Abstract
This study is the first to examine the associations between the occurrence, frequency, and adaptivity of children’s subtraction by addition strategy use (SBA; e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 346 + 54 = 400, 400 + 300 = 700, 700 + 12 = 712, and 54 + 300 + 12 = 366) and their underlying conceptual knowledge. Specifically, we focused on two rarely studied components of conceptual knowledge: children’s knowledge of the addition/subtraction complement principle (i.e., if a + b = c, then c − b = a and c − a = b) and their knowledge of different conceptual subtraction models (i.e., understanding that subtraction can be conceived not only as “taking away” but also as “determining the difference”). SBA occurrence was examined using a variability on demand task, in which children had to use multiple strategies to solve a subtraction. SBA frequency and strategy adaptivity were investigated with a task in which children could freely choose between SBA and direct subtraction (e.g., 712 − 346 = ?; 712 − 300 = 412, 412 − 40 = 372, and 372 − 6 = 366) to solve 15 subtractions. We measured both children’s knowledge of the addition/subtraction complement principle, and whether they understood subtraction also as “determining the difference.” SBA occurrence and frequency were not related to conceptual knowledge. However, strategy adaptivity was related to children’s knowledge of the addition/subtraction complement principle. Our findings highlight the importance of attention to conceptual knowledge when teaching multi-digit subtraction and expand the literature about the relation between procedural and conceptual knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available on request from the authors.
References
Baroody, A. J. (1999). Children’s relational knowledge of addition and subtraction. Cognition and Instruction, 17(2), 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI170201
Baroody, A. J., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Young children’s understanding and application of subtraction-related principles: Introduction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(1–2), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802583873
Blöte, A. W., Van Der Burg, E., & Klein, A. S. (2001). Students’ flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems: Instruction effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.627
Canobi, K. H. (2005). Children’s profiles of addition and subtraction understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(3), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.001
Canobi, K. H. (2009). Concept-procedure interactions in children’s addition and subtraction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.008
Ching, B. H., & Nunes, T. (2017). The importance of additive reasoning in children’s mathematical achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 477–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000154
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics.
De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1989). Teaching word problems in the primary school: What research has to say to the teacher. In B. Greer & G. Mulhern (Eds.), New developments in teaching mathematics (pp. 85–106). Routledge.
De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). An empirical test of the impact of primitive intuitive models of operations on solving word problems with a multiplicative structure. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(96)00004-7
Heinze, A., Marschick, F., & Lipowsky, F. (2009). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers: Adaptive strategy use and the influence of instruction in German third grade. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 41(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0205-5
Hickendorff, M. (2020). Fourth graders’ adaptive strategy use in solving multidigit subtraction problems. Learning and Instruction, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101311
Klein, A. S., Beishuizen, M., & Treffers, A. (1998). The empty number line in Dutch second grades: Realistic versus gradual program design. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.29.4.0443
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
Paliwal, V., & Baroody, A. J. (2020). Fostering the learning of subtraction concepts and the subtraction-as-addition reasoning strategy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 51, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.05.008
Prather, R. W., & Alibali, M. W. (2009). The development of arithmetic principle knowledge: How do we know what learners know? Developmental Review, 29(4), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.09.001
Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153–196). Academic Press.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
Selter, C. (2001). Addition and subtraction of three-digit numbers: German elementary children’s success, methods and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014521221809
Selter, C., Prediger, S., Nührenbörger, M., & Hußmann, S. (2012). Taking away and determining the difference-a longitudinal perspective on two models of subtraction and the inverse relation to addition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9305-6
Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.71
Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Acquisition and use of shortcut strategies by traditionally schooled children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9155-z
Torbeyns, J., Peters, G., De Smedt, B., & Ghesquière, P. (2016). Children’s understanding of the addition/subtraction complement principle. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12113
Torbeyns, J., Peters, G., De Smedt, B., Ghesquière, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2018). Subtraction by addition strategy use in children of varying mathematical achievement level: A choice/no-choice study. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(1), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v4i1.77
Van Der Auwera, S., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). Adults’ use of subtraction by addition and its association with executive functions. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7271
Van Der Auwera, S., Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Verguts, G., & Verschaffel, L. (2022). The remarkably frequent, efficient, and adaptive use of the subtraction by addition strategy: A choice/no-choice study in fourth- to sixth-graders with varying mathematical achievement levels. Learning and Individual Differences, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102107
Verschaffel, L., De Smedt, B., Van Der Auwera, S., & Torbeyns, J. (2021). Subtraction by addition: a remarkably natural and clever way to subtract? In W. Fias & A. Henik (Eds.), Heterogeneous Contributions to Numerical Cognition: Learning and Education in Mathematical Cognition (pp. 117–141). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817414-2.00005-1.
Vicente, S., Verschaffel, L., Sánchez, R., & Múñez, D. (2022). Arithmetic word problem solving. Analysis of Singaporean and Spanish textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111(3), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10169-x
Wittmann, E. C. (2021). Connecting mathematics and mathematics education: Collected papers on mathematics education as a design science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61570-3
Yip, S.-K.E., Wong, T.-Y.T., & Kwan, K.-T. (2022). The relation between complement understanding and computational skills: A random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001481
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Yarissa Broos for her assistance in the data collection.
Funding
This research was supported by grant G0C7217N “Subtraction by addition. A most efficient strategy for solving symbolic subtraction problems?” from the Research Foundation-Flanders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Der Auwera, S., De Smedt, B., Torbeyns, J. et al. Children’s subtraction by addition strategy use and their subtraction-related conceptual knowledge. Educ Stud Math 115, 35–50 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10276-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10276-3