Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tacit knowledge

  • ESSAY
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information that is not made explicit is nonetheless embedded in most of our standard procedures. In its simplest form, embedded information may take the form of prior knowledge held by the researcher and presumed to be agreed to by consumers of the research product. More interesting are the settings in which the prior information is held unconsciously by both researcher and reader, or when the very form of an “effective procedure” incorporates its creator’s (unspoken) understanding of a problem. While it may not be productive to exhaustively detail the embedded or tacit knowledge that manifests itself in creative scientific work, at least at the beginning, we may want to routinize methods for extracting and documenting the ways of thinking that make “experts” expert. We should not back away from both expecting and respecting the tacit knowledge the pervades our work and the work of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source Reference [3]

Fig. 2

Source “Goldbach-1,000,000” Original uploader was Reddish at www.en.wikipedia—Transferred from www.en.wikipedia; Transfer was stated to be made by User: Glivi. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons—https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Goldbach-1000000.png#/media/File:Goldbach-1000000.png

Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Source Reference [12]

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weizenbaum J. ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun ACM. 1966;9(1):36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weizenbaum J. Computer power and human reason. From Calculation to Judgment. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wallace M, Dunlop G. Eliza, the Rogerian therapist. ©1999 manifestation.com PMB 417, 10800 Alpharetta Hwy, Suite 208, Roswell, GA 30076. http://psych.fullerton.edu/mbirnbaum/psych101/Eliza.htm. Accessed 29 March 2017.

  4. Weizenbaum J. 1976. Op cit. p. 7.

  5. Douglas Hofstadter and the Fluid Analogies Research Group. Fluid concepts and creative analogies. New York: Basic Books; 1995. p. 155ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jens Schanze and Judith Malek-Mahldavi. Plug & Pray. (Film) Mascha Film GbR; 2010.

  7. Wikipedia entry on Michael Polanyi. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Polanyi. Accessed Aug 2015.

  8. Polanyi M. The tacit dimension. With a new forward by Amartya Sen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009. p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid. p. 18.

  10. Ibid. p. 21.

  11. Taylor P. “George Polya” June 2000. Adapted slightly January 2008 with help from Kevin McAvaney. Australian Mathematics Trust. http://www.amt.edu.au/biogpolya.html. Accessed 12 Aug 2015.

  12. Polya G. How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polya G. Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1966. p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weizenbaum 1976, Op Cit. p. 261.

  15. Walker AM, Zhou X, Ananthakrishnan AN, Weiss LS, Shen R, Sobel RE, Bate A, Reynolds RF. Computer-assisted expert case definition in electronic health records. Int J Med Inform. 2016;86:62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothman KJ. A show of confidence. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:1362–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70(2):129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, Altman DG. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(4):337–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rothman KJ. Disengaging from statistical significance. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(5):443–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Prof Albert Hofman, Editor of the European Journal of Epidemiology, for giving me the chance to share these ideas.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Muir Walker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walker, A.M. Tacit knowledge. Eur J Epidemiol 32, 261–267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0256-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0256-9

Keywords

Navigation