This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w
Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701
Brown, K., & Cole, M. (2001). A utopian methodology as a tool for cultural and critical psychologies: Toward a positive critical theory. In M. J. Packer & M. B. Tappan (Eds.), Cultural and critical perspectives on human development (pp. 41–65). State University of New York Press.
Duijzer, C., Shayan, S., Bakker, A., Van der Schaaf, M. F., & Abrahamson, D. (2017). Touchscreen tablets: Coordinating action and perception for mathematical cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 144. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00144
Hegel, G. W. F. (1966). Who thinks abstractly? In W. Kaufmann (Ed.), Hegel: Texts and commentary (pp. 114–118). Anchor Books.
Ilyenkov, E. (2012). Dialectics of the ideal (2009). Historical Materialism, 20(2), 149–193. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341248
Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133–150.
Nemirovsky, R., Kelton, M. L., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Playing mathematical instruments: Emerging perceptuomotor integration with an interactive mathematics exhibit. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 372–415. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.2.0372
Stetsenko, A. (2020). Research and activist projects of resistance: The ethical-political foundations for a transformative ethico-onto-epistemology. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 26, 100222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.04.002
Test, D. W., Fowler, C. H., Wood, W. M., Brewer, D. M., & Eddy, S. (2005). A conceptual framework of self-advocacy for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 26(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260010601
Walker, C. (1990). Feminist literary criticism and the author. Critical Inquiry, 16(3), 551–571. https://doi.org/10.1086/448546
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shvarts, A. Book Review: Transforming mathematics education: from embodied experiences to an ethical commitment. Luis Radford (2021) The theory of objectification: a Vygotskian perspective on knowing and becoming in mathematics teaching and learning. Educ Stud Math 109, 677–686 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10095-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10095-4