Correction to: Educational Studies in Mathematics (2019) 102(3):435–456
Table 3’s caption should be replaced by “Percentage of assignments inviting mathematical thinking in regular and pilot national examinations for the 5- and 6-year pre-higher education streams.”
The caption was “Percentage of credit points of assignments inviting mathematical thinking in regular and pilot national examinations for the 5- and 6-year pre-higher education streams”.
However, the “of credit points” is somewhat confusing, as one assignment usually involves multiple credit points. Therefore, there is a difference between the number of assignments involved, and the number of credit points involved. As the Table concerns the former, this correction is worth making.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09905-7
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drijvers, P., Kodde-Buitenhuis, H. & Doorman, M. Correction to: Assessing mathematical thinking as part of curriculum reform in the Netherlands. Educ Stud Math 107, 425 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10061-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10061-0