundamental knowledge to assess the environmental fate in the risk assessment of DDA and to design and operate the DDA flotation wastewater biological treatment plant. In the present study, the primary and ready aerobic biodegradations of DDA were studied and the primary biodegradation kinetic model of DDA was developed. The results show that DDA displays a good primary biodegradability and its biodegradation ratio reaches 99.8 % in 7 days. In contrast, DDA is not easily ready biodegradable; hence, it is a partially biodegradable organic compound. The primary aerobic biodegradation kinetics can be described using the first-order reaction kinetics equation: C = 19.72191e−0.01513t.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Araujo, D. M., et al. (2010). Biodegradation studies on fatty amines used for reverse flotation of iron ore. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 64, 151–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. H., et al. (2010). Experimental study on the biodegradability of alkyl xanthate collectors. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 46, 351–357.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., et al. (2011a). Primary biodegradation of sulfide mineral flotation collectors. Minerals Engineering, 24, 953–955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. H., et al. (2011b). Evaluation of biodegradability of alkyl xanthates flotation collectors. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 42, 546–554.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Contrera, R. C., et al. (2014). First-order kinetics of landfill leachate treatment in a pilot-scale anaerobic sequence batch biofilm reactor. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 385–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deo, N., & Natarajan, K. A. (1998). Biological removal of some flotation collector reagents from aqueous solutions and mineral surfaces. Minerals Engineering, 11, 717–738.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., et al. (2012). Degradation and influence factors of ammonium butyl aerofloat in paddy soil. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 32, 1454–1458.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houot, R. (1982). Beneficiation of phosphatic ores through flotation: review of industrial applications and potential developments. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 9(4), 353–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. F. (1990). Flotation wastewater and tailing treatment. Beijing: The Chinese Society for Metals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. M., et al. (2009). Study on the environmental pollution and control of organic chemicals in the mine beneficiation. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 37, 5086–5087. 5116.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, N. O., & Bradshaw, D. J. (2010). The formulation and use of mixed collectors in sulphide flotation. Minerals Engineering, 23, 945–951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mei, C. F., et al. (2015). A comparative study of biodegradability of a carcinogenic aromatic amine (4,4′-diaminodiphenylmethane) with OECD 301 test methods. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 111, 123–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Momoh, O. L. Y., et al. (2013). Development of simplified anaerobic digestion models (SADM’s) for studying anaerobic biodegradability and kinetics of complex biomass. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 79, 84–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1992). Ready biodegradability. 301 B: CO 2 evolution (modified Sturm test). Pairs: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrazzani, R., et al. (2012). Biodegradability, toxicity and mutagenicity of detergents: integrated experimental evaluations. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 84, 274–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y., et al. (2005). Primary aerobic biodegradation of cationic and amphoteric surfactants. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 1, 55–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y., et al. (2006). Primary aerobic biodegradation of linear and oxo alcohol alkylpolyglucosides (APG). Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 9, 227–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reuschenbach, P., et al. (2003). A critical comparison of respirometric biodegradation tests based on OECD 301 and related test methods. Water Research, 37, 1571–1582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richterich, K., & Steber, J. (2001). The time-window-an inadequate criterion for the ready biodegradability assessment of technical surfactants. Chemosphere, 44, 1649–1654.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio, J., et al. (2002). Overview of flotation as a wastewater treatment technique. Minerals Engineering, 15, 139–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sathian, S., et al. (2014). Performance of SBR for the treatment of textile dye wastewater: optimization and kinetic studies. Alexandria Engineering Journal., 53, 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaohua, C., et al. (2011). Primary biodegradation of sulfide mineral flotation collectors. Minerals Engineering, 24, 953–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • She, Z., et al. (2012). Study on the aerobic biodegradability and degradation kinetics of 3-NP; 2,4-DNP and 2,6-DNP. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 241–242, 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S. Y., et al. (2001). Study on the sulphide ore flotation wastewater purification and recycling. Nonferroius Metals, 4, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swigert, J. P., et al. (2014). Aquatic hazard and biodegradability of light and middle atmospheric distillate petroleum streams. Chemosphere, 108, 1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei-feng, S., et al. (2012). Co-metabolism characteristics of aniline aerofloat with different substrates in flotation wastewater. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals., 22, 2090–2096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Q., et al. (2015). Assessing the toxicity and biodegradability of deep eutectic solvents. Chemosphere, 132, 63–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, G. Y., et al. (2002). Treatment and reuse of wastewater from a sulphide ore flotation plant. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering., 2, 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinping, P., et al. (2010). Research on lead-zinc sulfide ore dressing wastewater treatment and reuse technologies. Hunan Nonferrous Metals, 26(2), 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, H. Z., et al. (2010). Evaluation of biodegradability of amine collectors. Advanced Materials Research, 113–116, 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youquan, L., & Rongshang, L. (1994). Study on properties of aniline aerofloat. Mining and Metallurgy, 3, 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., et al. (2006). Aerobic biodegradation of alkylphenol ethoxylates. Bioresource Technology, 97, 2478–2480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Education Special Funds of the University Discipline Construction of Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2014KTSP022), Nature Science Foundation of Guangdong (2015A030303003), and Science and Technology project of Guangdong (2014B020216009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuiyu Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, W., Sun, S., Xu, P. et al. Evaluating the primary and ready biodegradability of dianilinodithiophosphoric acid. Environ Monit Assess 188, 232 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5242-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5242-2

Keywords

Navigation