Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudinal response towards road traffic noise in the industrial town of Asansol, India

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The major objective of the investigation was to evaluate the road traffic noise and its likely impacts on the local community of Asansol city (West Bengal, India) by monitoring and modeling. The attitudinal response of local population due to existing vehicular noise is presented in the paper. Noise and Attitudinal Survey was conducted at 25 locations. A total of 869 individuals were surveyed. The relationship between traffic noise levels and annoyance was studied using correlation, linear and multiple linear regressions analysis. The average L dn value was 73.28 ± 8.51 dB(A) (55.1–87.3); The Traffic Noise Index (TNI) was 80.62 ± 15.88 dB(A) (49.4–115.8). The mean value of percent of population Highly Annoyed (%HA) due to road traffic noise was 26.50 ± 3.37 (19.44–33.2), whereas the mean dissatisfaction score (MDS) was 2.96 ± 0.90 (1.04–4.45). Annoyance modeling was also performed based on field data. It can be said that Noise values gives desirable annoyance predicting values in comparison to vehicular data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Dakhllah, A. N., & Jadaan, K. S. (2005). Attitudes of Jordanian population towards road traffic noise. International Journal of Applied Science & Engineering, 3(2), 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1983). Noise pollution survey in Bombay. Scavenger, 3(9).

  • Banerjee, D., & Chakraborty, S. K. (2005). Ambient noise quality around sensitive areas in asansol city, West Bengal, India. Indian Journal of Environment and Ecoplanning, 10(3), 907–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, D., & Chakraborty, S. K. (2006). Monthly variation in night time noise level in residential areas of Asansol City. Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, 48(1), 39–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, D., Santra, S. C., Mukherjee, A. L., Roy, B. M., & Das, P. (2002). Road traffic noise in Calcutta metropolis, India. Indian Journal of Environmental Health, 3(1), 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, D., Santra, S. C., & Roy, B. (1998). Survey of community annoyance due to traffic noise-exposure in Calcutta metropolis. Journal of Acoustic Society of India, 26(1), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPCB (2000). Ambient air quality in respect of noise. Schedule –part II, Sec-3(ii), CPCB, New Delhi.

  • CPCB (2001). Noise pollution regulation in India. New Delhi: CPCB.

  • CPCB (2001). Pollution control acts, rules and notifications issued thereunder. Central Pollution Control Board, India, PCLS/02/1992 (4th ed.).

  • Das, D. B., Arya, P., Bakre, P. P., Bhargava, A., & Gupta, A. B. (1999). Environmental noise: A psychological, physiological and ambient assessment at industrial, residential and commercial places of an urban area in Rajasthan. Indian Journal Environment Protection, 19(7), 481–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorai, A. K., Maith, S., & Pal, A. K. (2007). Development of path model in road traffic noise annoyance of Dhanbad township. Noise & Vibration Worldwide, 38(3), 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ising, H. 1., & Kruppa, B. (2004). Health effects caused by noise: Evidence in the literature from the past 25 years. Noise and Health, 6(22), 5–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korfali, S. I., & Massoud, M. (2003). Assessment of community noise problem in greater Beirut area, Lebanon. Environmental Monitoring & Assessment, 84(3), 2003–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, S., Dutta, N., & Sarin, S. M. (2000). Subjective reaction to road traffic noise of residents living in Delhi City. Pollution Research, 19(3), 353–356.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ouis, D. (2002). Annoyance caused by exposure to road traffic noise: an update. Noise & Health, 4(15), 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. R., & Rao, M. G. S. (1992). Community reaction to road traffic noise. Applied Acoustic, 37(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schomer, P. (2001). A white paper: Assessment of noise annoyance, vol. 217 (pp 359–6602). Champaign, IL: Schomer.

  • Singhal, S. P. (2005). Noise pollution and control strategy pp. 81–169. N.Delhi: Narosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobotová, L., Jurkovičová, J., Stefániková, Z., Ševčíková, L., & Ághová, L. (2002). Non-auditory health risks of road traffic noise and community noise annoyance.

  • Stansfeld, S., Gallacher, J., Babisch, W., & Shipley, M. (1996). Road traffic noise and psychiatric disorder: Prospective findings from the Caerphilly study. BMJ, 313, 266–267.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1997). The urban noise survey. Washington DC: US Environmental Protection Agency 550/9-77-100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Banerjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banerjee, D., Chakraborty, S.K., Bhattacharyya, S. et al. Attitudinal response towards road traffic noise in the industrial town of Asansol, India. Environ Monit Assess 151, 37–44 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0247-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0247-0

Keywords

Navigation