Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in Eastern Turkey: a case study in Gümüşhane

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recognition and understanding of landscape dynamics as a historical legacy of disturbances are necessary for sustainable management of forest ecosystems. This study analyzed spatial and temporal changes in land use and land cover patterns in a typical mountain watershed in the Gumushane district along the Northeastern part of Turkey. The area is investigated by comparing LANDSAT images from 1987 to 2000 and evaluated the temporal changes of spatial structure of forest conditions through spatial analysis of forest cover type maps from 1971 and 1987 using GIS and FRAGSTATS™.

The results show a general decreasing trend in area of natural land cover types including broadleaf and conifer forests as well as coppice between 1971 and 1987 (0.54%, respectively). In contrast, between 1987 and 2000 this natural land cover types show increasing trend (1.6%). In parallel with forest dynamics, the area of managed land including lowland and upland agricultural areas, rangelands and grasslands increased during the first period and decreased during second period. In terms of spatial configuration, Gümüşhane forests aren’t generally fragmented by intensive forest utilization in the latter periods. This is partially due to out-migration of rural population in Gümüşhane. Nevertheless, land use pattern significantly changed over time depending on a few factors such as unregulated management actions, social pressure and demographic movements. The study revealed that demographic movements have a major effect on landscape dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Başkent, E. Z., & Jordan, J. A. (1995a). Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes: A hierarchical approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25(11), 1830–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Başkent, E. Z., & Jordan, J. A. (1995b). Designing forest management to control spatial structure of landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 34, 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskent, E. Z, Jordan, G. A. & Nurullah, A. M. M. (2000). Designing Forest landscape (ecosystems) management. The Forestry Chronicle, 76(5), 739–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorndalen, J. E. (1992). Tanzania’s vanishing rain forests – Assessment of nature conservation values, biodiversity and importance for water catchment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 40, 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. B., Spies, T. A., & Fiorella, M. (1995). Estimating the age and structure of forest in a multi-ownership landscape in western Oregon, USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(4), 721–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, A. S., & Ve Wallin, O. D. (2000). Rate and patterns of landscape change in the Central Sikhote-alin Mountains, Russian Far East. Landscape Ecology, 15, 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdas Field Guide (2002). Erdas Imagine 8.6 User Guide. 2002.

  • ESCAP (Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific) (1997). Guidelines and manual on land-use planning and practices in watershed management and disaster reduction. ESCAP, United Nations.

  • Fearnside, P. M., Tardin, A. T., & Meira, L. G. M. (1990). Deforestation rate in Brazilian Amazonia. National Secretariat of Science and Technology, Brasilia, Brazil.

  • Fiorella, M., & Ripple, W. J. (1993). Determining successional stage of temperate coniferous forests with Landsat satellite data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 59, 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautam, P. A.,Webb, E. L., & Eiumnoh, A. (2002). GIS assessment of land use-land cover changes associated with community forestry implementation in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Mountain Research and Development, 22(1), 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam, P. A., Edward, W. L., Ganesh, S. P., & Michael, Z. A. (2003). Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 99, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. M., & Sussman, R. W. (1990). Deforestation history of the eastern rain forests of Madagascar from satellite images. Science, 248, 212–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, F. G., Botkin, D. B., Strebel, D. E., Woods, K. D., & Goetz, S. J. (1991). Large-scale patterns of forest succession as determined by remote sensing. Ecology, 72(2), 628–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. A., Ritters, K. H.,Wickham, J. D., Tankersley Jr., R. D., O’Neill, R. V., Chaloud, D. J., et al. (1997). An ecological assessment of the United States mid-Atlantic region: A landscape atlas. U.S. Environmental protection Agency, Report No. EPA/600/R-97/130, U.S. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 104 p.

  • Kadıoğulları, A. İ. (2005). Determination of temporal dynamics of forest resources using remote sensing and geographical information system: Case study in Gümüşhane and İnegöl State Forest Industries. Master thesis, 118 pages, Karadeniz Technical University.

  • Kammerbauer, J., & Ardon, C. (1999). Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical watershed in the hillside region of central Honduras. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 75, 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kılıç, S., Evrendilek, F., Berberoğlu S, & Demirkesen, A. C. (2006). Environmental monitoring of land-use and land-cover changes in a Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 114(1), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köse, S, & Başkent, E. Z. (1996). Thirty year history of even-aged management: What have we learned from Turkey? Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 5(3/4), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köse, S, & Başkent, E. Z. (2002). Investigating the 40-Year Legacy of Forest Management Plans in Eastern Black Sea Forests of Turkey. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 14 (2/3).

  • Laurance, W. F., & Bierregaard Jr., R. O. (1997). (Eds.) Tropical forest remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Luque, S. S., Lathrop, R. G., & Bognar, J. A. (1994). Temporal and spatial changes in an area of the New Jersey Pine Barrens landscape. Landscape Ecology, 9, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. U.S. forest Service General Technical Report PNW 351.

  • Naiman, R. J., Bisson, P. A., & Turner, M.G. (1997). Approaches to management at the watershed scale. In: Kohm, K.A., Franklin, J.F. (Eds.), Creating a forestry for the 21st century: The science of ecosystem management. Washington, D.C.: Island.

  • Nelson, R., Horning, N, & Stone, T. A. (1987). Determining the rate of forest conversion in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using Landsat MSS and AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 8(12), 1767–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, İ., & Özkan, Y. U. (2003). Monitoring the changes of forest areas using Landsat Satellite İmages in Armutlu Forest. Süleyman Demirel University Forest Faculty Periodical, Serial: A, Number: 1, ISSN: 1302–7085, Pages: 55–66.

  • Ripple, W. J., Bradshaw, G. A., & Spies, T. A. (1991). Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biological Conservation, 57, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skole, D., & Tucker, C. (1993). Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science, 260, 1905–1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies, T. A., Ripple, W. J., & Bradshaw, G. A. (1994). Dynamics and patterns of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecological Applications, 4(3), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Status, L. N., Strittholt, R. J., DellaSala, A. D., & Robinson R. (2002). Rate and pattern of forest disturbance in the Klamath-Siskiyou Ecoregion, USA between 1972 and 1992. Landscape Ecology, 17, 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strittholt, J. R., & Frost, P. A. (1995). Landscape change in the Tillamook Bay watershed. A report to the Tillamook Bay National Estuary Project, Garibaldi, Oregon. Earth Design Consultants, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

  • Tekle, K., & Hedlund, L. (2000). Land cover changes between 1958 and 1986 in Kalu District, Southern Wello, Ethiopia. Mountain Research and Development, 20(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. J., Holben, B. N., & Goff, E. (1994). Intensive forest clearing in Rondnia, Brazil, as detected by satellite remote sensing. Remote Sensing Environment, 15, 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunay, M., & Ateşoğlu A. Determining of non-natural changes in Bartın Province using remote sensing technique and GIS. Geography Department of Fatih University, 3.GIS Days, 6–9 October, İstanbul, 2004.

  • Yıldırım, H., Özel, M. E., Divan, N. J., & Akça, A. (2002). Satellite monitoring of land cover/land use change over 15 years and its impact on the environment in Gebze/Kocaeli – Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 26, 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, D., Wallin, D. O., & Hoa, Z. (1997). Rates and patterns of lansdcape change between 1972 and 1988 in the Changbai Mountain area of China and North Korea. Landscape Ecology, 12, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ihsan Kadioğullari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kadioğullari, A.I., Başkent, E.Z. Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in Eastern Turkey: a case study in Gümüşhane. Environ Monit Assess 138, 289–303 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9798-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9798-8

Keywords

Navigation