Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: an enigma in search of an explanation

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finnish students’ success on all three content domains of each of the four cycles of the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has created much international interest. It has also prompted Finnish academics to offer systemic explanations typically linked to the structural qualities of Finnish schooling and teacher education. Less well-known has been the modest mathematics performance of Finnish grade 8 students on the two Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) in which Finland has participated, which, when compared with its PISA successes, has created something of an enigma. In this paper, we attempt to shed light on this enigma through analyses of Finnish mathematics classroom practice that draw on two extant data sets—interviews with Finnish teacher educators and video-recordings of sequences of lessons taught on standard topics. Due to the international interest in Finnish PISA success, the analyses focus primarily on the resonance between classroom practice and the mathematical literacy component of the PISA assessment framework. The analyses indicate that Finnish mathematics didactics are more likely to explain the modest TIMSS achievements than PISA successes and allude to several factors thought to be unique to the Finns, which, unrelated to mathematics teaching practices, may be contributory to the repeated Finnish PISA successes. Some implications for policy-borrowing are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Percent (=hundredth)

References

  • Adams, R. J. (2003). Response to ‘Cautions on OECD’s recent educational survey (PISA)’. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. (2007). Negotiating meaning in cross-national studies of mathematics teaching: Kissing frogs to find princes. Comparative Education, 43(4), 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the west. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, A. (2005). Introduction: The construction of a learning society. In A. Antikainen (Ed.), Transforming a learning society: The case of Finland (pp. 5–21). Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askew, M., Hodgen, J., Hossain, S., & Bretscher, N. (2010). Values and variables: Mathematics education in high-performing countries. London: Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astala, K., Kivelä, S. K., Koskela, P., Martio, O., Näätänen, M., & Tarvainen, K. (2006). The PISA survey tells only a partial truth of Finnish children’s mathematical skills. Matilde, 29, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, I., Klette, K., Mýrdal, S., Schnack, K., & Simola, A. (2006). Changes in Nordic teaching practices: From individualised teaching to the teaching of individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50, 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2013). Contingent conceptions of accomplished practice: The cultural specificity of discourse in and about the mathematics classroom. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fladmoe, A. (2012). The nature of public opinion on education in Norway, Sweden and Finland—measuring the degree of political polarization at the mass level. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(5), 457–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halinen, I., & Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: The case of Finland. Prospects, 38(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannula, M. (2007). Finnish research on affect in mathematics: Blended theories, mixed methods and some findings. ZDM, 39(3), 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannula, M., Kaasila, R., Pehkonen, E., & Laine, A. (2007). Elementary education students’ memories of mathematics in family context. In J. Woo, H. Lew, K. Park & D. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 1–8). Seoul: PME.

  • Hausstätter, R., & Takala, M. (2011). Can special education make a difference? Exploring the differences of special educational systems between Finland and Norway in relation to the PISA results. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 13(4), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautamäki, J., Laaksonen, S., & Scheinin, P. (2008). Level and balance of achievement. In J. Hautamäki, E. Harjunen, H. Airi, T. Karjalainen, S. Kupiainen, S. Laaksonen, J. Lavonen, E. Pehkonen, P. Rantanen, & P. Scheinin (Eds.), PISA 2006 Finland—analyses, reflections and explanations (pp. 36–49). Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmi, K., Lepik, M., & Viholainen, A. (2013). Analysing proof-related competences in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish mathematics curricula—towards a framework of developmental proof. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Guo, B., Kim, Y., & Sherraden, M. (2010). Parental income, assets, borrowing constraints and children’s post-secondary education. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(4), 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., Bishop, A., Peck, R., & Elsworth, G. (2004). Investigation of effective mathematics teaching and learning in Australian secondary schools. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itkonen, T., & Jahnukainen, M. (2007). An analysis of accountability policies in Finland and the United States. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jyrhämä, R., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Byman, R., Maaranen, K., Toom, A., et al. (2008). The appreciation and realisation of research-based teacher education: Finnish students’ experiences of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karhunen, J., & Keloharju, M. (2001). Shareownership in Finland 2000. Liiketaloudellinen Aikakauskirja (The Finnish Journal of Business Economics), 2, 188–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keloharju, M., Knupfer, S., & Rantapuska, E. (2012). Mutual fund and share ownership in Finland. Liiketaloudellinen Aikakauskirja, 2012(2), 178–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Sherraden, M. (2011). Do parental assets matter for children’s educational attainment?: Evidence from mediation tests. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(6), 969–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivirauma, J., & Ruoho, K. (2007). Excellence through special education? Lessons from the Finnish school reform. International Review of Education, 53, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaernsli, M., & Molander, B.-O. (2003). Scientific literacy: Content knowledge and process skills. In S. Lie, P. Linnakylä, & A. Roe (Eds.), Northern lights on PISA. Unity and diversity in the Nordic countries in PISA 2000 (pp. 63–70). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo, Department of Teacher Education and School Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J., Linnanmäki, K., & Aunio, P. (2012). Language and mathematical performance: A comparison of lower secondary school students with different level of mathematical skills. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krokfors, L., Kynäslahti, H., Stenberg, K., Toom, A., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., et al. (2011). Investigating Finnish teacher educators’ views on research-based teacher education. Teaching Education, 22(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupari, P. (2004). Recent developments in Finnish mathematics education. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 9, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., & Karjalainen, T. (2009). The Finnish education system and PISA. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki and the Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laukkanen, R. (2008). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. In N. Soguel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 305–324). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, S., Linnakylä, P., & Roe, A. (2003). Northern lights on PISA. In S. Lie, P. Linnakylä, & A. Roe (Eds.), Northern Lights on PISA: Unity and diversity in the Nordic countries in PISA 2000 (pp. 7–20). Oslo, Norway: Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnakylä, P. (2002). Reading in Finland. In C. Papanastasiou & V. Froese (Eds.), Reading literacy in 14 countries. Nicosia, Cyprus: University of Cyprus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martio, O. (2009). Long term effects in learning mathematics in Finland—curriculum changes and calculators. The Teaching of Mathematics, 12(2), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey and Company. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O’Connor, K. M., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report. Boston: Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H. (2012). The societal factors contributing to education and schooling in Finland. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 19–38). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H., & Jakku-Sihvonen, R. (2006). Research-based teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland (pp. 31–50). Turku, Finland: Finnish Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, E., & Metsämuuronen, J. (2010). Miten Matematiikan Kehittyvät?: Matematiikan oppimistulokset peruskoulun viidennen vuosiluokan jälkeen vuonna 2008. [How does mathematics develop? The mathematical learning of fifth grade students in 2008]. Helsinki, Finland: Edita Prima Oy.

  • Norris, N., Asplund, R., MacDonald, B., Schostak, J., & Zamorski, B. (1996). An independent evaluation of comprehensive curriculum reform in Finland. Helsinki, Finland: National Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD PISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD PISA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehkonen, E. (2009). How Finns learn mathematics: What is the influence of 25 years of research in mathematics education? In M. Lepis (Ed.), Teaching mathematics: Retrospectives and perspectives (pp. 71–101). Tallinn, Estonia: Institute of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tallinn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poikolainen, J. (2012). A case study of parents’ school choice strategies in a Finnish urban context. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prais, S. J. (2003). Cautions on OECD’s recent educational survey. Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 139–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinikainen, P. (2012). Amazing PISA results in Finnish comprehensive schools. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (pp. 3–18). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryve, A., Hemmi, K., & Börjesson, M. (2011). Discourses about school-based mathematics teacher education in Finland and Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(2),1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, H. (2009). Responding to diversity and striving for excellence: The case of Finland. Prospects, 39(3), 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (2007). Can competencies assessed by PISA be considered the fundamental school knowledge 15-year-olds should possess? Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, A. (2009). Securing quality and equity in education: Lessons from PISA. Prospects, 39(3), 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiel, G., Perkins, R., Close, S., & Oldham, E. (2007). PISA mathematics: A teacher’s guide. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41, 455–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarvainen, K., & Kivelä, S. K. (2006). Severe shortcomings in Finnish mathematics skills. Matilde, 29, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toom, A., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., Stenberg, K., et al. (2010). Experiences of a research-based approach to teacher education: Suggestions for future policies. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tramonte, L., & Willms, J. D. (2010). Cultural capital and its effects on education outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 200–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuovinen, J. (2008). Learning the craft of teaching and learning from world's best practice. The case of Finland. In D. McInerney & A. Liem (Eds.), Teaching and learning: International best practice (pp. 51–77). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi, J. (2004). The system and how does it work: Some curricular and pedagogical characteristics of the Finnish comprehensive school. Education Journal, 32, 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Välijärvi, J., Linnakylä, P., Kupari, P., Reinikainen, P., & Arffman, I. (2002). The Finnish success in PISA—and some reasons behind it. Jyväskylä, Finland: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilenius-Tuohimaa, P. M., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vislie, L. (2003). From integration to inclusion: Focusing global trends and changes in the western European societies. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I., Hansen, S.-E., Kansanen, P., & Bjorkvist, O. (2005). Teacher education for research-based practice in expanded roles: Finland’s experience. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(5), 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2013). Meta-rules of discursive practice in mathematics classrooms from Seoul, Shanghai and Tokyo. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research reported in this paper was made possible by grants from the European Union, Socrates Action 6.1 programme (2002–5048) and the Swedish Research Council (2007–3961).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mälardalens högskola, Västerås, Sweden

    Paul Andrews, Andreas Ryve & Kirsti Hemmi

  2. Stockholms universitet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Judy Sayers

Authors
  1. Paul Andrews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Ryve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kirsti Hemmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Judy Sayers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Andrews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrews, P., Ryve, A., Hemmi, K. et al. PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: an enigma in search of an explanation. Educ Stud Math 87, 7–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9545-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9545-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation