Abstract
The idea that mathematical knowledge is embodied is increasingly taking hold in the mathematics education literature. Yet there are challenges to the existing conceptualizations: There tend to be breaks between (a) the living and experienced body (flesh) and linguistic forms of thought, (b) individual and collective forms of knowing, and (c) the material body and the source of intentionality. Grounded in material phenomenology, we theorize the living body as semiotic expression that not only grounds thought but also leads to its development. We provide a detailed case study that elucidates the three ways in which the living body serves as sign for the growth of a second-grade student’s geometric understanding and the other bodies he interacts with.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditations pascaliènnes [Pascalian thoughts]. Paris: Seuil.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Eco, U. (1986). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, trans.), 2nd rev. ed.. New York: Crossroads.
Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit [Being and time]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Henry, M. (1965). Philosophie et phénoménologie du corps: Essai sur l’ontologie biranienne [Philosophy and phenomenology of the body: Essay on Biranian ontology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Henry, M. (2000). Incarnation: Une philosophie de la chair [Incarnation: A philosophy of the flesh]. Paris: Seuil.
Henry, M. (2005). Voir l’invisible: sur Kandinsky [Seeing the invisible: On Kandisky]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Maine de Biran, P. (1859). Ouvres inédites, tome II. [Unpublished works, vol. 2]. Paris: Dezobry & Magdeleine.
Maine de Biran, P. (1952). Mémoire sur la décomposition de la pensée [Notes on the deconstruction of thought]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1969). Werke Band 23: Das Kapital [Capital: Marx and Engels’ works, vol. 2]. Berlin: Dietz.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception [Phenomenolgy of perception]. Paris: Gallimard.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible [The visible and invisible]. Paris: Gallimard.
Nancy, J.-L. (1993). The birth to presence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Nancy, J.-L. (2006). Corpus. Paris: Métaillé.
Radford, L., Edwards, L., & Arzarello, F. (2009). Introduction: Beyond words. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 91–95.
Roth, W.-M. (2002). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71, 365–392.
Roth, W.-M. (2009). Appreciating the embodied social nature of mathematical cognition. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Mathematical representation at the interface of body and culture (pp. 335–350). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Roth, W.-M. (2010a). Incarnation: Radicalizing the embodiment in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(1), 2–9.
Roth, W.-M. (2010b). Language, learning, context: Talking the talk. London: Routledge.
Roth, W.-M., & Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. (2006). Tracking situated, distributed, and embodied communication in real time. In M. A. Vanchevsky (Ed.), Focus on cognitive psychology research (pp. 237–261). Hauppauge: Nova Science.
Sartre, J.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness. New York: Gramercy Books.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). The corporeal turn: An interdisciplinary reader. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Thom, J. S., Roth, W.-M., & Bautista, A. (2010). In the flesh: Living growing conceptual domains in a geometry lesson. Complicity, 7, 77–87.
Varela, F. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford: Stanford University.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Acknowledgments
This research project was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We are grateful to Jean-François Maheux and Bruno Jayme who helped us with the collection of data. We also wish to express our sincere thanks to the first and second grade students, their regular teacher, and the teacher assistants who supported us during the weeks of the study. Finally, we are indebted to the reviewers of this paper. Their close readings of the manuscript provided critical feedback that greatly contributed to the development of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thom, J.S., Roth, WM. Radical embodiment and semiotics: toward a theory of mathematics in the flesh. Educ Stud Math 77, 267–284 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9293-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9293-y