This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
Congenial conversations are generally agreeable discussions in which participants focus on politeness and privacy and avoid fault lines and conflict. Collegial conversations are characterized by deep collaboration where participants display an inquiry habit of mind, use relevant data, and develop relationships based on trust and mutual respect.
References
Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Ross, N., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2022). Opening up the black box: Teacher competence, instructional quality, and students’ learning progress. Learning and Instruction, 79, 101600.
Charalambous, C. Y., Hill, H. C., Chin, M. J., & McGinn, D. (2020). Mathematical content knowledge and knowledge for teaching: Exploring their distinguishability and contribution to student learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(6), 579–613.
Guberman, D., & Leikin, R. (2021). Challenging mathematics teachers to implement open-ended problem solving: The interplay between teachers’ practices and their views. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(8), 1165–1184.
König, J., Santagata, R., Scheiner, T., Adleff, A. K., Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Teacher noticing: A systematic literature review of conceptualizations, research designs, and findings on learning to notice. Educational Research Review, 36, 100453.
Murray, E., Durkin, K., Chao, T., Star, J. R., & Vig, R. (2018). Exploring connections between content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, and the opportunities to learn mathematics: Findings from the TEDS-M Dataset. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(1), 4–22.
Murray, E., Kim, Y, & DiNapoli, J. (in preparation). Knowledge construction in professional learning communities: Advancements in frame analysis.
Schoenfeld, A., Fink, H., Sayavedra, A., Weltman, A., & Zuñiga-Ruiz, S. (2023a). Mathematics teaching on target: A guide to teaching for robust understanding at all grade levels. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376903.
Schoenfeld, A., Fink, H., Zuñiga-Ruiz, S., Huang, S., Wei, X., & Chirinda, B. (2023b). Helping students become powerful mathematics thinkers: Case studies of teaching for robust understanding. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003375197.
Star, J. R. (2016). Improve math teaching with incremental improvements. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(7), 58–62.
Suppa, S., DiNapoli, J., Thanheiser, E., Tobias, J. M., & Yeo, S. (2020). The impact of high-stakes accountability on teachers’ use of standards-based mathematics. AERA Open, 6(2), 1–16.
van Es, E. A., Hand, V., Agarwal, P., & Sandoval, C. (2022). Multidimensional noticing for equity: Theorizing mathematics teachers’ systems of noticing to disrupt inequities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(2), 114–132.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author is one of the principal investigators for the NSF-funded grant (#1908309), AIM-TRU, that has produced a repository of secondary mathematics video case studies and a corresponding professional development model that is anchored in the Teaching for Robust Understanding framework.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, E. Book review: Alan Schoenfeld, Heather Fink, Sandra Zuñiga-Ruiz, Siqi Huang, Xinyu Wei, and Brantina Chirinda (2023) Helping students become powerful thinkers: case studies of teaching for robust understanding. Educ Stud Math (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10312-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10312-w