Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Redirecting, progressing, and focusing actions—a framework for describing how teachers use students’ comments to work with mathematics

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to describe and analyze teachers’ orchestrating of classroom discourse, detailed descriptions of teachers’ comments and questions are critical. The purpose of this article is to suggest new concepts that enable us to describe in detail how teachers use or do not use students’ comments to work with the mathematical content. Five teachers from upper primary school (grades five to seven, students aged 10 to 13) were studied. Beginning with the analysis of a pattern where the teacher gives a confirmation followed by a question that indicates a rejection, their practices form the basis for the development of 13 categories of teacher comments. These categories are then grouped into redirecting, progressing, and focusing actions. The categories and their groupings shed light on tools and techniques which these teachers use to make student strategies visible, to make students justify, apply and assess, to ensure progress towards a conclusion, or to redirect the students into alternative approaches. These findings can help us develop in the direction of a more profound understanding of how communication affects learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002). Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Ball, D. L. (2001). Teaching, with respect to mathematics and students. In T. L. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 11–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Brendefur, J., & Frykholm, J. (2000). Promoting mathematical communication in the classroom: two preservice teachers’ conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(2), 125–153. doi:10.1023/a:1009947032694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G., & Balacheff, N. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

  • Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(5), 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10857-011-9179-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drageset, O. G. (2009). Exploring mathematical knowledge for teaching. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, C. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematical Education (vol. 2, pp. 473–480).

  • Drageset, O. G. (2010). The interplay between the beliefs and the knowledge of mathematics teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development Journal, 12(1), 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children’s mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, M.L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). NCTM.

  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Kieran, C. (2002). The mathematical discourse of 13 year old partnered problem solving and its relation to the mathematics that emerges. In C. Kieran, E. A. Forman, & A. Sfard (Eds.), Learning discourse: Discursive approaches to research in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.

  • Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching Children How to Use Language to Solve Maths Problems. Language and Education, 20(6), 507–528. doi:10.2167/le678.0

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, D. (1990). Cognition, computing, and cooperation. In S. P. Robertson, W. Zachary, & J. B. Black (Eds.), Cognition, computing, and cooperation (pp. 84–94). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M., & Højgaard Jensen, T. (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring: Ideer og inspiration til udvikling af matematikundervisning i Danmark [Competencies and mathematics learning: ideas and inspiration for development of mathematics teaching in Denmark]. København: Undervisningsministeriet.

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis. An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5(1), 1–37.

  • Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing? In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bartolini Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222–255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

    Ove Gunnar Drageset

Authors
  1. Ove Gunnar Drageset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ove Gunnar Drageset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drageset, O.G. Redirecting, progressing, and focusing actions—a framework for describing how teachers use students’ comments to work with mathematics. Educ Stud Math 85, 281–304 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9515-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9515-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation