Skip to main content
Log in

Deciphering the cognitive and non-cognitive competencies of Chinese students’ mathematics through a critical lens of PISA

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in US and Chinese students’ solving of process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 309–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Cifarelli, V. (2004). Thinking mathematically by Chinese learners: A cross-national comparative perspective. In L. Fan (Ed.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 71–106). World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education (1916). In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 9 (pp. 1899–1924). Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2015). How to improve thinking. In: R. Wegerif, L. Li, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 80–91). Routledge.

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Program for international student assessmenthttps://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/overview.asp. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

  • Niss, M. A. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagatsis, & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education - Athens, Hellas 3-4-5 January 2003 (pp. 116–124). Hellenic Mathematical Society.

  • OECD. (n.d.). What is PISA? https://www.oecd.org/pisa/#. Accessed 2 Dec 2022.

  • OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. OECD Publishing.

  • Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-), 39(1), 1–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23087298

  • Seiger-Ehrenberg, S. (1985). Concept development. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resources book for teaching thinking (pp. 161–165). ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, V. (2019). China is No. 1 on PISA — But here’s why its test scores are hard to believe. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/12/04/china-is-no-pisa-heres-why-its-test-scores-are-hard-believe/. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

  • Xu, B. (2013). Research on core competency in school mathematics. Global Education, 42(6), 67–74.

  • Xu, B., Zhu, Y., & Lu, X. (Eds.). (2021). Beyond Shanghai and PISA. Cognitive and non-cognitive competencies of Chinese students in mathematics. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Download references

Funding

This paper was supported by the Social Science Foundation of Guangdong, China (number GD22XJY05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Okai Larbi.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Larbi, F.O. Deciphering the cognitive and non-cognitive competencies of Chinese students’ mathematics through a critical lens of PISA. Educ Stud Math 113, 519–528 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10210-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10210-7

Navigation