Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph for a large watershed

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hill torrents cause a lot of environmental and property damage in Pakistan every year. Proper assessment of direct runoff in the form of hill torrents is essential for protection of environment, property, and human life. In this paper, direct surface runoff hydrograph (DSRH) was derived for a large catchment using the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph concept. The catchment with hill torrent flows in semi-arid region of Pakistan was selected for this study. It was divided into series of linear cascades and hydrologic parameters required for Nash’s conceptual model, and were estimated using geomorphology of the basin. Geomorphologic parameters were derived from satellite images of the basin and ERDAS and ArcGIS were used for data processing. Computer program was developed to systematically estimate the dynamic velocity, its related parameters by optimization and thereby to simulate the DSRH. The data regarding rainfall–runoff and satellite images were collected from Punjab Irrigation and Power Department, Pakistan. Model calibration and validation was made for 15 rainfall–runoff events. Ten events were used for calibration and five for validation. Model efficiency was found to be more than 90% and root mean square error to be about 5%. Impact of variation in model parameters (shape parameter and storage coefficient) on DSRH was investigated. For shape parameter, the number of linear cascades varied from 1 to 3 and it was found that the shaper parameter value of 3 produced the best DSRH. Various values of storage coefficient were used and it was observed that the value determined from geomorphology and the dynamic velocity produced the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, M. M. (2009). Investigation and application of new techniques in determination of runoff for various conditions of humid and arid catchments. PhD thesis, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan.

  • Ahmad, M. M., Ghumman, A. R., & Ahmad, S. (2009). Estimation of Clark's instantaneous unit hydrograph parameters and development of direct surface runoff hydrograph. Journal of Water Resources Management, 23, 2417–2435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M. M., Ghumman, A. R., Ahmad, S., & Hashmi, H. N. (2010). Estimation of a unique pair of Nash model parameters: An optimization approach. Journal of Water Resources Management, 24(12), 2971–2989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahremand, A., & De Smedt, F. (2008). Distributed hydrological modeling and sensitivity analysis in Torysa Watershed, Slovakia. Water Resources Management, 22(3), 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahremand, A., & De Smedt, F. (2010). Predictive analysis and simulation uncertainty of a distributed hydrological model. Water Resources Management, 24(12), 2869–2880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekele, E. G., & Knapp, H. V. (2010). Watershed modeling to assessing impacts of potential climate change on water supply availability. Water Resources Management, 24(13), 3299–3320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, N. R., Parida, B. P., & Nayak, A. T. (1997). Flood estimation for ungauged catchments using the GIUH. Journal of Hydrology for Engineering ASCE, 123(4), 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, S., Lee, K. T., Ho, J., Liu, X., Huang, E., & Yang, K. (2010). Analysis of runoff in ungauged mountain watersheds in Sichuan, China using kinematic-wave-based GIUH model. Journal of Mountain Science, 7(2), 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coskun, H. G., Alganci, U., Eris, E., Agıralioglu, N., Cigizoglu, H. K., Yilmaz, L., et al. (2010). Remote sensing and GIS innovation with hydrologic modelling for hydroelectric power plant (HPP) in poorly gauged basins. Journal of Water Resources Management, 24(14), 3757–3772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, D. L. E. H., Booij, M. J., Rientjes, T. H. M., & Krol, M. S. (2010). Catchment variability and parameter estimation in multi-objective regionalisation of a rainfall–runoff model. Journal of Water Resources Management, 24(14), 3961–3985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (1981). Practical optimization. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitayive morphology. Bulletin Geological Society of America, 56, 275–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, K. S., Singh, V. P., & Bhunya, P. K. (2006). Development of optimal and physically realizable unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrology for Engineering ASCE, 11(6), 612–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jena, S. K., & Tiwari, K. N. (2006). Modelling synthetic unit hydrograph parameter with geomorphologic parameters of watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 319, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Chaterrjee, C., Singh, R. D., Lohani, A. K., & Kumar, S. (2004). GIUH based Clark and Nash models for runoff estimation for an ungauged basin and their uncertainty analysis. International Journal of River Management, 2(4), 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linsley, R. K., Kohler, M. A., & Paulhus, J. L. H. (1982). Hydrology for engineers (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. E. (1957). The form of instantaneous unit hydrograph. International Association of Scienific Hydrologists. Publication No. 51, 546–557, IAHS, Gentbrugge, Belgium.

  • Nash, J. E. (1960). A unit hydrograph study with particular reference to British catchments. Proceeding of International Civil Engineering, 17, 249–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part-I: A discussion of principles. Journal for Hydrology, 10(3), 282–290. Proc.-Intl. Civ. Eng., 17, 249–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H. Q. (2008). Utilization of SRTM data for flood protection based on GIUH approach. Review Geographica Acadêmica, 2(2), 14–25. viii.2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbaan R. (2010). Spate Irrigation: Water harvesting and agricultural land development options in the NWFR of Pakistan, Proceeding of International Policy Workshop “Water Management and Land Rehabilitation, NW Frontier Region, Pakistan”, Islamabad, December 6–8, 2010

  • Ponce, V. M. (1989). Engineering hydrology principles and practices. NJ: Prin. Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, R. K., Upadhyay, A., Sarkar, S., Upadhyay, A. M., & Singh, V. P. (2009). GIUH based transfer function for Gomti River Basin of India. Journal of Spatial Hydrology, 9(2), 24–50. Fall 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, J. A. (2000). Prediction and modelling of flood hydrology and hydraulics, Chapter 11 of inland flood hazards: Human, riparian and aquatic communities Eds. Ellen Wohl; Cambridge University Press, 2000.

  • Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Devoto, G., & Valdes, J. B. (1979). Discharge response analysis and hydrologic similarity: The interrelation between the geomorphologic IUH and the storm characteristics. Water Resources Research, 15(6), 1435–1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, R. (1984). Nash model relation to Horton order ratios. Water Resources Research, 20(7), 914–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B., Chandranath, C., Narendra, S. R., Singh, R., & And, K. R. (2006). Flood estimation by GIUH-based Clark and Nash models. Journal of Hydrology for Enginering ASCE, 11(6), 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, A., Madramootoo, C. A., Enright, P., & Prasher, S. O. (2007). Evaluation of three unit hydrograph models to predict the surface runoff from a Canadian watershed. Journal of Water Resources Management, 21(7), 1127–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K. (2004). Simplified use of gamma-distribution/Nash model for runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology for Engineering ASCE, 9(3), 240–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P. K., Bhunya, P. K., Mishra, S. K., & Chaube, U. C. (2007). An extended hybrid model for synthetic unit hydrograph derivation. Journal of Hydrology, 336, 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William H. P., Brain P. F., Saul A. T., & Wiliam T. V., (1986). Minimization or maximization of functions. Numerical Recipes, The Art of Scientific Computing. p. 274–334.

  • Zelazinski J. (1986). Application of the geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph theory to development of forecasting models in Poland. Hydrol. Sci. Journal-des Sciences Hydrogiques, 31, 2, 6/1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul Razzaq Ghumman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghumman, A.R., Ahmad, M.M., Hashmi, H.N. et al. Development of geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph for a large watershed. Environ Monit Assess 184, 3153–3163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2179-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2179-3

Keywords

Navigation