The impact of parity on life course blood pressure trajectories: the HUNT study in Norway
The drop in blood pressure during pregnancy may persist postpartum, but the impact of pregnancy on blood pressure across the life course is not known. In this study we examined blood pressure trajectories for women in the years preceding and following pregnancy and compared life course trajectories of blood pressure for parous and nulliparous women. We linked information on all women who participated in the population-based, longitudinal HUNT Study, Norway with pregnancy information from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. A total of 23,438 women were included with up to 3 blood pressure measurements per woman. Blood pressure trajectories were compared using a mixed effects linear spline model. Before first pregnancy, women who later gave birth had similar mean blood pressure to women who never gave birth. Women who delivered experienced a drop after their first birth of − 3.32 mmHg (95% CI, − 3.93, − 2.71) and − 1.98 mmHg (95% CI, − 2.43, − 1.53) in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Subsequent pregnancies were associated with smaller reductions. These pregnancy-related reductions in blood pressure led to persistent differences in mean blood pressure, and at age 50, parous women still had lower systolic (− 1.93 mmHg; 95% CI, − 3.33, − 0.53) and diastolic (− 1.36 mmHg; 95% CI, − 2.26, − 0.46) blood pressure compared to nulliparous women. The findings suggest that the first pregnancy and, to a lesser extent, successive pregnancies are associated with lasting and clinically relevant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
KeywordsLife course Blood pressure Parity Pregnancy Epidemiology
The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT Study) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Nord-Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Health Authority, and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Macdonald-Wallis C, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, et al. Blood pressure change in normotensive, gestational hypertensive, preeclamptic, and essential hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertension. 2012;59:1241–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.187039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Khalid MEM. The effect of age, obesity, and parity on blood pressure and hypertension in non-pregnant married women. J Fam Community Med. 2006;13:103–7.Google Scholar
- 16.Fritz J, Edlinger M, Kelleher C, et al. Mediation analysis of the relationship between sex, cardiovascular risk factors and mortality from coronary heart disease: findings from the population-based VHM&PP cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2015;243:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.08.048.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Holmen J, Midthjell K, Krüger Ø, et al. The Nord-Trøndelag health study 1995–97 (HUNT 2): objectives, contents, methods and participation. Nor Epidemiol. 2003;13:19–32.Google Scholar
- 21.Holmen J, Midthjell K, Bjartveit K, et al. The Nord-Trøndelag health survey 1984–1986. Purpose, background and methods. Participation, non-participation and frequency distributions. Verdal: Senter for samfunnsmedisinsk forskning, Statens Institutt for folkehelse(SIFF). Helsetjenesteforskning; 1990.Google Scholar
- 25.Statistics Norway (1998) Standard classification of occupations. https://www.ssb.no/a/publikasjoner/pdf/nos_c521/nos_c521.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2016.
- 30.Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B. MLwiN. Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol; 2009.Google Scholar
- 33.Gibbons RD, Hedeker D, DuToit S. Advances in analysis of longitudinal data. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar