The impact of parity on life course blood pressure trajectories: the HUNT study in Norway

  • Eirin B. Haug
  • Julie Horn
  • Amanda Rose Markovitz
  • Abigail Fraser
  • Corrie Macdonald-Wallis
  • Kate Tilling
  • Pål Richard Romundstad
  • Janet Wilson Rich-Edwards
  • Bjørn Olav Åsvold


The drop in blood pressure during pregnancy may persist postpartum, but the impact of pregnancy on blood pressure across the life course is not known. In this study we examined blood pressure trajectories for women in the years preceding and following pregnancy and compared life course trajectories of blood pressure for parous and nulliparous women. We linked information on all women who participated in the population-based, longitudinal HUNT Study, Norway with pregnancy information from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. A total of 23,438 women were included with up to 3 blood pressure measurements per woman. Blood pressure trajectories were compared using a mixed effects linear spline model. Before first pregnancy, women who later gave birth had similar mean blood pressure to women who never gave birth. Women who delivered experienced a drop after their first birth of − 3.32 mmHg (95% CI, − 3.93, − 2.71) and − 1.98 mmHg (95% CI, − 2.43, − 1.53) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Subsequent pregnancies were associated with smaller reductions. These pregnancy-related reductions in blood pressure led to persistent differences in mean blood pressure, and at age 50, parous women still had lower systolic (− 1.93 mmHg; 95% CI, − 3.33, − 0.53) and diastolic (− 1.36 mmHg; 95% CI, − 2.26, − 0.46) blood pressure compared to nulliparous women. The findings suggest that the first pregnancy and, to a lesser extent, successive pregnancies are associated with lasting and clinically relevant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.


Life course Blood pressure Parity Pregnancy Epidemiology 



The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT Study) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Nord-Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Health Authority, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10654_2018_358_MOESM1_ESM.docx (457 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 456 kb)


  1. 1.
    Franklin SS, Gustin W, Wong ND, et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. Circulation. 1997;96:308–15. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wills AK, Lawlor DA, Matthews FE, et al. Life course trajectories of systolic blood pressure using longitudinal data from eight UK cohorts. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000440. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Muniz-Terrera G, Bakra E, Hardy R, et al. Modelling life course blood pressure trajectories using Bayesian adaptive splines. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macdonald-Wallis C, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, et al. Blood pressure change in normotensive, gestational hypertensive, preeclamptic, and essential hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertension. 2012;59:1241–8. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palmer SK, Moore LG, Young DA, et al. Altered blood pressure course during normal pregnancy and increased preeclampsia at high altitude (3100 meters) in Colorado. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1161–8. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clapp JF, Capeless E. Cardiovascular function before, during, and after the first and subsequent pregnancies. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:1469–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gunderson EP, Chiang V, Lewis CE, et al. Long-term blood pressure changes measured from before to after pregnancy relative to nonparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1294–302. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morris EA, Hale SA, Badger GJ, et al. Pregnancy induces persistent changes in vascular compliance in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:633.e1-6. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dratva J, Schneider C, Schindler C, et al. Is there a differential impact of parity on blood pressure by age? J Hypertens. 2014;32:2146–51. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ness RB, Kramer RA, Flegal KM. Gravidity, blood pressure, and hypertension among white women in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 1993;4:303–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jang M, Lee Y, Choi J, et al. Association between parity and blood pressure in Korean women: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2010–2012. Korean J Fam Med. 2015;36:341–8. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hardy R, Lawlor DA, Black S, et al. Number of children and coronary heart disease risk factors in men and women from a British birth cohort. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114:721–30. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee-Feldstein A, Harburg E, Hauenstein L. Parity and blood pressure among four race-stress groups of females in Detroit. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;111:356–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kritz-Silverstein D, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E. The relation of reproductive history and parenthood to subsequent hypertension. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130:399–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khalid MEM. The effect of age, obesity, and parity on blood pressure and hypertension in non-pregnant married women. J Fam Community Med. 2006;13:103–7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fritz J, Edlinger M, Kelleher C, et al. Mediation analysis of the relationship between sex, cardiovascular risk factors and mortality from coronary heart disease: findings from the population-based VHM&PP cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2015;243:86–92. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parikh NI, Cnattingius S, Dickman PW, et al. Parity and risk of later-life maternal cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 2010;159(215–221):e6. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rich-Edwards JW, Fraser A, Lawlor DA, Catov JM. Pregnancy characteristics and women’s future cardiovascular health: an underused opportunity to improve women’s health? Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36:57–70. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krokstad S, Langhammer A, Hveem K, et al. Cohort profile: the HUNT study, norway. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:968–77. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holmen J, Midthjell K, Krüger Ø, et al. The Nord-Trøndelag health study 1995–97 (HUNT 2): objectives, contents, methods and participation. Nor Epidemiol. 2003;13:19–32.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holmen J, Midthjell K, Bjartveit K, et al. The Nord-Trøndelag health survey 1984–1986. Purpose, background and methods. Participation, non-participation and frequency distributions. Verdal: Senter for samfunnsmedisinsk forskning, Statens Institutt for folkehelse(SIFF). Helsetjenesteforskning; 1990.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Irgens LM. The medical birth registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:435–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cui JS, Hopper JL, Harrap SB. Antihypertensive treatments obscure familial contributions to blood pressure variation. Hypertension. 2003;41:207–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tobin MD, Sheehan NA, Scurrah KJ, Burton PR. Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure. Stat Med. 2005;24:2911–35. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Statistics Norway (1998) Standard classification of occupations. Accessed 15 July 2016.
  26. 26.
    Thomsen LCV, Klungsøyr K, Roten LT, et al. Validity of the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:943–50. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moth FN, Sebastian TR, Horn J, et al. Validity of a selection of pregnancy complications in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:519–27. Scholar
  28. 28.
    Howe LD, Tilling K, Matijasevich A, et al. Linear spline multilevel models for summarising childhood growth trajectories: a guide to their application using examples from five birth cohorts. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016;25:1854–74. Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6:461–4. Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B. MLwiN. Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol; 2009.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Joham AE, Boyle JA, Zoungas S, Teede HJ. Hypertension in reproductive-aged women with polycystic ovary syndrome and association with obesity. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28:847–51. Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cundiff JM, Uchino BN, Smith TW, Birmingham W. Socioeconomic status and health: education and income are independent and joint predictors of ambulatory blood pressure. J Behav Med. 2015;38:9–16. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, DuToit S. Advances in analysis of longitudinal data. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:79–107. Scholar
  34. 34.
    Langhammer A, Krokstad S, Romundstad P, et al. The HUNT study: participation is associated with survival and depends on socioeconomic status, diseases and symptoms. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:143. Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holmen J, Holmen TL, Tverdal A, et al. Blood pressure changes during 22-year of follow-up in large general population: the HUNT study, Norway. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16:94. Scholar
  36. 36.
    NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants. Lancet. 2017. Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thornburg KL, Jacobson SL, Giraud GD, Morton MJ. Hemodynamic changes in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2000;24:11–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cornelissen VA, Smart NA. Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e004473. Scholar
  39. 39.
    Natland ST, Nilsen TIL, Midthjell K, et al. Lactation and cardiovascular risk factors in mothers in a population-based study: the HUNT-study. Int Breastfeed J. 2012;7:8. Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lupton SJ, Chiu CL, Lujic S, et al. Association between parity and breastfeeding with maternal high blood pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:454.e1-7. Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gore SA, Brown DM, West DS. The role of postpartum weight retention in obesity among women: a review of the evidence. Ann Behav Med Publ Soc Behav Med. 2003;26:149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cook NR, Cohen J, Hebert PR, et al. Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:701–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Luo Z-C, An N, Xu H-R, et al. The effects and mechanisms of primiparity on the risk of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(Suppl 1):36–45. Scholar
  44. 44.
    Basso O, Christensen K, Olsen J. Higher risk of pre-eclampsia after change of partner. An effect of longer interpregnancy intervals? Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2001;12:624–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:33–8. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eirin B. Haug
    • 1
  • Julie Horn
    • 1
    • 4
  • Amanda Rose Markovitz
    • 2
    • 5
  • Abigail Fraser
    • 3
  • Corrie Macdonald-Wallis
    • 3
  • Kate Tilling
    • 3
  • Pål Richard Romundstad
    • 1
  • Janet Wilson Rich-Edwards
    • 2
    • 5
  • Bjørn Olav Åsvold
    • 1
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.The Harvard T.H Chan School of Public HealthHarvard UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit and Population Health SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Levanger HospitalNord-Trøndelag Hospital TrustLevangerNorway
  5. 5.Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology, Brigham and Women’s HospitalHarvard Medical ShcoolBostonUSA
  6. 6.Department of Endocrinology, St. Olavs HospitalTrondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations