Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Constitutive Assumptions for the Strain Energy of a Generalized Elastic Membrane in a Nonlinear Contact Problem

  • Published:
Journal of Elasticity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For very thin shell-like structures it is common to ignore bending effects and model the structure using simple membrane theory. However, since the thickness of the membrane is not modeled explicitly in simple membrane theory it is not possible to use the three-dimensional strain energy function directly. Approximations must be introduced like the assumptions of: no thickness changes, generalized plane stress or incompressibility. In contrast, the theory of a Cosserat generalized membrane uses the three-dimensional strain energy function directly, it includes both thickness changes and shear deformation and it allows contact conditions to be formulated on the interface of the membrane with another body instead of on the middle surface of the membrane. A specific nonlinear contact problem is used to study these effects and comparison is made with solutions of a hierarchy of theories which include different levels of deformation through the thickness of the membrane and different formulations of the contact conditions. The results indicate that within the context of a simple membrane the assumption of generalized plane stress is best for this problem and that a generalized contact condition extends the range validity of the simple membrane solution to thicker membranes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blatz, P.J., Ko, W.L.: Application of finite elastic theory to the deformation of rubbery materials. Trans. Soc. Rheol. 6, 223–251 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Dret, H., Raoult, A.: The membrane shell model in nonlinear elasticity: A variational asymptotic derivation. J. Nonlinear Sci 6, 59–84 (1996)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Nadler, B., Papadopoulos, P., Steigmann, D.J.: Convexity of the strain-energy function in a two-scale model of ideal fabrics. J. Elast. 84(3), 223–244 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nadler, B., Steigmann, D.J.: Modeling the indentation, penetration and cavitation of elastic membrane. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 54, 2005–2029 (2006)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Naghdi, P.M.: The theory of shells and plates. In: Trusdell, C. (ed.) S. Flugge’s Handbuch der Physik, vol. VIa/2, pp. 425–640. Springer, Berlin (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naghdi, P.M., Rubin, M.B.: Restrictions on nonlinear constitutive equations for elastic shells. J. Elast. 39, 133–163 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubin, M.B.: Cosserat Theories: Shells, Rods and Points. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 79. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor, M., Steigmann, D.J.: Entropic thermoelasticity of thin polymeric films. Acta Mech. 183, 1–22 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Nadler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadler, B., Rubin, M.B. Analysis of Constitutive Assumptions for the Strain Energy of a Generalized Elastic Membrane in a Nonlinear Contact Problem. J Elasticity 97, 77–95 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-009-9204-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-009-9204-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation