Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical parametrization of internal seiche amplitude including secondary effects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An internal wave is a propagating disturbance within a stable density-stratified fluid. The internal seiche amplitude is often estimated through theories that describe the amplitude growth based on the Bulk Richardson number (Ri). However, most theoretical formulations neglect secondary effects that may influence the evolution of internal seiches. Since these waves have been pointed out as the most important process of vertical mixing, influencing the biogeochemical fluxes in stratified basins, the wrong estimation may have several impacts on the prediction of the system dynamics. This research paid particular attention to the importance of secondary effects that may play a major role on the basin-scale internal wave amplitude, especially related to the interaction between internal waves and lake boundaries, internal wave depth, and mixing processes due to turbulence. Based on a set of methods, which include auto- and cross-correlations, spectral analysis, and mathematical models, we analyzed the effect of total water depth, wind-resonance, and higher vertical modes on the amplitude growth. We based our analysis on underwater temperature measurements and meteorological data obtained from two small thermally-stratified basins, complemented with numerical simulations. We introduce here a new parametrization which takes into account the total water depth (H), lake length (L), epilimnion thickness (\(h_e\)), as well as the resonance effect. We observed that the rate of amplitude growth decreases compared to linear theory when \(Ri~h_e/L\le 1\). In these cases, we suggests that previous theories overestimate the internal seiche amplitude, neglecting the instabilities generated near the wave crest due to weak stability and wave interactions. However, under shallow thermocline conditions, due to extra pressure in the upper layer, the vertical displacement may be higher than that predicted by the linear theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antenucci JP, Imberger J (2001) Energetics of long internal gravity waves in large lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 46(7):1760–1773. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.7.1760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnon A, Brenner S, Selker JS, Gertman I, Lensky NG (2019) Seasonal dynamics of internal waves governed by stratification stability and wind: analysis of high-resolution observations from the dead sea. Limnol Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhardt J, Kirillin G (2013) Seasonal pattern of rotation-affected internal seiches in a small temperate lake. Limnol Oceanogr 58(4):1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.4.1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boegman L (2009) Currents in stratified water bodies 2: internal waves. Encycl Inland Waters 1:539–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370626-3.00081-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boegman L, Ivey GN (2012) The dynamics of internal wave resonance in periodically forced narrow basins. J Geophys Res Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boegman L, Imberger J, Ivey GN, Antenucci JP (2003) High-frequency internal waves in large stratified lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 48(2):895–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boegman L, Ivey G, Imberger J (2005a) The degeneration of internal waves in lakes with sloping topography. Limnol Oceanogr 50(5):1620–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boegman L, Ivey G, Imberger J (2005b) The energetics of large-scale internal wave degeneration in lakes. J Fluid Mech 531:159–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005003915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouffard D, Ackerman JD, Boegman L (2013) Factors affecting the development and dynamics of hypoxia in a large shallow stratified lake: hourly to seasonal patterns. Water Resour Res 49(5):2380–2394. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouffard D, Zdorovennov RE, Zdorovennova GE, Pasche N, Wüest A, Terzhevik AY (2016) Ice-covered lake onega: effects of radiation on convection and internal waves. Hydrobiologia 780(1):21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2915-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce LC, Jellison R, Imberger J, Melack JM (2008) Effect of benthic boundary layer transport on the productivity of mono lake, california. Saline Syst 4(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-4-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bueno R, Bleninger T (2018) Wind-induced internal seiches in Yossoroca reservoir, PR, Brazil. Rev Bras Recur Hidr. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.231820170203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carmack EC, Wiegand RC, Daley RJ, Gray CB, Jasper S, Pharo CH (1986) Mechanisms influencing the circulation and distribution of water mass in a medium residence-time lake. Limnol Oceanogr 31(2):249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cossu R, Ridgway M, Li J, Chowdhury M, Wells M (2017) Wash-zone dynamics of the thermocline in lake Simcoe, Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 43(4):689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delft3D-FLOW (2014) User manual of delft3d-flow–simulation of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic flows and transport phenomena, including sediments. Version 3.15.34158. Deltares, Delft, Netherlands

  16. Dissanayake P, Hofmann H, Peeters F (2019) Comparison of results from two 3d hydrodynamic models with field data: internal seiches and horizontal currents. Inland Waters 10(1080/20442041):1580079

    Google Scholar 

  17. Flood B, Wells M, Dunlop E, Young J (2020) Internal waves pump waters in and out of a deep coastal embayment of a large lake. Limnol Oceanogr 65(2):205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaudard A, Schwefel R, Vinnå LR, Schmid M, Wüest A, Bouffard D (2017) Optimizing the parameterization of deep mixing and internal seiches in one-dimensional hydrodynamic models: a case study with simstrat v1.3. Geosci Model Dev 10(9):3411–3423. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3411-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gloor M, Wüest A, Imboden D (2000) Dynamics of mixed bottom boundary layers and its implications for diapycnal transport in a stratified, natural water basin. J Geophys Res Oceans 105(C4):8629–8646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goudsmit GH, Burchard H, Peeters F, Wüest A (2002) Application of k-e turbulence models to enclosed basins: the role of internal seiches. J Geophys Res Oceans 107(C12):23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heaps NS, Ramsbottom A (1966) Wind effects on the water in a narrow two-layered lake. Part i. Theoretical analysis. Part ii. Analysis of observations from windermere. Part iii. Application of the theory to windermere. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 259(1102):391–430. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1966.0021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinzel G, Rüdiger A, Schilling R (2002) Spectrum and spectral density estimation by the discrete fourier transform, including a comprehensive list of window functions and some new at-top windows. Max Plank Inst. https://doi.org/10.22027/395068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hingsamer P, Peeters F, Hofmann H (2014) The consequences of internal waves for phytoplankton focusing on the distribution and production of planktothrix rubescens. PloS One 9(8):e104359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Homma H, Nagai T, Shimizu K, Yamazaki H (2016) Early-winter mixing event associated with baroclinic motions in weakly stratified lake biwa. Inland Waters 6(3):364–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Horn D, Imberger J, Ivey G (1998) The degeneration of basin-scale internal waves in lakes. In: 13th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, Monash University, pp 863–866

  26. Horn D, Imberger J, Ivey G (2001) The degeneration of large-scale interfacial gravity waves in lakes. J Fluid Mech 434:181–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hutter K, Wang Y, Chubarenko IP (2011) Physics of lakes, volume 2: lakes as oscillators. In: Advances in geophysical and environmental mechanics and mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19112-1

  28. Imberger J (1998) Physical processes in lakes and oceans, vol 54. American Geophysical Union. https://doi.org/10.1029/CE054

  29. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, et al. (2015) The International thermodynamic equation of seawater–2010: calculation and use of thermodynamic properties. Corrections – 2015

  30. Lemmin U (1987) The structure and dynamics of internal waves in baldeggersee. Limnol Oceanogr 32(1):43–61. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1987.32.1.0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Macdonald RH (1995) Hypolimnetic withdrawl from a shallow, eutrophic lake. Ph. D thesis, University of British Columbia

  32. MacIntyre S, Jellison R (2001) Nutrient fluxes from upwelling and enhanced turbulence at the top of the pycnocline in Mono Lake. Springer, California

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Mortimer C (1979) Strategies for coupling data collection and analysis with dynamic modelling of lake motions. Dev Water Sci 11:183–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5648(08)70395-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mortimer CH (1952) Water movements in lakes during summer stratification: evidence from the distribution of temperature in windermere. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 236(635):355–398. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1952.0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Münnich M, Wüest A, Imboden DM (1992) Observations of the second vertical mode of the internal seiche in an alpine lake. Limnol Oceanogr 37(8):1705–1719. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.8.1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pannard A, Bormans M, Lagadeuc Y (2008) Phytoplankton species turnover controlled by physical forcing at different time scales. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.1139/f07-149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Read JS, Hamilton DP, Jones ID, Muraoka K, Winslow LA, Kroiss R, Wu CH, Gaiser E (2011) Derivation of lake mixing and stratification indices from high-resolution lake buoy data. Environ Model Softw 26(11):1325–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodi W (2017) Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Roget E, Salvadé G, Zamboni F (1997) Internal seiche climatology in a small lake where transversal and second vertical modes are usually observed. Limnol Oceanogr 42(4):663–673. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.4.0663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Roget E, Khimchenko E, Forcat F, Zavialov P (2017) The internal seiche field in the changing south aral sea (2006–2013). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(2):1093. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1093-2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwefel R, Gaudard A, Wüest A, Bouffard D (2016) Effects of climate change on deepwater oxygen and winter mixing in a deep lake (lake geneva): Comparing observational findings and modeling. Water Resour Res 52(11):8811–8826. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shintani T, de la Fuente A, de la Fuente A, Niño Y, Imberger J (2010) Generalizations of the wedderburn number: parameterizing upwelling in stratified lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 55(3):1377–1389. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.3.1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Simpson J, Wiles P, Lincoln B (2011) Internal seiche modes and bottom boundary-layer dissipation in a temperate lake from acoustic measurements. Limnol Oceanogr 56(5):1893–1906. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.5.1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Spigel RH, Imberger J (1980) The classification of mixed-layer dynamics of lakes of small to medium size. J Phys Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010<1104:TCOMLD>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stelling GS, Duinmeijer SA (2003) A staggered conservative scheme for every froude number in rapidly varied shallow water flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43(12):1329–1354. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stevens C, Lawrence G, Hamblin P, Carmack E (1996) Wind forcing of internal waves in a long narrow stratified lake. Dyn Atmos Oceans 24(1–4):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Stevens CL (1999) Internal waves in a small reservoir. J Geophys Res Oceans 104(C7):15777–15788. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stevens CL, Lawrence GA (1997) Estimation of wind-forced internal seiche amplitudes in lakes and reservoirs, with data from British Columbia, Canada. Aquat Sci 59(2):115–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sutherland BR (2010) Internal gravity waves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Sutherland BR (2020) Internal waves in the atmosphere and ocean: instability mechanisms. Fluid mechanics of planets and stars. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  51. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Umlauf L, Lemmin U (2005) Interbasin exchange and mixing in the hypolimnion of a large lake: The role of long internal waves. Limnol Oceanogr 50(5):1601–1611. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2005.50.5.1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Valerio G, Pilotti M, Marti CL, Jr Imberger (2012) The structure of basin-scale internal waves in a stratified lake in response to lake bathymetry and wind spatial and temporal distribution: Lake Iseo, Italy. Limnology and Oceanography 57(3):772–786. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.3.0772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vidal J, Casamitjana X, Colomer J, Serra T (2005) The internal wave field in sau reservoir: Observation and modeling of a third vertical mode. Limnol Oceanogr 50(4):1326–1333. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2005.50.4.1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Watson ER (1903) Internal oscillation in the waters of Loch Ness. Nature 69:174. https://doi.org/10.1038/069174a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nash JD, Alford MH, Kunze E (2005) Estimating internal wave energy fluxes in the ocean. J Atmos Ocean Technol 22(10):1551–1570. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1784.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wüest A, Lorke A (2003) Small-scale hydrodynamics in lakes. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35(1):373–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Yan N, Pawson T (1997) Changes in the crustacean zooplankton community of harp lake, canada, following invasion by bythotrephes cederstroemi. Freshw Biol 37(2):409–425. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00172.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yan N, Strus R (1980) Crustacean zooplankton communities of acidic, metal-contaminated lakes near Sudbury, Ontario. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37(12):2282–2293. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Young JD, Loew ER, Yan ND (2009) Examination of direct daytime predation by coregonus artedi on bythotrephes longimanus in harp lake, ontario, canada: no evidence for the refuge hypothesis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66(3):449–459. https://doi.org/10.1139/F09-006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoas de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. The main authors thank Prof. Andreas Lorke for all the intense and helpful discussions on internal waves during the research stay of RCB at UKL. We also thank Prof. Michael Mannich to provide data from Vossoroca reservoir, and Prof. Maurício Felga Gobbi and Prof. Ailin Ruiz de Zarate Fabregas for discussion on field data results. The main author thanks the editor and the two anonymous reviewers who provided valuable feedback on an early draft of this manuscript. RCB thanks CAPES for the scholarships. TB acknowledges the productivity stipend from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq, Grant No. 308758/2017-0 , call 12/2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael de Carvalho Bueno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Numerical simulations

This appendix contains detailed parameters used to simulate the evolution of basin-scale internal waves in Delft3D. In addition, Tables 1 and 2 presents general data and processed results from all 32 simulated cases, including general parameters of boundary conditions, theoretical results for vertical displacement and degeneration regime.

We used the three-dimensional hydrodynamic model Delft3D-FLOW, which solves the shallow water equations using the hydrostatic assumption [15]. Although Delft3D model may fails to reproduce the internal wave breaking and most of degeneration regimes, it has already been used to describe internal seiche in real lakes and reservoir [16].

The implemented model operated in a horizontal Cartesian grid cells of \(90~{\text {m}}\times 90~{\text {m}}\) and 50 fixed layers, with no heat flux at water surface. For the turbulence closure scheme, vertical eddy diffusivity and viscosity was calculated by a \(k-\epsilon\) model. The coefficients of background vertical and horizontal viscosity and diffusivity were considered as calibration coefficients and were kept fixed during the simulation. Considering the stability condition, specified by the Courant–Friedrichs number, we used a time step of 1 min to simulate approximately 10 days.

Although Delft3D fails to describe most of the degeneration process of BSIW, Fig. 16 highlights the evolution of the internal bore generated after the degeneration of the basin-scale internal wave detected in simulation 23 (Fig. 11b). The degeneration regime evidenced in the simulation matches with theoretical results [25, 26].

Table 1 Summary of collected data from simulated cases \(h_e\) and H indicate the epilimnion and total water depth, respectively
Fig. 16
figure 16

Internal bore generated as a result of the degeneration process of basin-scale internal wave (Simulation: Run 23)

Table 2 Summary of processed results from simulated cases

Harp lake

For time being this section highlights only one period of basin-scale internal wave activity in Harp Lake. Other periods are summarized in the supplementary material. For Harp Lake, the basin-scale internal waves were excited in summer and spring in the North Hemisphere. The highlighted sub-period is comprised between September 16 and October 20, 2013.

We selected the period from 25th of September to 4th of October since it presented low Ri due to the strong wind events, with mean wind speed \(> 3.5~{\text {m/s}}\) and peaks that reached almost \(6~{\text {m/s}}\). Homogeneous wind events presented duration of approximately \(11~{\text {h}}\) blowing \(169~^\circ\) North. The thermal stratification was constant during the period, \(\Delta T \approx 15~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\). The strong wind events decreased the Ri from \(10^6\) to \(10^3\), which lead to the formation of basin-scale internal waves. According to the criteria established by [44], the reduction of Ri value leads to a lake regime of internal seiche dominance. Although it is not a full proof of their existence, this theory gives indication of their generation.

Considering the analyzed period, oscillatory motion was observed mainly in the \(8~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherm, located approximately \(1~{\text {m}}\) below the mean thermocline depth (\(\approx 7~{\text {m}}\) above the water surface). The first event occurred between September 28 and 30, whilst the second and stronger one was detected in the last five days of the analyzed sub-period, from 1st to 5th of October, 2013. The first one presents mean wind intensity of \(2.7~{\text {m/s}}\), whereas the second one a mean wind speed of \(3.5~{\text {m/s}}\) (Fig. 17a). Both periods present low Ri and, according to [44], were susceptible to internal seiche formations. Although the Ri does not account the wind direction to analyze the excitation of internal waves, the period presents homogeneous wind events, with mean wind direction to \(120^\circ\) and \(270^\circ\) North, respectively. Stronger wind events provided higher oscillations, with vertical displacement reaching \(1.2~{\text {m}}\), whilst the first period presented maximum vertical displacement of \(0.6~{\text {m}}\).

Fig. 17
figure 17

Thermal and wind speed condition in Harp Lake. a Isotherms time-series in height above the bottom (h.a.b.). b Wind speed time series (Harp Lake; 25/09–04/10)

Figure 18a shows results of the multi-layer hydrostatic linear model with free surface and the power spectral density of isotherms time series. The power spectral density of \(8~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherm shows two prominent peaks (Fig. 18a). Peak (I) and (II) are above the mean red noise spectrum, presenting period of \(5~{\text {h}}~30\) and \(4~{\text {h}}~30\), respectively. Both periods are close and compatible with the first two vertical modes. Both modes showed similar results since the thermal structure of Harp Lake during this period of analysis is characterized by a thin metalimnion (Fig. 18c).

The \(4~{\text {h}}~30\) peak (Fig. 18a; peak I), has lower spectral energy compared to the peak (II), that has periodicity of \(5~{\text {h}}~30\). It indicates that the \(4~{\text {h}}~30\) fluctuation occurred between September 28 and 30 due to wind event of \(2.7~{\text {m/s}}\). The phase analysis indicates that the \(8~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) and \(12~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherms propagates out-of-phase (Fig. 18b), suggesting the occurrence of a higher baroclinic internal wave. The out-of-phase structure may also be observed through Fig. 17b from 1st to 5th of October. However, the detection of the out-of-phase structure is harder for the first period, since the internal seiche amplitude is lower. In both periods the V2H1 mode was more pronounced below the thermocline, in the \(8~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherm, and barely detectable at the \(10~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherm.

Fig. 18
figure 18

a Power spectral density of the isotherms of \(12~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) and \(8~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\). Dashed lines show the mean red noise spectrum for the time series, indicating significant peaks at a \(95\%\) confidence level. b spectral phase analyses considering just coherence higher than \(80\%\) (Harp Lake; 25/09–05/10), c Vertical temperature profile obtained from Harp Lake in 2nd of October 2013 at 5 a.m., d Zoom-in view of the temperature profile with a second profile \(2~{\text {h}}\) late, which is approximately half of the internal seiche period. At \(22~{\text {m}}\) above the bottom the water becomes warmer, which leads to a erosion of the \(12~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherm due to internal seiche passage. However, \(2~{\text {m}}\) bellow that point, the water becomes colder due to the elevation of the \(8~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherm, that was caused by the oscillation of the second interface, clearly out-of-phase with the \(12~^{\circ }{\text {C}}\) isotherm. e a sketch of the V2 mode is presented in (d)

The second vertical mode affects the vertical temperature profile as shown in Fig. 18d, generating vertical displacement in opposite directions. This motion occurs repeatedly, as illustrated schematically in Fig. 18e, until the complete internal seiche dissipation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Carvalho Bueno, R., Bleninger, T., Yao, H. et al. An empirical parametrization of internal seiche amplitude including secondary effects. Environ Fluid Mech 21, 209–237 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09767-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09767-1

Keywords

Navigation