Abstract
Use of indifference curves, defined as functionality between development index and pollution load to evaluate environmental impact, is proposed. Existing Battelle environmental evaluation methodology is subjective in its approach. The use of indifference curves lends a more objective approach to environment assessment methodology. The extent of environmental damage we are prepared to accept, for a development, can be explained by Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept approach. The application of proposed approach has been demonstrated taking an example of Power plant set up in forest area. The curves clearly show that cost of EMP considering mitigation of ecological damage is higher than the EMP mitigating impacts of air and water pollution only. The example stresses the need for willingness to accept along with willingness to pay.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basili, M., Matteo, Di-M., & Ferrini, S. (2006). Analysing demand for environmental quality: A willingness to pay/accept study in the province of Siena (Italy). Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 26(3), 209–219. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2004.12.027.
Bradford, D., Schlieckert, R., & Shore, S. (2000). The Environmental Kuznets curve: Exploring a fresh specification. NBER Working Paper, No.8001.
Canter, L. W. (1977). Environmental impact assessment (pp. 209). New York: McGraw. Government of India Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) (2006). EIA notification. Delhi: Government of India Ministry of Environment and Forests.
Daly, H. E. (1991). Steady-state economics. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, xvi, 302, ill.
Ekins, P., (2000). Economic growth and environmental sustainability: The prospects for green growth. London/New York: Routledge.
Government of India Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) (2006). EIA notification. Delhi: Government of India Ministry of Environment and Forests.
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353–377.
Hartmana, R., & Kwonb, O.-S. (2005). Sustainable growth and the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 29(10), 1701–1736. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2004.10.001.
Holtz-Eakin, D., & Selden, T. M. (1995). Stoking the fires? Co2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 85–101.
Jain, R. K., et al. (1973). Environmental impact for army military programs. Interim Report, D-13/AD 771062. U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research laboratory (USACERL).
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147–162. doi:10.1006/jeem.1994.1031.
Weber, T. A. (2003). An exact relation between willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Economics Letters, 80(3), 311–315. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00119-8.
World Bank (1992). World development report 1992: Development and the environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, A., Ganguly, A. Indifference curves as a tool for environment impact assessment. Environ Monit Assess 160, 513–519 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0715-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0715-6