Abstract
Teachers whose mathematical meanings support understanding across different contexts are likely to convey them in productive ways for coherent student learning. This exploratory study sought to elicit 67 secondary mathematics pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) meanings for quadratics with growing pattern creation and multiple translation tasks. A framework for categorizing their patterns, in terms of structural correspondence to quadratic equation forms, is shared. PSTs’ translations and explanations were analyzed using an existing framework for representational fluency. Evidence was found for some PSTs applying prior productive meanings to an unfamiliar context and others discovering new meanings. It was found that some PSTs were not able to draw on their prior knowledge of quadratic functions successfully, and possible reasons for this are explored. Successful figural pattern creation was found to be associated with higher representational fluency. Seven PSTs were also interviewed to probe their cognitive and affective experiences with a “new” type of quadratics task; several described “aha” moments and used emotional languages like “horror” and “delight”. Implications for learning to teach quadratic functions, creative visualization tasks and future research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afamasaga-Fuata'i, K. (2005). Rates of change and an iterative conception of quadratics. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Research, theory, and practice (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 65–72). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). “Rising to the challenge”: Using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0069-5
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241.
Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2017). Secondary mathematics teachers’ meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 168–193.
Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dörfler, W. (2008). En route from patterns to algebra: Comments and reflections. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0071-y
Dweck, C. S. (2010). Mindsets and equitable education. Principal Leadership, 10(5), 26–29.
Ellis, A. B. (2011). Generalizing-promoting actions: How classroom collaborations can support students’ mathematical generalizations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(4), 308–345.
Ellis, A. B., & Grinstead, P. (2008). Hidden lessons: How a focus on slope-like properties of quadratic functions encouraged unexpected generalizations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(4), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.11.002
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Dordecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
Fonger, N. L. (2019). Meaningfulness in representational fluency: An analytic lens for students’ creations, interpretations, and connections. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.10.003
Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9249-3
Graf, E. A., Fife, J. H., Howell, H., & Marquez, E. (2018). The development of a quadratic functions learning progression and associated task shells ETS Research Report Series (pp. 1–28). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Hershkowitz, R., Arcavi, A., & Bruckheimer, M. (2001). Reflections on the status and nature of visual reasoning - The case of the matches. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390010010917
Hodgen, J., Küchemann, D., & Brown, M. (2010). Textbooks for the teaching of algebra in lower secondary school: Are they informed by research? PEDAGOGIES, 5(3), 187–201.
Kajander, A. (2018). Learning algebra with models and reasoning. In A. Kajander, J. Holm, & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning secondary school mathematics: Canadian perspectives in an international context (pp. 561–569). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., Borko, H., Roberts, S., & Schneider, C. (2011). Professional development to support students’ algebraic reasoning: An example from the problem-solving cycle model. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization (pp. 429–452). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64.
Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., Rhodehamel, B., & Diamond, J. (2012). Using student reasoning to inform the development of conceptual learning goals: The case of quadratic functions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14(2), 85–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.656362
Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. In D. Tirosh (Ed.), Forms of mathematical knowledge: Learning and teaching with understanding (pp. 135–161). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
McCallum, W. (2018). Excavating school mathematics. In N. H. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 87–101). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Aspects of understanding: On multiple perspectives and representations of linear functions and connections among them. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & E. Fennema (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions (pp. 69–100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nathan, M. J., & Kim, S. (2007). Pattern generalization with graphs and words: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of middle school students’ representational fluency. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701360886
Olsher, S., & Hershkowitz, R. (2015). Visual strategy and algebraic expression: Two sides of the same problem? Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematics), 25(2), 503–506.
Orton, J., Orton, A., & Roper, T. (1999). Pictorial and practical contexts and the perception of pattern. In A. Orton (Ed.), Pattern in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 121–136). London, UK: Redwood Books Ltd.
Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: Emergence from psychology. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Presmeg, N. (2014). Contemplating visualization as an epistemological learning tool in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(1), 151–157.
Radford, L. (2010). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800903569741
Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3), 297–328.
Rivera, F. D., & Becker, J. R. (2016). Middle school students’ patterning performance on semi-free generalization tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 53–69.
Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1993). Toward a common research perspective. In T. A. Romberg, T. P. Carpenter, & E. Fennema (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions (pp. 1–9). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwartz, J., & Yerushalmy, M. (1992). Getting students to function in and with algebra. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy. MAA Notes (vol. 25, pp. 261–289). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.
Shriki, A. (2010). Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 159–179.
Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. L. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133–160). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
Sullivan, P., Borcek, C., Walker, N., & Rennie, M. (2016). Exploring a structure for mathematics lessons that initiate learning by activating cognition on challenging tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.12.002
Suominen, A. L. (2018). Abstract algebra and secondary school mathematics connections as discussed by mathematicians and mathematics educators. In N. H. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 149–173). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task-based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 217–237.
Thompson, P. W. (2015). Researching mathematical meanings for meaning. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 435–461). New York, NY: Routledge.
Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundational ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 421–456). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Vale, I., Pimentel, T., & Barbosa, A. (2018). The power of seeing in problem solving and creativity: an issue under discussion. In N. Amado, S. Carreira, & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving (pp. 243–272). Cham: Springer.
Wilkie, K. J. (2016). Students’ use of variables and multiple representations in generalizing functional relationships prior to secondary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(3), 333–361.
Wilkie, K. J. (2019). Investigating secondary students’ generalization, graphing, and construction of figural patterns for making sense of quadratic functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.005
Wilkie, K. J., & Clarke, D. M. (2015). Pathways to professional growth: Investigating upper primary school teachers’ perspectives on learning to teach algebra. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 87–118.
Zazkis, R., Dubinsky, E., & Dautermann, J. (1996). Coordinating visual and analytic strategies: A study of students’ understanding of the group D 4. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 435–457.
Zbiek, R. M., & Heid, M. K. (2018). Making connections from the secondary classroom to the abstract algebra course: A mathematical activity approach. In N. H. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 189–209). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 23 kb)
Appendix: Quadratics tasks used in the study
Appendix: Quadratics tasks used in the study
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkie, K.J. Seeing quadratics in a new light: secondary mathematics pre-service teachers’ creation of figural growing patterns. Educ Stud Math 106, 91–116 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09997-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09997-6