Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exposure assessment to road traffic noise levels and health effects in an arid urban area

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Road traffic noise exposures have been recognized as serious environmental health concerns, especially in most developing countries with arid climate conditions, rapid increase in vehicle population, and limited traffic management systems. The excessive noise exposure level is associated with increase in the incidence of cardiovascular diseases and anxiety, including annoyance. This study aimed at determining traffic noise levels in residential areas, including the assessment of its annoyance and health effects based on the people’s perception and reportage. To do so, field measurement and traffic noise modeling were carried out in six road points to estimate the current noise levels along various roads close to human inhabitants in Muscat Governorate, Sultanate of Oman. The detailed measured noise levels in urban residential areas across the selected roads showed that noise levels have exceeded the local and international threshold limits at all locations during the entire day. The high sound levels (48.0–56.3 dBA) were observed using the US Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model (TNM, version 2.5) results, which were in agreement with the observed (56.3–60.4 dBA) data. To assess health implication to residents through interviews (n = 208), annoyance at home was found to be little (32%), moderate (28%), and high (9%) in comparison with workplace settings of 42%, 43%, and 15%, respectively. Nineteen percent of the interviewees had difficulties in sleeping, while 19.8% experienced stress due to road traffic noise exposures. Moreover, a strong association (p < 0.05) was established between the use and objection of noise barriers. The study revealed high noise levels and the prevalence of annoyance and health effects among the exposed population. Therefore, immediate action is required to tackle the current noise levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul-Wahab SA, Fadlallah SO (2014) A study of the effects of vehicle emissions on the atmosphere of Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Atmos Environ 98:158–167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ajayi AB, Dosunmu OO (2002) Environmental hazards of importing used vehicles into Nigeria. Proceedings of International Symposium on Environmental Pollution Control and Waste Management, Tunisia, pp 521–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Harthy I (2006) Noise annoyance responses of students and teachers in different schools in Muscat City, Oman, Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA - 35th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering. INTER-NOISE 2006:4541–4550

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Harthy IH (2007) Aircraft noise levels survey and its effect on residents of Muscat City, Oman., In Turkish Acoustical Society - 36th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering, INTER-NOISE 2007 ISTANBUL, pp. 2781-2790

  • Al-Harthy I, Tamura A (1999) Sound environment evaluation and categorization of audible sounds—The first survey of human response to sound environment in Muscat City (Oman). J Acoustic Soc Jpn 20:353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali SA, Tamura A (2003) Road traffic noise levels, restrictions and annoyance in Greater Cairo, Egypt. Appl Acoust 64:815–823

    Google Scholar 

  • AlQdah KS (2013) Experimental investigation of noise pollution level emerged from the most common use car in Saudi Arabia. Energy Procedia 36:939–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shidi HK, Al-Reasi HA, Sulaiman H (2020) Heavy metals levels in road dust from Muscat, Oman: relationship with traffic volumes, and ecological and health risk assessments. Int J Environ Health Res 1-13

  • Amoatey P, Sulaiman H (2017) Options for greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for road transportation in Oman. Am J Clim Chang 06:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoatey P, Sulaiman H, Kwarteng A, Al-Reasi HA (2018) Above-ground carbon dynamics in different arid urban green spaces. Environ Earth Sci 77:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amoatey P, Omidvarborna H, Baawain MS, Al-Mamun A (2020) Evaluation of vehicular pollution levels using line source model for hot spots in Muscat. Oman, Environmental Science and Pollution Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascari E, Bianco F, Chetoni M, Fredianelli L, Licitra G, Cori L (2015) Assessment of the noise quality of schools rooms within the Gioconda Project, The 22nd international congress on sound and vibration, Italy, pp. 1-8

  • Babisch W, Beule B, Schust M, Kersten N, Ising H (2005) Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction. Epidemiology 16:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Moncayo L, Chávez M, Puyana V, Lucio-Naranjo J, Garzón C, Pavón-García I (2019) A cost-effective approach to the evaluation of traffic noise exposure in the city of Quito, Ecuador. Case Stud Transport Policy 7:128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink M, Schäffer B, Vienneau D, Foraster M, Pieren R, Eze IC, Cajochen C, Probst-Hensch N, Röösli M, Wunderli J-M (2019) A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise. Environ Int 125:277–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AL, Lam KC, Kamp IV (2015) Quantification of the exposure and effects of road traffic noise in a dense Asian city: a comparison with western cities. Environ Health 14:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Can A, Aumond P (2018) Estimation of road traffic noise emissions: the influence of speed and acceleration. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 58:155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Charabi Y, Abdul-Wahab S, Al-Rawas G, Al-Wardy M, Fadlallah S (2018) Investigating the impact of monsoon season on the dispersion of pollutants emitted from vehicles: a case study of Salalah City, Sultanate of Oman. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 59:108–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirrus Research (2019) MK:427 Noise Sensor. Cirrus Research PLC, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Danihelová A, Němec M, Gergeľ T, Gejdoš M, Gordanová J, Sčensný P (2019) Usage of recycled technical textiles as thermal insulation and an acoustic absorber. Sustainability 11:2968

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kluizenaar Y, Janssen SA, van Lenthe FJ, Miedema HM, Mackenbach JP (2009) Long-term road traffic noise exposure is associated with an increase in morning tiredness. J Acoustic Soc Am 126:626–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Di G, Liu X, Lin Q, Zheng Y, He L (2012) The relationship between urban combined traffic noise and annoyance: an investigation in Dalian, north of China. Sci Total Environ 432:189–194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Directorate General of Meteorology (2017) Historical data. Directorate General of Meteorology, Muscat, Oman. http://www.met.gov.om/opencms/export/sites/default/dgman/en/weather-chart/historical-data/, Accessed, 24/05/2019

  • Dreger S, Meyer N, Fromme H, Bolte G (2015) Environmental noise and incident mental health problems: a prospective cohort study among school children in Germany. Environ Res 143:49–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2014) Noise in Europe 2014. European Environment Agency, Denmark. .file:///C:/Users/patrickam/Downloads/EEA%2010-2014%20Noise%20in%20Europe%202014.pdf Accessed, 19/08/2019

  • Enoksson Wallas A, Eriksson C, Edstedt Bonamy A-K, Gruzieva O, Kull I, Ögren M, Pyko A, Sjöström M, Pershagen G (2019) Traffic noise and other determinants of blood pressure in adolescence. Int J Hyg Environ Health 222:824–830

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (2018) Population exposure to environmental noise. European Environment Agency, Denmark. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/exposure-to-and-annoyance-by-2/assessment-3, Accessed, 26/06/2019.

  • Eze IC, Foraster M, Schaffner E, Vienneau D, Héritier H, Pieren R, Thiesse L, Rudzik F, Rothe T, Pons M, Bettschart R, Schindler C, Cajochen C, Wunderli J-M, Brink M, Röösli M, Probst-Hensch N (2018) Transportation noise exposure, noise annoyance and respiratory health in adults: a repeated-measures study. Environ Int 121:741–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin M, Fruin S (2017) The role of traffic noise on the association between air pollution and children's lung function. Environ Res 157:153–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fredianelli L, Carpita S, Licitra G (2019a) A procedure for deriving wind turbine noise limits by taking into account annoyance. Sci Total Environ 648:728–736

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fredianelli L, Del Pizzo A, Licitra G (2019b) Recent developments in sonic crystals as barriers for road traffic noise mitigation. Environments 6:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Garg N, Maji S (2014) A critical review of principal traffic noise models: strategies and implications. Environ Impact Assess Rev 46:68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Gori P, Guattari C, Asdrubali F, de Lieto Vollaro R, Monti A, Ramaccia D, Bilotti F, Toscano A (2016) Sustainable acoustic metasurfaces for sound control. Sustainability 8:107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamad K, Ali Khalil M, Shanableh A (2017) Modeling roadway traffic noise in a hot climate using artificial neural networks. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 53:161–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones S, Tefe M, Appiah-Opoku S (2015) Incorporating stakeholder input into transport project selection – a step towards urban prosperity in developing countries? Habitat Int 45:20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2018) Transport policies, induced traffic and their influence on vehicle emissions in developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 121:264–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee EY, Jerrett M, Ross Z, Coogan PF, Seto EY (2014) Assessment of traffic-related noise in three cities in the United States. Environ Res 132:182–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lelieveld J, Proestos Y, Hadjinicolaou P, Tanarhte M, Tyrlis E, Zittis G (2016) Strongly increasing heat extremes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) in the 21st century. Clim Chang 137:245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Lercher P, Evans GW, Meis M (2003) Ambient noise and cognitive processes among primary schoolchildren. Environ Behav 35:725–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Licitra G, Fredianelli L, Petri D, Vigotti MA (2016) Annoyance evaluation due to overall railway noise and vibration in Pisa urban areas. Sci Total Environ 568:1315–1325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Licitra G, Moro A, Teti L, Del Pizzo A, Bianco F (2019) Modelling of acoustic ageing of rubberized pavements. Appl Acoust 146:237–245

    Google Scholar 

  • MECA (1994) Issuing regulations for noise pollution control in public environment ministry of environment and climatic affairs, Oman. https://meca.gov.om/en/files/decisions/Decisions5439201342.pdf , Accessed, 24/4/2019

  • Miedema HME, Oudshoorn CGM (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect 109:409–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohareb N, Maassarani S (2019) Assessment of street-level noise in three different urban settings in Tripoli. Urban Clim 29:100481

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscat Municipality (2011) Muscat area traffic study. Muscat, Oman, pp 1–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscat Municipality (2019) Open Data, Muscat, Oman. https://www.mm.gov.om/Page.aspx?PAID=122#OpenData&MID=128&Slide=True&MoID=72, Accessed, 23/09/2019

  • National Centre for Statistics and Information (2018) Statistical Yearbook 2018 : Issue 46. National Centre for Statistics and Information (NCSI), Oman. https://ncsi.gov.om/Elibrary/LibraryContentDoc/bar_Statistical%20Year%20Book%202018_a8b32d59-cdc9-4987-ba29-1e7ce78d5cca.pdf Accessed, 23/09/2019

  • Ögren M, Molnár P, Barregard L (2018) Road traffic noise abatement scenarios in Gothenburg 2015 – 2035. Environ Res 164:516–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Okokon EO, Yli-Tuomi T, Turunen AW, Tiittanen P, Juutilainen J, Lanki T (2018) Traffic noise, noise annoyance and psychotropic medication use. Environ Int 119:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Ow LF, Ghosh S (2017) Urban cities and road traffic noise: reduction through vegetation. Appl Acoust 120:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyedepo SO, Adeyemi GA, Fayomi OSI, Fagbemi OK, Solomon R, Adekeye T, Babalola OP, Akinyemi ML, Olawole OC, Joel ES, Nwanya SC (2019) Dataset on noise level measurement in Ota metropolis, Nigeria. Data Brief 22:762–770

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paiva KM, Cardoso MRA, Zannin PHT (2019) Exposure to road traffic noise: annoyance, perception and associated factors among Brazil's adult population. Sci Total Environ 650:978–986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pallas M-A, Bérengier M, Chatagnon R, Czuka M, Conter M, Muirhead M (2016) Towards a model for electric vehicle noise emission in the European prediction method CNOSSOS-EU. Appl Acoust 113:89–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Park SH, Lee PJ, Jeong JH (2018) Effects of noise sensitivity on psychophysiological responses to building noise. Build Environ 136:302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfretzschner J, Rodriguez RM (1999) Acoustic properties of rubber crumbs. Polym Test 18:81–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajé F, Tight M, Pope FD (2018) Traffic pollution: a search for solutions for a city like Nairobi. Cities 82:100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Recio A, Linares C, Banegas JR, Díaz J (2016) The short-term association of road traffic noise with cardiovascular, respiratory, and diabetes-related mortality. Environ Res 150:383–390

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Recio A, Linares C, Díaz J (2018) System dynamics for predicting the impact of traffic noise on cardiovascular mortality in Madrid. Environ Res 167:499–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seong JC, Park TH, Ko JH, Chang SI, Kim M, Holt JB, Mehdi MR (2011) Modeling of road traffic noise and estimated human exposure in Fulton County, Georgia, USA. Environ Int 37:1336–1341

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber C, Ragettli MS, Brink M, Olaniyan T, Baatjies R, Saucy A, Vienneau D, Probst-Hensch N, Dalvie MA, Röösli M (2018) Comparison of sensitivity and annoyance to road traffic and community noise between a South African and a Swiss population sample. Environ Pollut 241:1056–1062

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg F, Miranda L (2005) Local agenda 21, capacity building and the cities of Peru. Habitat Int 29:163–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezel MN, Sari D, Ozkurt N, Keskin SS (2019) Combined NOx and noise pollution from road traffic in Trabzon, Turkey. Sci Total Environ 696:134044

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tobías A, Recio A, Díaz J, Linares C (2015) Health impact assessment of traffic noise in Madrid (Spain). Environ Res 137:136–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Traoré S (2019) Residential location choice in a developing country: what matter? A choice experiment application in Burkina Faso. Forest Policy Econ 102:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2019) Goal 11: Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. United Nations. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/, Accessed 10/07/2019

  • US Federal Highway Administration (2017) Traffic Noise Model Version 2.5. US Federal Highway Administration, United States. .https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/traffic_noise_model/tnm_v25/ Accessed, 26/06/2019.

  • US Federal Highway Administration (2018) Noise measurement handbook - final report. US Federal Highway Administration, US. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/measurement/handbook.cfm#toc492990722, Accessed, 26/06/2019.

  • van Kempen E, Babisch W (2012) The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens 30:1075–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas A, Ekström S, Bergström A, Eriksson C, Gruzieva O, Sjöström M, Pyko A, Ögren M, Bottai M, Pershagen G (2019) Traffic noise exposure in relation to adverse birth outcomes and body mass between birth and adolescence. Environ Res 169:362–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2011) Burden of disease from environmental noise : quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. World Health Orgnisation Regional Office for Europe, Denmak, pp. 1-128. .https://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/e94888/en/, Accessed, 26/07/2019.

  • Zhong M, Bagheri E, Christie J (2012) Improving group assignment and AADT estimation accuracy of short-term traffic counts using historical seasonal patterns & Bayesian statistics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 43:607–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Zytoon AM (2016) Opportunities for environmental noise mapping in Saudi Arabia: a case of traffic noise annoyance in an urban area in Jeddah City. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13

Download references

Funding

This study was carried out through the support from Sultan Qaboos University under the Grant No. CR/ENG/CAED/16/04

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahad Said Baawain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Lotfi Aleya

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 28.1 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amoatey, P., Omidvarbona, H., Baawain, M.S. et al. Exposure assessment to road traffic noise levels and health effects in an arid urban area. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 35051–35064 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09785-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09785-y

Keywords

Navigation