References
Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in US and Chinese students’ solving of process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 309–340.
Cai, J., & Cifarelli, V. (2004). Thinking mathematically by Chinese learners: A cross-national comparative perspective. In L. Fan (Ed.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 71–106). World Scientific.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education (1916). In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 9 (pp. 1899–1924). Southern Illinois University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2015). How to improve thinking. In: R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 80–91). Routledge.
National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Program for international student assessment. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/overview.asp. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
Niss, M. A. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagatsis, & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education - Athens, Hellas 3-4-5 January 2003 (pp. 116–124). Hellenic Mathematical Society.
OECD. (n.d.). What is PISA? https://www.oecd.org/pisa/#. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.
OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. OECD Publishing.
Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 39(1), 1–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23087298
Seiger-Ehrenberg, S. (1985). Concept development. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resources book for teaching thinking (pp. 161–165). ASCD.
Strauss, V. (2019). China is No. 1 on PISA — But here’s why its test scores are hard to believe. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/12/04/china-is-no-pisa-heres-why-its-test-scores-are-hard-believe/. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.
Xu, B. (2013). Research on core competency in school mathematics. Global Education, 42(6), 67–74.
Xu, B., Zhu, Y., & Lu, X. (Eds.). (2021). Beyond Shanghai and PISA. Cognitive and non-cognitive competencies of Chinese students in mathematics. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Funding
This paper was supported by the Social Science Foundation of Guangdong, China (number GD22XJY05).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Z., Larbi, F.O. Deciphering the cognitive and non-cognitive competencies of Chinese students’ mathematics through a critical lens of PISA. Educ Stud Math 113, 519–528 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10210-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10210-7