Skip to main content

Integrated monitoring and assessment of soil restoration treatments in the Lake Tahoe Basin

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment volume 150, Article number: 365 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Revegetation and soil restoration efforts, often associated with erosion control measures on disturbed soils, are rarely monitored or otherwise evaluated in terms of improved hydrologic, much less, ecologic function and longer term sustainability. As in many watersheds, sediment is a key parameter of concern in the Tahoe Basin, particularly fine sediments less than about ten microns. Numerous erosion control measures deployed in the Basin during the past several decades have under-performed, or simply failed after a few years and new soil restoration methods of erosion control are under investigation. We outline a comprehensive, integrated field-based evaluation and assessment of the hydrologic function associated with these soil restoration methods with the hypothesis that restoration of sustainable function will result in longer term erosion control benefits than that currently achieved with more commonly used surface treatment methods (e.g. straw/mulch covers and hydroseeding). The monitoring includes cover-point and ocular assessments of plant cover, species type and diversity; soil sampling for nutrient status; rainfall simulation measurement of infiltration and runoff rates; cone penetrometer measurements of soil compaction and thickness of mulch layer depths. Through multi-year hydrologic and vegetation monitoring at ten sites and 120 plots, we illustrate the results obtained from the integrated monitoring program and describe how it might guide future restoration efforts and monitoring assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Archer, A. J. (2000). Achnatherum thurberianum. In Fire effects information system. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/.

  • Caltrans (2007). Monitoring and assessment of erosion control treatments in and around the Lake Tahoe Basin. Final Report. 211 p.

  • Chistopherson, J., Johnson, W. S. (2006) Turf and erosion control grasses for the Tahoe Basin. University of Nevada, Reno Cooperative Extension (available online).

  • Claassen, V., & Hogan, M. (2002). Soil nitrogen pools associated with revegetation of disturbed sites in the Lake Tahoe area. Restoration Ecology, 10(2), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claassen, V. P., & Zasoski, R. J. (1998). A comparison of plant available nutrients on decomposed granite cut slopes and adjacent natural soils. Land Degradation & Development, 9(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. (2003). Using process-oriented parameters to assess degradation. Ecological Management and Restoration 4: S79–S82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. L. (2006). Erosion Sediment Analysis of Disturbed Soils in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Soils & Biogeochemistry MS Thesis, UC Davis.

  • Elzinga, C. L., Salzer, D. W., Willoughby, J. W., & Gibbs, J. P. (2001). Monitoring plant and animal populations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fifield, J. S., & Malnor, L. K. (1990). Erosion control materials vs. a seimarid environment — What has been learned from three years of testing? Proc. Int’l Erosion Control Assoc. Conference XXI. pp. 233–248.

  • Fifield, J. S., Malnor, L. K., & Dezman, L. E. (1989). Effectiveness of erosion control products on steep slopes to control sediment and to establish dry land grasses. Proc. Int’l Erosion Control Assoc. Conference XX. 10 pages.

  • Fifield, J. S., Malnor, L. K., Richter, B., & Dezman, L. E. (1988). Field testing of erosion control products to control sediment and to establish dry land grass under arid conditions. Proc. Int’l Erosion Control Assoc. Conference XIX. 17 pages.

  • Foltz, R. B., & Copeland, N. S. (2008). Evaluating the efficacy of wood shreds for use in erosion mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management (in press).

  • Goldsmith, W. (2006). Soil strength reinforcement by plants. International Erosion Control Web Site: http://www.ieca.org/membersonly/resources/proceedings/2006/.

  • Grismer, M. E. (2007). Soil restoration and erosion control: Quantitative assessment in rangeland and forested areas. ASABE Transactions Soil & Water Centennial Collection, 50(5), 1619–1626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grismer, M. E., & Ellis, A. L. (2006). Sediment particle-size distributions in runoff from disturbed soils in the Lake Tahoe Basin. California Agriculture, 60(2), 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grismer, M. E., Ellis, A. L., & Fristensky, A. (2007). Runoff sediment particle-sizes associated with soil erosion in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Land Degradation & Development, 18, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grismer, M. E., & Hogan, M. P. (2004). Evaluation of revegetation/mulch erosion control using simulated rainfall in the Lake Tahoe Basin: 1. Method assessment. Land Degradation & Development, 13, 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grismer, M. E., & Hogan, M. P. (2005a). Evaluation of revegetation/mulch erosion control using simulated rainfall in the Lake Tahoe Basin: 2. Bare soil assessment. Land Degradation & Development, 16, 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grismer, M. E., & Hogan, M. P. (2005b). Evaluation of revegetation/mulch erosion control using simulated rainfall in the Lake Tahoe Basin: 3. Treatment assessment. Land Degradation & Development, 16, 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchett, B., Hogan, M. P., & Grismer, M. E. (2006). Mechanized mastication effects on soil compaction and runoff from forests in the Western Lake Tahoe Basin. California Agriculture, 60(2), 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M. (2003). Luther pass monitoring report: Plant and soil cover monitoring for evaluating sediment source control success in the Lake Tahoe Basin. South Lake Tahoe, CA: Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoro, J. A., Rogel, J. A., Querejeta, J., Diaz, E., & Castillo, V. (2000). Three hydro-seeding revegetation techniques for soil erosion control on anthropic steep slopes. Land Degradation & Development, 11, 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, J. R., & Grismer, M. E. (1997). Measurement of fracture mechanics parameters in silty-clay soils. Soil Science, 162(5), 309–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poulenard, J., Podwojewski, P., Janeau, J.-L., & Collinet, J. (2001). Runoff and soil erosion under rainfall simulation of Andisols from the Ecuadorian Paramo: effect of tillage and burning. Catena, 45, 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, B. Z. (1985). Reclamation in the intermountain rocky mountain region. In M. K. McCarter (Ed.), Design of non-impounding mine waste dumps (pp. 177–192). New York: American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, S., & Grismer, M. E. (2004). Evaluation of Water Quality Projects in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 90, 225–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A., Langendoen, E., Bingner, R., Wells, R., Heins, A., Jokay, N., et al. (2003). Lake Tahoe Basin framework implementation study: Sediment loadings and channel erosion. USDA-ARS, Channel and Watershed Processes Research Unit, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford. MI.

  • Tollefson, J. E. (2006). Bromus carinatus. In Fire effects information system. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Retrieved from http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/.

  • White, C. A., & Franks, A. L. (1978). Demonstration of erosion and sediment control technology: Lake Tahoe Region of CA. Municipal Environment Research Lab, Office of Research & Development. USEPA Demonstration Grant No. S803181, Cincinnati, OH.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of LAWR-Hydrology, UC Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA

    M. E. Grismer

  2. Integrated Environmental Restoration Services, Tahoe City, CA, USA

    C. Schnurrenberger, R. Arst & M. P. Hogan

Authors
  1. M. E. Grismer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Schnurrenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Arst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. P. Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Grismer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grismer, M.E., Schnurrenberger, C., Arst, R. et al. Integrated monitoring and assessment of soil restoration treatments in the Lake Tahoe Basin. Environ Monit Assess 150, 365 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0236-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0236-3

Keywords

  • Ecologic function
  • Erosion
  • Hydrologic function
  • Monitoring
  • Runoff
  • Soils