Skip to main content
Log in

A new pH-based tracing method for flow mixing studies in closed-loop experimental flumes: evaluation in an open-channel confluence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laboratory experiments based on the dispersion and mixing of passive scalars in open-channel flows are invaluable to investigate flow patterns and to provide empirical values of the mixing coefficient in well-controlled conditions. The study details a new flow tracing method measuring the concentration of a passive scalar in laboratory open-channel flows based on pH measurements. Its main advantage is that the scalar exiting from the open-channel is eliminated downstream of the measuring locations, allowing long-time experiments in closed loop. The method is first validated in a uniform flow in a straight, rectangular channel. It is then used in a complex 3D flow, at the confluence of two open-channel flows. The pros and cons of the new method, in terms of performance and implementation, are finally discussed in view of other widely used tracing methods such as conductivity probes, fluorometers and video-imaging optical methods. The study confirms that the present tracing method is efficient for long-time closed-loop experiments. The calibration procedures are detailed, as well the sources of errors, leading to a relative uncertainty equal to a few percent of the concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All dimensionless concentration data (Fig. 5) are provided in Appendix.

References

  1. Fischer HB, List EJ, Koh RCY, Imberger J, Brooks NH (1979) Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chau KW (2000) Transverse mixing coefficient measurements in an open rectangular channel. Adv Environ Res 4(4):287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00028-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gualtieri C, Mucherino C (2007) Transverse turbulent diffusion in straight rectangular channels. In: 5th International symposium on environmental hydraulics (ISEH 2007), Tempe, USA

  4. Huai W, Shi H, Yang Z, Zeng Y (2018) Estimating the transverse mixing coefficient in laboratory flumes and natural rivers. Water Air Soil Pollut 229(8):252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lane SN, Parsons DR, Best JL, Orfeo O, Kostaschuk RA, Hardy RJ (2008) Causes of rapid mixing at a junction of two large rivers: Río Paraná and Río Paraguay, Argentina. J Geophys Res 113:F02024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pouchoulin S, Le Coz J, Mignot E, Gond L, Riviere N (2020) Predicting transverse mixing efficiency downstream of a river confluence. Water Resour Res 56(10):e2019WR026367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Webel G, Schatzmann M (1984) Transverse mixing in open channel flow. J Hydraul Eng 110(4):423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulz M, Priegnitz J, Klasmeier J, Heller S, Meinecke S, Feibicke M (2012) Effect of bed surface roughness on longitudinal dispersion in artificial open channels. Hydrol Process 26(2):272–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lagoun AM, Benziada S (2016) Experimental study of longitudinal dispersion on trapezoidal open channel. In: Energy, transportation and global warming (pp 667–676). Springer, Cham

  10. Farzadkhoo M, Keshavarzi A, Hamidifar H, Javan M (2019) Sudden pollutant discharge in vegetated compound meandering rivers. CATENA 182:104155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer HB (1969) The effect of bends on dispersion in streams. Water Resour Res 5(2):496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer HB, Hanamura T (1975) The effect of roughness strips on transverse mixing in hydraulic models. Water Resour Res 11(2):362–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed KM, Rajaratnam N, Stanley SJ (2001) Mixing with multiple circular turbulent jets. J Hydraul Res 39(2):163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boxall JB, Guymer I, Marion A (2003) Transverse mixing in sinuous natural open channel flows. J Hydraul Res 41(2):153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marion A, Zaramella M (2006) Effects of velocity gradients and secondary flow on the dispersion of solutes in a meandering channel. J Hydraul Eng 132(12):1295–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boxall IG (2007) Longitudinal mixing in meandering channels: new experimental data set and verification of a predictive technique. Water Res 41(2):341–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh S, Ahmad Z, Kothyari UC (2010) Mixing coefficients for longitudinal and vertical mixing in the near field of a surface pollutant discharge. J Hydraul Res 48(1):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lepot M, Momplot A, Lipeme Kouyi G, Bertrand-Krajewski J-B (2014) Rhodamine WT tracer experiments to check flow measurements in sewers. Flow Meas Instrum 40:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2014.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Babarutsi S, Chu VH (1991) Dye-concentration distribution in shallow recirculating flows. J Hydraul Eng 117(5):643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Balachandar R, Chu VH, Zhang J (1997) Experimental study of turbulent concentration flow field in the wake of a bluff body. J Fluids Eng 119(2):263–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Balachandar R, Tachie MF, Chu VH (1999) Concentration profiles in shallow turbulent wakes. ASME J Fluids Eng 121(1):34–43. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2822007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cafiero G, Woods A (2016) Experiments on mixing in wakes in shallow water. J Fluid Mech 804:351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mignot E, Cai W, Polanco J, Escauriaza C, Riviere N (2017) Measurement of mass exchange processes and coefficients in a simplified open-channel lateral cavity connected to a main stream. Environ Fluid Mech 17(3):429–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rojas-Arques S, Rubinato M, Nichols A, Shucksmith JD (2018) Cost effective measuring technique to simultaneously quantify 2D velocity fields and depth-averaged solute concentrations in shallow water flows. Flow Meas Instrum 64:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Carmer CF, Rummel AC, Jirka GH (2009) Mass transport in shallow turbulent wake flow by planar concentration analysis technique. J Hydraul Eng 135(4):257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prior EM, O’Donnell FC, Brodbeck C, Runion GB, Shepherd SL (2021) Investigating small unoccupied aerial systems (sUAS) multispectral imagery for total suspended solids and turbidity monitoring in small streams. Int J Remote Sens 42(1):39–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwon S, Shin J, Seo IW, Noh H, Jung SH, You H (2022) Measurement of suspended sediment concentration in open channel flows based on hyperspectral imagery from UAVs. Adv Water Resour 159:104076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shucksmith JD, Boxall JB, Guymer I (2011) Determining longitudinal dispersion coefficients for submerged vegetated flow. Water Resour Res 47(10)

  29. West P, Hart J, Guymer I, Stovin V (2016) Development of a laboratory system and 2D routing analysis to determine solute mixing within aquatic vegetation. In: Hydrodynamic and mass transport at freshwater aquatic interfaces. Springer

  30. Shin J, Seo IW, Baek D (2020) Longitudinal and transverse dispersion coefficients of 2D contaminant transport model for mixing analysis in open channels. J Hydrol 583:124302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shiono K, Feng T (2003) Turbulence measurements of dye concentration and effects of secondary flow on distribution in open channel flows. J Hydraul Eng 129(5):373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sanjou M, Nezu I (2013) Hydrodynamic characteristics and related mass-transfer properties in open-channel flows with rectangular embayment zone. Environ Fluid Mech 13(6):527–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Crimaldi JP (2008) Planar laser induced fluorescence in aqueous flows. Exp Fluids 44(6):851–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Coppeta J, Rogers C (1998) Dual emission laser induced fluorescence for direct planar scalar behavior measurements. Exp Fluids 25(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lou J, Finegan TΜ, Mohsen P, Hatton TA, Laibinis PE (1999) Fluorescence-based thermometry: principles and applications. Rev Anal Chem 18(4):235–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu X, Li L, Hua Z, Tu Q, Yang T, Zhang Y (2019) Flow dynamics and contaminant transport in Y-shaped river channel confluences. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(4):572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gibson C, Schwarz W (1963) Detection of conductivity fluctuations in a turbulent flow field. J Fluid Mech 16(3):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lau YL, Krishnappan BG (1977) Transverse dispersion in rectangular channels. J Hydraul Div 103(10):1173–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nokes RI, Wood IR (1988) Vertical and lateral turbulent dispersion: some experimental results. J Fluid Mech 187:373–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Baek KO, Seo IW, Jeong SJ (2006) Evaluation of dispersion coefficients in meandering channels from transient tracer tests. J Hydraul Eng 132(10):1021–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Briard A, Gostiaux L, Gréa BJ (2020) The turbulent Faraday instability in miscible fluids. J Fluid Mech 883:A57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Seo IW, Park SW, Choi HJ (2009) A study of pollutant mixing and evaluating of dispersion coefficients in laboratory meandering channel. In: Advances in water resources and hydraulic engineering. Springer

  43. Linden PF, Redondo JM (1991) Molecular mixing in Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Part I: global mixing. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 3(5):1269–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kastrinakis EG, Nychas SG (1998) Mixing at high Schmidt numbers in the near wake of a circular cylinder. Chem Eng Sci 53(23):3977–3989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ncube F, Kastrinakis EG, Nychas SG, Lavdakis KE (1991) Drifting behaviour of a conductivity probe. J Hydraul Res 29(5):643–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shen X, Li R, Hodges BR, Feng J, Cai H, Ma X (2019) Experiment and simulation of supersaturated total dissolved gas dissipation: focus on the effect of confluence types. Water Res 155:320–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Park H, Hwang JH (2019) Quantification of vegetation arrangement and its effects on longitudinal dispersion in a channel. Water Resour Res 55(5):4488–4498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lepot M, Aubin JB, Bertrand-Krajewski JL (2013) Accuracy of different sensors for the estimation of pollutant concentrations (total suspended solids, total and dissolved chemical oxygen demand) in wastewater and stormwater. Water Sci Technol 68(2):462–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chu VH, Abdelwahed MST (1990) Shore attachment of buoyant effluent in strong crossflow. J Hydraul Eng 116(2):157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Komori S, Ueda H, Ogino F, Mizushina T (1983) Turbulence structure in stably stratified open-channel flow. J Fluid Mech 130:13–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ueda H, Möller R, Komori S, Mizushina T (1977) Eddy diffusivity near the free surface of open channel flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 20(11):1127–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Schiller EJ, Sayre WW (1975) Vertical temperature profiles in open-channel flow. J Hydraul Div 101(6):749–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Fleury M, Lueck RG (1994) Direct heat flux estimates using a towed vehicle. J Phys Oceanogr 24(4):801–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Freeze B, Smolentsev S, Morley N, Abdou M (2003) Characterization of the effect of Froude number on surface waves and heat transfer in inclined turbulent open channel water flows. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(20):3765–3775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dugdale SJ (2016) A practitioner’s guide to thermal infrared remote sensing of rivers and streams: recent advances, precautions and considerations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 3:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Hetsroni G, Rozenblit R (1994) Heat transfer to a liquid–solid mixture in a flume. Int J Multiph Flow 20(4):671–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Riviere N, Travin G, Perkins RJ (2011) Subcritical open channel flows in four branch intersections. Water Resour Res 47(10)

  58. Mignot E, Bonakdari H, Knothe P, Lipeme Kouyi G, Bessette A, Rivière N, Bertrand-Krajewski JL (2012) Experiments and 3D simulations of flow structures in junctions and their influence on location of flowmeters. Water Sci Technol 66(6):1325–1332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Rutherford JC (1994) River mixing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  60. Graf W, Altinakar MS (2000) Hydraulique fluviale. Ecoulement et phénomènes de transport dans les canaux à géométrie simple. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes

  61. Beltaos S (1980) Transverse mixing tests in natural streams. J Hydraul Div 106(10):1607–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Aghababaei M, Etemad-Shahidi A, Jabbari E, Taghipour M (2017) Estimation of transverse mixing coefficient in straight and meandering streams. Water Resour Manag 31(12):3809–3827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Jin T, Ramos PX, Mignot E, Riviere N, De Mulder T (2023) On the delineation of the flow separation zone in open-channel confluences. Adv Water Resour 180:104525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Shakibainia A, Tabatabai MRM, Zarrati AR (2010) Three-dimensional numerical study of flow structure in channel confluences. Can J Civ Eng 37(5):772–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Breidenthal R (1981) Structure in turbulent mixing layers and wakes using a chemical reaction. J Fluid Mech 109:1–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Yuan S, Tang H, Li K, Xu L, Xiao Y, Gualtieri C, Melville B (2021) Hydrodynamics, sediment transport and morphological features at the confluence between the Yangtze River and the Poyang Lake. Water Resour Res 57(3):e2020WR028284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Constantinescu G (2014) LE of shallow mixing interfaces: a review. Environ Fluid Mech 14:971–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Yuan S, Tang H, Xiao Y, Qiu X, Zhang H, Yu D (2016) Turbulent flow structure at a 90-degree open channel confluence: accounting for the distortion of the shear layer. J Hydro-Environ Res 12:130–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Claire Séhan for her participation to preliminary experiments. Authors are indebted to many colleagues for their invaluable advices concerning different aspects of chemistry: Drs. Bouscharain, Querry, Travin and Profs. de Brauer, Germain and Millet at INSA Lyon, and Profs. Riviere at Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

Funding

This work was supported by the "Institut des Sciences de l'Univers" (INSU) of the French CNRS [Grant Number EC2CO Cytrix 2011-231], by Fédération de Recherche Inge’LySE (FR CNRS 3411) and by OTHU (Field Observatory for Urban Water Management), the RMC Water Agency and Lyon Metropolis. Sébastien Pouchoulin held a doctoral fellowship from Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes. Wei Cai held a M.Sc. fellowship from the China Scolarship Council. This work was performed within EUR H2O’Lyon (ANR-17-EURE-0018) of Université de Lyon (UdL), as part of the program "Investissements d'Avenir” operated by the French National Research Agency (ANR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first draft of the manuscript was written by N.R. and S.P., and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. N.R. and E.M. designed the experimental procedure. S.P. and W.C performed the experimental measurements. All authors contributed to the data analysis. G.L, J.L.C and N.R. led the review of existing measuring techniques. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Riviere.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Measured dimensionless concentration data

Appendix: Measured dimensionless concentration data

See Tables

Table 2 Dimensionless concentrations in the single channel experiments (Fig. 3)

2 and

Table 3 Dimensionless concentrations measured in the confluence experiments (Fig. 5)

3.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riviere, N., Pouchoulin, S., Cai, W. et al. A new pH-based tracing method for flow mixing studies in closed-loop experimental flumes: evaluation in an open-channel confluence. Environ Fluid Mech (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-024-09990-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-024-09990-0

Keywords

Navigation