Introduction

Tunisia is the most important olive-growing country of the southern Mediterranean region where over 30 % of its cultivated land is dedicated to olive growing (1.68 million ha). The annual production is recently estimated to 750,000 t of olives in 2009 (COI 2011).

Tunisia has an inheritance rich of table olive cultivars with about 24 cultivars, of which 20 are Tunisian and the others introduced. Among the local cultivars, Meski is the most important table olive cultivar cultivated in the country because of the very good taste of its fruits. Unfortunately, this cultivar has certain problems owing to its low productivity, its self sterility, its late entry in production and its alternate bearing. Moreover, this cultivar is very susceptible to olive leaf spot also known as olive scab, olive leaf spot and bird’s-eye spot (Graniti 1993; Shabi et al. 1994; Trapero and Blanco 2008; Viruega et al. 1997; Obanor et al. 2008; Vossen 2004) caused by Fusicladium oleagineum. This foliar disease is very common in the humid regions of Tunisia. Infected trees show defoliation of leaves which result in poor twig growth and poor fruit set, and great damage to plantations (Gonzalez-Lamothe et al. 2002). Infection is normally associated with high humidity and cool winter temperatures and low light conditions (cool and low light), where high temperatures restrict spore germination and growth (Al-khatib et al. 2010).

The use of protective fungicides, particularly copper compounds, against olive scab is a customary practice in growing olives (Teviotdale et al. 1989). Nowadays, there is a tendency towards reducing the number of active ingredients, especially those which are more dangerous to human and the environment, and to the search for new and alternative ways of control of the plant diseases. Application of copper-based fungicides is now the main method of olive leaf spot control in Tunisia and other olive growing countries. However, although there is a lower risk of pathogens developing resistance to copper-based fungicides since they have multi-site activity, some cases of resistance have been reported in bacterial diseases (Vanneste et al. 2003; Carisse et al. 2000). Washington et al. (1992) have reported that copper hydroxide has been ineffective on grey mould of strawberries. Additionally, copper compounds affect the disturbance of plant metabolism following Cu accumulation in the soil (Obanor et al. 2008; Zine El Aabidine et al. 2010).

Use of resistant olive cultivars is the most effective, economically feasible and ecologically sustainable means of controlling olive leaf spot. In this context, a breeding program was initiated in 1993 in a project entitled “olive breeding” (supported by the International Olive Council) (Fontanazza and Baldoni 1990). The cultivar Meski was crossed with the resistant cv. Picholine Languedoc and a collection of 45 hybrids are now being grown in the region of Oued Souhil (Nabeul). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the susceptibility of the 45 hybrids to olive leaf spot and to study the physical and chemical factors involved in the resistance to the fungal disease.

Materials and methods

Field site

The field site is located at the experimental station of the National Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Forestery of Tunisia (INGREF) located at Oued Souhil in the region of Nabeul (latitude NR 36 (27′ 22″, E10 longitude (42′ 02″). This region is characterized by a humid weather climate that favours olive leaf spot. The station has a collection of the principal Tunisian and foreign cultivars of olive, such as: Chemlali, Chetoui, Manzanille, Picholine and Meski, and a collection of 365 hybrids from crosses of Meski with several pollinating local and foreign cultivars.

Olive tree hybrids studied

The hybrids studied in this project were a population of 45 descendants resulting from a crossing between Picholine de Languedoc and the local cultivar Meski. The descendants were planted in Oued Souhil (Nabeul) in 1993. Letters represent the lines in the orchard and the numbers indicate the trees.

  • 12H–13H–14H–15H–16H–17H–18H–19H–22H–23H

  • 6I–8I–11I–12I–13I–14I–15I–16I–18I–19I–21I–22I–23I

  • 6J–8J–9J–10J–11J–12J–14J–15J–16J–18J–20J–21J–22J–23J

  • 8K–9K–10K

Evaluation of hybrid susceptibility in the field

Leaf sampling

A total of 120 leaves were taken randomly from each hybrid with 20 leaves per branch on six branches selected in various directions. The leaves were placed in plastic bags and taken to the laboratory in order to determine the latent and visible infections.

The leaves were sampled at the end of summer to determine the number of latent infections and in the spring for the number of lesions.

Latent infection

Latent infections were determined according to the method of Shabi et al. (1994). To determine latent infection, leaves were dipped in 5 % NaOH for 20 min (Shabi et al. 1994) and examined for characteristic black spots.

Visible infection

A total of 120 leaves were taken during spring (at the beginning of April). Samples of branches 20–25 cm in length were taken from different parts of the olive tree. The samples were placed in plastic bags and brought back to the laboratory in order to determine the percentage of infected leaves. The severity of peacock spot was determined by leaf coverage with lesions, the number of lesions on each leaf, and the diameter of lesions.

Evaluation of hybrid susceptibility in the laboratory

Inoculum preparation

Conidia of F. oleagineum used in the inoculation were obtained from diseased leaves of olive tree cv Meski. The infected leaves were dried at ambient temperature for 2 weeks and then stored at 5°C in darkness (López-Doncel et al. 2000).

To obtain conidial suspensions, the infected leaves were agitated in sterile distilled water for 2 h at 80 rpm at ambient temperature. The conidial suspension was then filtered to eliminate vegetable matter. The concentration of the conidial suspension was adjusted to 105 conidia ml−1 using a Malessez cell.

Leaf inoculation

To evaluate the cultivar susceptibility to olive leaf spot, detached leaves of each cultivar were used. Detached leaves were surface-disinfected with tissue paper moistened with ethanol for 30 s and placed in plastic bugs containing sterile distilled water to maintain a high relative humidity. Leaves were inoculated with 5 μl of a conidial suspension of F. oleagineum (1.5 × 105 conidia ml−1) following the method of López-Doncel et al. (2000). Control leaves were inoculated with sterile distilled water. The plastic bags were closed and incubated at a temperature of 15°C and a relative humidity of 90 % in the dark. The incidence (% of infected leaves) and the severity (number of spots per leaf) were determined after 15 days.

Histological studies

Measurements of trichome density

Histological measurements of tissues were made on ten leaves obtained from each cultivar and hybrid. Cross-sections of fresh leaf material were prepared for microscopic examination. Trichome density (number per unit leaf area) and diameter were measured in artificial replicas of polish (colodium) applied to the abaxial surface of ten leaves per treatment. Trichome density was measured according to Larkin et al. (1996) from the upper leaf surface. The leaf discs (area-0.29 cm2) were taken from the centre of the leaf blade and counted for the number of trichomes under a compound light microscope. Trichome density was calculated as the trichome number per disc area.

Cuticle thickness

The leaves were cut transversally using a sharp blade with a regular movement and without sawing to keep leaf structures intact. The cuts were made perpendicular to the axis of the leaf. The cuttings were stained with carmine after a preliminary dipping in bleach. The cut pieces were subsequently washed with sterile distilled water until obtaining clear water. Then two to three drops of iodine green were deposited on the cut piece which was followed by washing with water. The histological structure of the cut surface were observed using a microscope. The total thickness of the leaf and the thickness of the cuticle were measured.

Phenolic compounds content and identification

Polyphenols content

Phenolic compounds were extracted according to the method of Mau et al. (2001). One hundred mg of leaf powder were mixed with 10 ml of methanol. After 20 h of agitation at a temperature of 25°C in the darkness, the mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 2,000 rpm. The extract was stored at 4°C in the dark.

The proportioning of the phenolic compounds was performed according to the method of Folin Ciocalteu (Singleton et al. 1999). 500 μl of the extract was diluted at 1/10 with methanol and mixed with 2.5 ml of Folin (10 %) to which 2 ml of NaCO3 7.5 % were added. The mixture was left to incubate for 90 min and the absorbance was determined at 760 nm.

The standard used in this work was gallic acid, prepared at concentrations varying from 5 to 100 mg l−1. The content of polyphenols was expressed as mg of equivalent of gallic acid per gram of dry matter (mg EAG g−1 Ms).

Polyphenol identification

Phenolic compounds were extracted according to the method of Bouaziz and Sayadi (2005). A mixture of methanol and water (300 ml, 80:20 v/v) was added to 60 g of leaf powder and the mixture was agitated in the darkness for 20 h. Thereafter, the solution was filtered with the filter paper GF/F. The extract was placed in a vacuum at 40°C to desiccate it. The residue obtained was dissolved in 5 ml of methanol, and then preserved in pyrex flasks at 0°C in the darkness before chromatographic analysis.

The qualitative analysis of the phenolic compounds was carried out by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The apparatus used (Shimadzu) was composed of a pump LLC-10ATvp and a detector UV SPD-10 Avp. The column used for the analysis of polyphenols was a C-18 (4.6 × 250 mm) Shim-pack VP-ODS. The elutants were detected at 280 nm with the temperature maintained at 40°C. The mobile phase was phosphoric acid with 0.1 % in water (A) and the acetonitrile with 70 % in water (B) for a duration of 50 min. The conditions of elution of the phenolic compounds were: 0–25, 10 25 % B; 25–35 min, 25–80 % B; 35–37 min, 80,100 % B, 37–40 min, 100 % B. The washing and the reconditioning of the column (40–50 min) were carried out with a gradient flux field 100–10 % B. The flow was 0.6 ml min−1 with a volume of injection of 50 μl. The identification and the quantification of the phenolic compounds from the leaves of the hybrids and cultivars were based on their spectra and their times of retention in comparison with the phenolic standards available (Bouaziz and Sayadi 2005).

Data analysis

Latent and visible infections were based on a total of 120 leaves taken randomly from each hybrid with 20 leaves per branch on six branches selected in various directions. The sampling was repeated three times and data were transformed to meet the requirement for normal distribution. The results were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test (Software SPSS version 18).

Principal components analysis (CPA) was done using MVSP software. The dendrogram was created by using the UPGMA method and Euclidian distances using the software NTSys (Rohlf 1998).

Results

Evaluation of latent infection of hybrids in the field

The results shown in Fig. 1 reveal an important variation in the susceptibility of the hybrids to the disease. The analysis of variance and the means comparison revealed significant differences between the hybrids. Indeed, the cultivar Picholine and hybrid 6I were the most resistant to the disease since no latent infections were observed. The hybrids 18I, 19I, 12I, 13I, 9K, 10K and 12H were less resistant with the percentages of latent infection not exceeding 5 %. However, cv. Meski and the hybrids 14I, 21I, 14H, 17H, 16H, 18H, 6J, 8J, 20J and 23J were the most susceptible to the disease, with the percentages of latent infections ranging from 20 % to 30 %.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage of latent infection of hybrid leaves collected from Oued Souhil at the experimental field. Bars indicates the standard deviation

Evaluation of visible infection of hybrids in the field

Results presented in Fig. 2 show that cv. Picholine and hybrid 6I were the most resistant in the studied collection since no symptoms were observed, even in spring when environmental conditions were very favourable for the development of the disease. The hybrids 12I, 13I, 18I, 19I, 22I, 9K, 10K, 12H, 15H, 19H, 15J and 22J were less resistant to the disease since the percentages of infection did not exceed 10 %. However, cv. Meski and hybrids 14I and 17H were very susceptible to the disease since the percentages of infected leaves were about 90 %. These hybrids presented the highest number of lesions per leaf as compared to the other hybrids (Fig. 3). The mean number of lesions per leaf was 8.35, 8.63 and 9.58 spots/leaf, respectively for cv. Meski and hybrids 14I and 17H. The lesions on the leaves of cv. Meski had the largest diameters (6 mm) (data not shown).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of visible infection on hybrid leaves collected from Oued Souhil at the experimental field. Bars indicates the standard deviation

Fig. 3
figure 3

Number of lesions per leaf on hybrid leaves collected from Oued Souhil at the experimental field. Bars indicates the standard deviation

The area of the leaf occupied by lesions was highest in cv. Meski and hybrids 17 (Fig. 4) and confirmed their high susceptibility to the disease.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Area of leaf covered by lesions of olive leaf spot on hybrids leaves collected from Oued Souhil at the experimental field. Bars indicates the standard deviation

Evaluation of susceptibility of hybrid leaves in the laboratory

The evaluation of the susceptibility of hybrids in the laboratory showed that the typical symptoms of inoculated leaves started to appear on cv. Meski and the two highly susceptible hybrids 14 I and 17H. The characteristic lesions appeared 5 weeks after inoculation.

The results presented in Fig. 5 showed that there was an important difference between the percentages of infected leaves of the hybrids. A positive and significant correlation was observed between the results obtained in the laboratory and the field (Fig. 6). Indeed, only the hybrids 13I, 19I, 22I, 10K, 14H, 23H and 15J were shown to be more susceptible in the laboratory than in the field.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Percentage of infection on detached hybrids leaves inoculated with Fusicladium oleagineum. Bars indicates the standard deviation

Fig. 6
figure 6

Relationship between of percentage of infected leaves of hybrid in the field and in the laboratory

Phenolic compounds content

The content of phenolic compounds varied among the hybrids. For example, the leaves of hybrid 23H contain the lowest content polyphenols (26.25 mg EAG g−1 Ms). However, hybrids 6I, 19I, 22I, 8K and 13H had the highest content of polyphenols, reaching 100 mg EAG g−1 Ms. The phenolic content registered for the two parents Meski and Picholine were 71,63 and 54,08 mg EAG g−1 Ms.

The correlation between the polyphenol content and the percentage of infection was not significant (r = 0.068, P > 0.05).

Identification of phenolic compounds

Identification of phenolic compounds of the two parents cvs. Meski and Picholine (Fig. 7) showed the presence of a high peak which corresponded to oleuropein. The parents cvs. Meski and Picholine had similar patterns in their composition of phenolic metabolites and a very similar profile of oleuropein content (3.766 mg ml−1 and 3.616 mg ml−1).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Qualitative analysis of phenolic compounds of cvs. Meski and Picholine

Trichome size and density

Measurements of the size of trichomes showed a variation in their diameter among the hybrids that ranged between 88 and 135 μm. The parent cv. Meski and the hybrids 17H, 15J, 22I, had the smallest sizes of trichomes as compared to the other hybrids where the diameters were less than 90 μm. The trichomes of cv. Picholine and hybrids 6I, 19I, 10K had the highest diameter, exceeding 125 μm. Hybrids 14I, 17H, 8J and parent cv. Meski had the lowest densities of trichome (10 trichomes/mm2); however, the resistant parent cv. Picholine and the resistant hybrids 6I, 12I, 13I, 15I, 18I, 19I, 9K, 12H and 22J had trichome densities that varied between 20 and 28 trichomes/mm2 (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Density of trichomes of hybrid leaves collected from Oued Souhil experimental field. Bars indicates the standard deviation

The trichome density was negatively correlated with the percentage of infection (r = 0.60, p < 0.05). However there was no correlation between the size of trichomes and the percentage of infection (r = 0.3, p > 0.05).

Cuticle thickness

The thickness of the cuticle measured for the studied hybrids varied between 5 and 10 μm (Fig. 9). Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the different hybrids in the collection. The very susceptible hybrids (17H, and 20J) and the parent cultivar cv. Meski had the thinnest cuticle (5–6 μm), whereas the resistant hybrids 6I, 22I, 23I, 9K, 10K, 19H, 22H, 9J, 14J, 15J, and cv. Picholine had thicker cuticles (>9 μm).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Cuticle thickness on hybrid leaves collected from Oued Souhil experimental field. Bars indicates the standard deviation

The cuticle thickness was significantly and negatively correlated with the percentage of infected leaves in the field (r = 0.86 p < 0.05).

Discussion

Genetic resistance represents currently the best effective means to control this disease (Anton and Laborda 1989). In order to introduce resistance to Fusicladium oleagineum in the local Tunisian cultivar, a cross has been made since 1993 between the susceptible cultivar “Meski” and the resistant cultivar “Picholine du Languedoc”, a cultivar of French origin

The collection of 45 hybrids has been studied in order to identify the resistant descendants and determine the factors that could be involved in the resistance to the fungus.

In the absence of favourable conditions for the disease, infection by the pathogen is latent without any visible symptoms for a long period. During this period, the detection of the disease was based on the reaction to a solution of sodium hydroxide (5 %). The leaves dipped in this solution generate the appearance of black spots due to the reaction of the alkaline solution with the phenolic compounds produced in the penetration site of the pathogen (Benitez et al. 2005): an oxidation of these compounds which accumulate on the lesion in response to infection (Roca et al. 2007).

The determination of latent infection revealed variability among the hybrids with the percentages of infected leaves varying between 0 and 30 %. Some hybrids did not present any spotting, or only some leaves were infected (6I, 18I and 19I), and consequently are regarded as resistant to the disease. However, according to Benitez et al. (2005) the evaluation of susceptibility cannot based on the latent infections and must be done using the visible infections. Therefore, the determination of visible infection during the spring (April) revealed a high variability in susceptibility of the hybrids to the disease. Based on the percentages of infested leaves, one third of the hybrid collection was considered to be resistant since the percentage of infected leaves did not exceed 10 %. Among these hybrids, line 6I was considered as very resistant since no spotting was observed. It seems that the parent Picholine has transferred all the resistant genes to the hybrid 6I. The evaluation of susceptibility of hybrids in the laboratory demonstrated the same results as found in the field and this positive correlation has been reported by Rallo et al. (2005) and Moral et al. (2005). However, some hybrids (13I, 19I, 22I, 10K, 14H, 23H, and 15J) were found to be more susceptible in the laboratory than in the field due to the differences in temperature and humidity. According to Trapero and Blanco (2008), the principal cause of this difference is due to the effect of the environmental conditions (temperature, RH and light). In the laboratory, the temperature and relative humidity are optimal and very favourable for the development of the disease, while in the field, several other factors influence the development of the disease.

According to these results, resistance to Fusicladium oleagineum is determined by several genes. Benitez et al. (2005) demonstrated that olive resistance to the disease is the result of an active defence response and that this active defence is genotype dependent. These authors observed higher constitutive expression of defence genes in the resistant cultivar and a faster and stronger induction in gene expression after infection. They identified 162 cDNA fragments corresponding to transcripts that showed altered abundance during the defence response of a resistant cultivar to the fungal disease.

In order to determine the factors involved in the resistance to F. oleagineum some physical and biochemical parameters were analysed. Results showed that phenolic compounds content was not correlated with the susceptibility to the disease, confirming the results obtained by Rahioui et al. (2009) and Zine El Aabidine et al. (2010). According to these authors, the qualitative analysis of polyphenols using LC-MS showed no specific compounds related to the resistance.

Our results showed that the abundant phenolic compound found is oleuropeine. Several reports demonstrated that extract of the olive-tree is dominated by oleuropein, rutin, luteolin-7-glucoside, versbacoside, tyrosol, apigenin, vanillin, diosmetin, rutin and acide vanillique verbascoside (Bianco and Uccella 2000; Japón-Luján et al. 2006).

Oleuropein, tyrosol, hydroxytyrosol and rutin display a fungicidal effect (Baidez et al. 2007; Pereira et al. 2007). The derivatives of oleuropein, like oleuropein glucoside, seems to be implied in the defence of the olive tree by inhibiting the pectinases of F. oleagineum (Graniti 1993) and by constituting a precursor of phytoalexins (Uccella 2000), extremely toxic molecules induced in response to pathogen infection (El Modafar et al. 1995, 1999). The derivative non-glucosidic form (oleuropein aglycone) of oleuropein expresses antioxidant activity (Galli and Visioli 1999) and great cytotoxicity (Babich and Visioli 2003). Therefore, the oleuropein aglycone could play an important role in the hypersensitive reaction frequently associated with leaf defence in response to pathogen challenge (Lam et al. 2001). According to Zine El Aabidine et al. (2010), tyrosol and its derivatives were associated with constitutive resistance, whereas oleuropein and rutin were associated with induced resistance.

Analysis of the leaf cuticles of each hybrid indicated a variation in the trichome density. Thus resistant hybrids were characterised by a high number of trichomes in comparison with susceptible cultivars. A high correlation between trichome density and plant resistance to pathogens has been reported (Menendez Sevillano et al. 1997; Mmbaga and Steadman 1990 and Zaiter et al. 1990). It is generally believed that pubescent leaves will be more resistant against pathogens, pests and drought than less pubescent ones of the same species due to a mechanical restriction to pathogen activities caused by a high density of trichomes (Levin 1973). Trichomes are important structural barriers and components of resistance and are also sites for accumulation of secondary metabolites that may act as defensive, repellent or toxic compounds (Stenglein et al. 2005).

The thickness of cuticle was found to be an important factor that stops the invasion of leaves by the pathogen. Indeed, a negative and significant correlation was obtained between the thickness of the cuticle and the susceptibility of hybrids to the disease. Several works have reported that the thickness of the cuticle varies considerably among the cultivars in the same species (Jeffree 2006). To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of the implication of the cuticle thickness in the mechanism of resistance to F. oleagineum. The cutin of the cuticle may play a key role in leaf protection because it is barrier against the entry of the fungus

Our results showed that cv. Picholine and hybrid 6I are totally resistant to the disease and therefore could be used to replant orchards mainly in the humid regions where the environmental conditions are favourable to olive leaf spot. Furthermore, cv. Picholine, a green table olive, is highly productive. These reasons might justify the inclusion of this line in breeding programmes for resistance to olive leaf spot.