Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential and limitations of linking biological monitoring data and restoration needs of urbanized waterways: a case study

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation of effective strategies to mitigate the impacts of urbanization on waterways represents a major global challenge. Monitoring data plays an important role in the formulation of these strategies. Using monitoring and historical data compiled from around an urban area (Baltimore, USA), this paper is an assessment of the potential and limitations of the use of fish assemblage monitoring data in watershed restoration. A discriminant analysis between assemblages from urban and reference sites was used to determine faunal components which have been reduced or eliminated from Baltimore area waterways. This analysis produced a strong discrimination between fish assemblages from urban and reference sites. Species primarily associated with reference sites varied taxonomically and ecologically, were generally classified as pollution intolerant, and were native. Species associated with urbanized sites were also native, varied taxonomically and ecologically, and were mixed in pollution tolerance. One factor linking most species associated with reference sites was spawning mode (lithophilic). Spawning habitat limitations may be the mechanism through which these species have been reduced in the urbanized faunas. While this presents a strong general hypothesis, information regarding the specific habitat requirements and responses to urbanization of these species is limited. This represents a limitation to producing effective restoration strategies based on exact goals and targets. Without these, determining the type and number of restoration activities required to restore ecological communities remains problematic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D. (2004). Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J. (2004). CAP: a FORTRAN computer program for canonical analysis of principal coordinates. New Zealand: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland. http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~mja/prog/CAP_UserNotes.pdf. Accessed 1/8/13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, M. B., & Meixler, M. S. (2008). A target fish community to guide river restoration. River Research and Applications, 24, 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish (2nd ed.). Washington DC: EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beechie, T. J., Sear, D. A., Olden, J. D., Pess, G. R., Buffington, J. M., Moir, H., Roni, P., & Pollock, M. M. (2010). Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience, 60, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, H. E., & Rabeni, C. F. (1987). Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environmental Biology of Fish, 18, 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. S., & Palmer, M. A. (2007). Restoring streams in an urban context. Freshwater Biology, 52, 738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. S., & Palmer, M. A. (2011). River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation. Ecological Applications, 21, 1926–1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankers, S., & Bain, M.B. (2010). Assessing the restoration needs of the San Francisco Estuary using a target fish community analysis. Unpubl. Honors Thesis. Cornell U., Ithaca, NY. 24 pp.

  • Booth, D. B., & Jackson, C. R. (1997). Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. Journal of the American Water Resource Association, 33, 1077–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R., Cuffney, T. F., Coles, J. F., Fitzpatrick, F., McMahon, G., Steuer, J., Bell, A. H., & May, J. T. (2009). Urban streams across the USA: lessons learned from studies in 9 metropolitan areas. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 28, 1051–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlander, K. D. (1969). Handbook of freshwater fishery biology (Vol. 1). Ames: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. E. (1980). Egg, larval and juvenile development of longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae, and river chub, Nocomis micropogon, with notes on their hybridization. Copeia, 469–478.

  • Findlay, S. J., & Taylor, M. P. (2006). Why rehabilitate urban river systems? Area, 38(3), 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foresman, T. W. (2003). The Baltimore-Washington Regional Collaboratory Land-Use History Research Program. http://biology.usgs.gov/luhna/hinzman.html. Accessed 12/28/12.

  • Fraker, M. E., Snodgrass, J. W., & Morgan, F. (2002). Differences in growth and maturation of blacknose dace (Rhinichthys atratulus) across an urban- rural gradient. Copeia, 2002, 1122–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R. M., & Simon, T. P. (1999). Toward a unified definition of guild structure for feeding ecology of North American fishes. In T. P. Simon (Ed.), Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities (pp. 123–202). Washington DC: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeley, J. R. (1929). Fishes in the Erie-Niagara watershed. A biological survey of the Erie-Niagara system. Suppl. to the 18th ann. rpt. of the NY State Conservation Dept. Albany: New York State Conservation Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groffman, P. M., Bain, D. J., Band, L. E., Belt, K. T., Brush, G. S., Grove, J. M., Pouyat, R. V., Yesilonis, I. C., & Zipperer, W. C. (2003). Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. (1983). Active capture techniques. In L. A. Nielsen & D. L. Johnson (Eds.), Fisheries techniques. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, B. S., Feminella, J. W., & Pan, S. (2005). Detection of biotic responses to urbanization using fish assemblages from small streams of western Georgia, USA. Urban Ecosystems, 8, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, R. J., Johnson, T. E., Overbeck, P. F., O’Donnell, T. K., Hession, W. C., & Sweeney, B. W. (2008). Effects of riparian vegetation and watershed urbanization on fishes in streams of the Mid-Atlantic Piedmont (USA). Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44, 724–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, W. A. (1983). Passive capture techniques. In L. A. Nielsen & D. L. Johnson (Eds.), Fisheries techniques. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M., & Oberdorff, T. (1999). Applications of IBI concepts and metrics to waters outside the United States and Canada. In T. P. Simon (Ed.), Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities (pp. 79–96). Washington DC: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. A. (1993). Multivariate analysis of benthic invertebrate communities: the implication of choosing particular data standardizations, measures of association, and ordination methods. Hydrobiologia, 268, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. E., & Burkhead, N. M. (1993). Freshwater fishes of Virginia. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. E. (1994). The benefit to some minnows of spawning in the nests of other species. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 40, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. E. (1999). The relationship of spawning mode to conservation of North American minnows (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 55, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. E., & Page, L. (1992). The evolution of complex reproductive strategies in North American minnows. In R. L. Mayden (Ed.), Systematics, historical ecology and North American fishes (pp. 600–621). Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. (1981). Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal, S. S., & Belt, K. T. (2012). The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosystems, 15, 409–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal, S. S., Likens, G. E., Jaworski, N. A., Pace, M. L., Sides, A. M., Seekell, D. A., Belt, K. T., Secor, D. T., & Wingate, R. L. (2010). Rising stream and river temperatures in the United States. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(9), 461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopman, D. S., & Smith, R. A. (1993). 20 years of the Clean Water Act. Environment, 35, 16–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G., & Stein, E. D. (2009). How effective has the Clean Water Act been at reducing pollutant mass emissions to the Southern California Bight over the last 35 years? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 154, 413–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKaye, K. R. (1981). Natural selection and the evolution of interspecific brood care in fishes. In Natural selection and social behaviour (pp. 173–183). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • MD Department of the Environment. (2009). Water quality analysis of eutrophication for the Jones Falls watershed in Baltimore City and Baltimore County, Maryland. http://www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/Jones%20Falls%20WQA_final(2).pdf. Accessed 1/8/13.

  • Meixler, M. S. (2011). Application of the target fish community model to an urban river system. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1138–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. J. (1964). Behavior and ecology of some North American cyprinid fishes. American Midland Naturalist, 72, 313–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. L., et al. (1988). Regional applications of an index of biotic integrity for use in water resource management. Fisheries, 13, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. P., & Cushman, S. F. (2005). Urbanization effects on stream fish assemblages in Maryland, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24, 643–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdy, E. O., Birdsong, R. S., & Musick, J. A. (1997). Fishes of Chesapeake Bay. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. C., Palmer, M. A., Pizzuto, J. E., Moglen, G. E., Angermeier, P. L., Hilderbrand, R. H., Dettinger, M., & Hayhoe, K. (2009). Forecasting the combined effects of urbanization and climate change on stream ecosystems: from impacts to management options. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. E., Bernhardt, E. S., Allan, J. D., Lake, P. S., Alexander, G., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S., Dahm, C. N., Follsted Shah, J., Galat, D. L., Loss, S. G., Goodwin, P., Hart, D. D., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Kondolf, G. M., Lave, R., Meyer, J. L., O’Donnell, T. K., Pagano, L., & Sudduth, E. (2005). Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 208–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasiewicz, P. (2008). Application of MesoHABSIM and target fish community approaches to restoration of the Quinebaug River, Connecticut and Massachusetts, USA. River Research and Applications, 24, 451–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peoples, B. K. (2010). Detection probabilities and local population demographics of fishes in urbanized and forested streams of the New River basin, Virginia. Unpubl. Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnical Institute, Blacksburg, VA. 102 pp.

  • Peoples, B. K., Tainer, M. B., & Frimpong, E. A. (2011). Bluehead chub nesting activity: a potential mechanism of population persistence in degraded stream habitats. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 90, 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S., et al. (2008). Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore ecosystem study. BioScience, 58, 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirhalla, D. E. (2004). Evaluating fish–habitat relationships for refining regional indexes of biotic integrity: development of a tolerance index of habitat degradation for Maryland stream fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 133, 144–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raney, E. C. (1940). The breeding behavior of the common shiner, Notropis cornutus (Mitchill). Zoologica, 26, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raney, E. C., & Lachner, E. A. (1946). Age, growth, and habits of the hog sucker, Hypentelium nigricans (LeSueur), in New York. American Midland Naturalist, 36, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashleigh, B., Barber, M. C., Cyterski, J., Johnston, M., Parmar, R., Mohamoud, Y. (2004). Population models for stream fish response to hydrological and habitat alteration: the CVI watershed tool. Report EPA/600/R-04/190.

  • Reighard, J. (1943). The breeding habits of the river chub, Nocomis micropogon (Cope). Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, 28, 397–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. E., Southerland, M. T., Chaillou, J. C., Kazyak, P. F., Stranko, S. A. (2000). Refinement and validation of a fish index of biotic integrity for Maryland streams. Report #CBWP-MANTA-EA-00. Annapolis, MD: Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

  • Sabaj, M. H., Maurakis, E. G., & Woolcott, W. S. (2000). Spawning behaviors in the bluehead chub Nocomis leptocephalus, central stoneroller Campostoma anomalum, and river chub Nocomis micropogon. American Midland Naturalist, 144, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. S., & Helfman, G. (2001). Native invasions, homogenization, and the mismeasure of integrity of fish assemblages. Fisheries, 26, 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, T. P. (1999). Assessment of Balon’s reproductive guilds with application to Midwestern North American freshwater fishes. In T. P. Simon (Ed.), Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities (pp. 97–122). Washington DC: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stranko, S. A., Hurd, M. K., & Klauda, R. J. (2005). Applying a large, statewide database to the assessment, stressor diagnosis, and restoration of stream fish communities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 108, 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranko, S. A., et al. (2010a). Maryland biological stream survey: sampling manual: field protocols. Report #CBWP-MANTA-EA-07–01. Annapolis, MD: Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

  • Stranko, S. A., Gresens, S. E., Klauda, R. J., Kilian, J. V., Ciccotto, P. J., Ashton, M. J., & Becker, A. J. (2010b). Differential effects of urbanization and non-natives on imperiled stream species. Northeastern Naturalist, 17, 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranko, S. A., Hildebrand, R. H., & Palmer, M. A. (2012). Comparing the fish and benthic macroinvertebrate diversity of restored urban streams to reference streams. Restoration Ecology, 20, 747–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, W. (1926). The history and development of Jones’ Falls in Baltimore. Unpubl. Thesis. http://www.archive.org/details/TheHistoryAndDevelopmentOfJonesFallsInBaltimoreWilburA.Street. Accessed 12/28/12.

  • Sudduth, E. B., Hassett, B. A., Cada, P., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011). Testing the field of dreams hypothesis: functional responses to urbanization and restoration in stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 21(6), 1972–1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violin, C. R., Cada, P., Sudduth, E. B., Hassett, B. A., Penrose, D. L., & Bernhardt, E. S. (2011). Effects of urbanization and urban stream restoration on the physical and biological structure of stream ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 21, 1932–1949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddle, T. J. (Ed.). (2001). PHABSIM for Windows: user’s manual and exercises. Fort Collins: U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P., II. (2005). The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24, 706–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, D. M., Roy, A. H., & Leigh, D. S. (2009). Environmental indicators of macroinvertebrate and fish assemblage integrity in urbanizing watersheds. Ecological Indicators, 9, 1222–1233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehling, M. A. (2001). Land use cover change from 1915 to 1999 in the Gwynns Falls watershed, Baltimore County, Maryland: creation of a suburban social ecology. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Ohio University.

  • Whiteway, S. L., Biron, P. M., Zimmermann, A., Venter, O., & Grant, J. W. A. (2010). Do in-stream restoration structures enhance salmonid abundance? A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 67, 831–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winans, R. (1872). The Jones Falls question: hygiene and sanitary matters. Baltimore: JP Des Forges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisenden, B. D., Unruh, A., Morantes, A., Bury, S., Curry, B., Driscoll, R., Hussein, M., & Markegard, S. (2009). Functional constraints on nest characteristics of pebble mounds of breeding male hornyhead chub Nocomis biguttatus. Journal of Fish Biology, 75, 1577–1585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. J., & Armitage, P. D. (1997). Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management, 21, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcott, W. S., & Maurakis, E. G. (1988). Pit- ridge nest construction and spawning behaviors of Semotilus lumbee and Semotilus thoreauianus. Proceedings of the Southeastern fisheries council, 18, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yingling, F. (1940). Fish found in Gwynns Falls. Bulletin of the Natural History Society of Maryland, 10, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Maryland DNR (Michael Kashiwagi) for collecting and providing high quality data, the city of Baltimore Water Quality Management Office (Ted Eucare) for access to an excellent data set and loaning equipment, Dan Baldwin and Melissa Appler (MD Department of Planning) for land use information, Blue Water Baltimore for logistical support in collecting, and Wolf Pecher (UB) and Vishal Lalwani (UB) for assisting in data collection. The author is indebted to Charlie Davis of the Natural History Society of Maryland for providing historical observations of the fish community of Gwynns Falls. This manuscript was substantially improved through the comments and suggestions of an anonymous reviewer. This research was funded in part by a University of Baltimore Renaissance Seed Scholarship grant. Some data included in this document were provided by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanley Kemp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemp, S. The potential and limitations of linking biological monitoring data and restoration needs of urbanized waterways: a case study. Environ Monit Assess 186, 3859–3873 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3663-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3663-3

Keywords

Navigation