Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of a Unique Pair of Nash Model Parameters: An Optimization Approach

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water resources planning and management requires hydrologic models to estimate runoff from a catchment. For catchments with limited data, the choice of model and identification of its parameters is very important for development of a direct runoff hydrograph. A method is presented to determine a unique pair of hydrologic parameters of the Nash Model, number of linear cascade (n) and storage coefficient (k), using optimization based on Downhill Simplex technique. In this study physical parameters of the catchment are derived from (SPOT) satellite imageries of the basin using ERDAS software. Four different objective functions of varying complexity are tested to find the best solution. Weighted root mean square error (RMSE) and Model Efficiency (Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient) are used to evaluate the model performance. Using the NASH model, a direct surface runoff hydrograph (DSRH) is developed. Kaha catchment is part of Indus river system and is located in the semi-arid region of Pakistan. This catchment is dominated by hill torrent flows and is used in this work to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method. Ten randomly selected rainfall-runoff events are used for calibration and five events are used for validation. Model results during validation are very promising with model efficiency exceeding 93% and error in peak discharge under 8%. The sensitivity of the Nash model output in response to variation in hydrologic parameters n and k is also investigated. When evaluating the hydrologic response of large catchments, model output is more sensitive to n as compared to k indicating that the runoff diffusion phenomenon is dominant compared to translation flow effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Ghumman R, Ahmad S (2009) Estimation of Clark’s instantaneous unit hydrograph parameters and development of direct surface runoff hydrograph. Water Resour Manage 23:2417–2435. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9388-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Wagdany AS, Rao AR (1997) Estimation of the velocity parameter of the geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Water Resour Manage 11:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardossy A (2007) Calibration of hydrologic model parameters for ungauged catchments. J Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blueman AG (2003) Elementary statistics: a brief version. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 476–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong SH (2007) Genetic algorithm based parameter estimation of Nash Model. J Water Resour Manage. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9208-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill PE, Murray W, Wright MH (1981) Practical optimization. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson G, Hashmi MA, VBB VIAK Sweden (1995) Conservation and development of land and water resources of upper Kaha hill torrent catchment. NESPAK, Lahore

    Google Scholar 

  • James LD, Burges SJ (1982) Selection, calibration and testing of hydrologic models: hydrologic modeling of small watersheds. In: Hann CT, Johnson HP, Brakensiek DL (eds) ASAE monograph. St. Joseph, Michigan, pp 437–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Katli L, Indrajeet C (2005) Sensitivity analysis, calibration and validation for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(5):1077–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MT, Blank D, Delleur JW (1972) A program for estimating runoff from Indiana watershed. Part II. Assembly of hydrologic and geomorphologic data for small watersheds in Indiana, Tech. rep. N0. 23, Purdue Univ. Wat. Res. Res. Center, Lafayette

  • Linsley RK, Kohler MA, Paulhus JLH (1982) Hydrology for engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel CB (1998) Unit hydrographs derived from the Nash model. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE (1958) The form of instantaneous unit hydrograph. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol 51:546–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part-I: a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil S, Bardossy A (2006) Regionalization of runoff coefficient and parameters of an event based Nash-cascade model for predictions in ungauged basins. Geophys Res Abstr 8:74

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso R (1984) Nash model relation to Horton order ratios. Water Resour Res 20(7):914–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo B, Chandarnath C, Narendra SR, Rajendra S, Rakesh K (2006) Flood estimation by GIUH based Clark and Nash models. J Hydrol Eng 11(6):515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano SE (1997) Hydrology for engineers, geologists and envirornmental professionals. HydroScience, Lexington, pp 263–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh PK, Bhunya PK, Mishra SK, Chaube UC (2007) An extended hybrid model for synthetic unit hydrograph derivation. J Hydrol 336:347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USACE (1986) Program description and user mannual for SSARR Model. USACE, Portland

  • USACE, Hydrologic Engineering Centre (HEC) (2000) HEC-HMS user’s manual. Davis, California. Available at http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/documentation/CPD-74B_2000Mar.pdf

  • Zelazinski J (1986) Application of the geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph theory to development of forecasting models in Poland. Hydrol Sci 31(2):263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajjad Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, M.M., Ghumman, A.R., Ahmad, S. et al. Estimation of a Unique Pair of Nash Model Parameters: An Optimization Approach. Water Resour Manage 24, 2971–2989 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9590-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9590-3

Keywords

Navigation